The Voice of the Student as a ‘Consumer’

  • Louise Bunce


Bunce discusses the impact of students being defined as ‘consumers’ of their higher education. The chapter first considers when and why students came to be defined as consumers in England and Wales, UK, and then reflects upon the advantages and disadvantages associated with treating students as consumers of their education. This discussion includes the perspectives of both students and academic staff, and reviews empirical evidence about the effects of students themselves identifying as consumers on their approaches to learning and academic performance. The chapter concludes with a summary of the challenges for universities when listening to the student as consumer voice and emphasises the importance of striking a balance between making students feel heard, while resisting the notion that ‘the customer is always right’.


  1. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd, C. (2018). A beginner’s guide to the Office for Students. Retrieved from
  3. Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S. E. (2017). The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 1958–1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bunce, L., & Bennett, M. (in press). A degree of studying? Approaches to learning and academic performance among student ‘consumers’. Active Learning in Higher Education.Google Scholar
  5. Cardoso, S., Carvalho, T., & Santiago, R. (2011). From students to consumers: Reflections on the marketisation of Portuguese higher education. European Journal of Education, 46(2), 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delucchi, M., & Korgen, K. (2002). “We’re the customer—We pay the tuition”: Student consumerism among undergraduate sociology majors. Teaching Sociology, 30(1), 100–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2003). The future of higher education. Norwich: HMSO.Google Scholar
  8. Diseth, Å., & Martinsen, Ø. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(2), 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K., & Ferguson, J. (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(8), 1907–1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ek, A. C., Ideland, M., Jönsson, S., & Malmberg, C. (2013). The tension between marketisation and academisation in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1305–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eley, M. G. (1992). Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students. Higher Education, 23, 231–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Espinoza, J. (2015, November 24). University students in England ‘pay the highest tuition fees in the world’. The Telegraph. Retrieved from
  13. Finney, T., & Finney, R. (2010). Are students their universities’ customers? An exploratory study. Education and Training, 52(4), 276–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greatrix, P. (2011). University isn’t just a business—And the student isn’t always right. The Guardian. Retrieved from
  15. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (2011). National Student Survey. Retrieved from
  16. Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). (2017). What do graduates do and earn? Starting salaries. Retrieved from
  17. Jones-Devitt, S., & Samiei, C. (2010). From Accrington Stanley to academia? The use of league tables and student surveys to determine ‘quality’ in higher education. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketisation of higher education (pp. 86–100). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. King, N., & Bunce, L. (under review). A degree of consumerism? Academics’ perceptions of motivation in undergraduate student ‘consumers’. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  19. Koris, R., & Nokelainen, P. (2015). The student-customer orientation questionnaire (SCOQ): Application of customer metaphor to higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(1), 115–138.Google Scholar
  20. Koris, R., Örtenblad, A., Kerem, K., & Ojala, T. (2015). Student-customer orientation at a higher education institution: The perspective of undergraduate business students. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 25(1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lomas, L. (2007). Are students consumers? Perceptions of academic staff. Quality in Higher Education, 13(1), 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 36–55). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. McMahon, W. W. (2009). Higher learning, greater good: The private and social benefits of higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Molesworth, M., Nixon, E., & Scullion, R. (2009). Having, being and higher education: The marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Naidoo, R., & Jamieson, I. (2005). Empowering participants or corroding learning? Towards a research agenda on the impact of student consumerism in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (NCIHE). (1997). Higher education in the learning society. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  28. Newman, J. H. (1959). The idea of a university. New York: Image Books (Original 1852).Google Scholar
  29. Pitman, T. (2000). Perceptions of academics and students as customers: A survey of administrative staff in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(2), 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saunders, D. B. (2014). They do not buy it: Exploring the extent to which entering first-year students view themselves as customers. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 25, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shumar, W. (1997). College for sale: A critique of the commodification of higher education. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  32. Todd, S., Barnoff, L., Moffatt, K., Panitch, M., Parada, H., & Strumm, B. (2017). A social work re-reading of students as consumers. Social Work Education, 36(5), 542–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tomlinson, M. (2014). Exploring the impacts of policy changes on student approaches and attitudes to learning in contemporary higher education: Implications for student learning engagement. Retrieved from
  34. Tomlinson, M. (2017). Student perceptions of themselves as ‘consumers’ of higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(4), 450–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. White, N. R. (2007). ‘The customer is always right?’: Student discourse about higher education in Australia. Higher Education, 54(4), 593–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Williams, J. (2011). Constructing consumption: What media representations reveal about today’s students. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketisation of higher education (pp. 170–182). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Williams, J. (2013). Consuming higher education: Why learning can’t be bought. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  38. Woodall, T., Hiller, A., & Resnick, S. (2014). Making sense of higher education: Students as consumers and the value of the university experience. Studies in Higher Education, 39(1), 48–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louise Bunce
    • 1
  1. 1.Oxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations