The final goal of BL research is the repeatable production of such objects in the laboratory and their controlled study, something that proves impossible “in the wild” because of their unpredictable occurrence. Unfortunately, the number of experiments dedicated to BL production is much smaller than the number of theories about them. Making theories of course is easier and cheaper than doing experiments, since the latter requires a laboratory and an experimental setup (and maybe a considerable amount of money), whereas theories can in principle be made in your study with paper and pencil alone.
- Boissonnat, G. et al (2016) Measurement of ion and electron drift velocity and electronic attachment in air for ionization chambers. arXix preprint:arXiv:1609.03740Google Scholar
- Grigor’ev, A. and Grigor'eva, I. D. and Shiryaeva, S. (1992) Ball lightning penetration into closed rooms: 43 eyewitness accounts. Journal of Scientific Exploration 6:261–279Google Scholar
- Haldoupis, C. et al (2013) The VLF fingerprint of elves: Step-like and long-recovery early VLF perturbations caused by powerful +- CG lightning EM pulses. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 118:5392–5402Google Scholar
- Rakov, V. A. and Uman, M. A. (2003) Lightning: physics and effects, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Sagan, P. (2004) Ball Lightning: Paradox of Physics. iUniverse, Inc.Google Scholar
- Stenhoff, M. (1999) Ball Lightning. An Unsolved Problem in Atmospheric Physics. Kluver Academic/Plenum PublishersGoogle Scholar