The discussions about overfishing did not escape this atmosphere of heated and polarised debate, either. In 10 years the world of fisheries scientists, previously a rather impassive nerdy maths club of biologists, ecologists and economists, had changed into a swirling shark pond in which only the strongest were able to survive. There was a true war between movements, which was being fought tooth and nail. Take the iconic battle between Daniel Pauly and Ray Hilborn.
- 188.Pauly D (2009) Aquacalypse now. The New RepublicGoogle Scholar
- 79.Eisenhower D (2006) The military–industrial complex; the farewell address of president Eisenhower. Basements PublicationsGoogle Scholar
- 134.Hilborn R (2011) Greenpeace (2016) complaint letter to the president of the University of Washington about research practices of Professor Ray Hilborn. Let us eat fish. The New York Times op-ed contribution, April 14th 2011Google Scholar
- 119.Greenpeace (2016) Complaint letter to the president of the University of Washington about research practices of Professor Ray Hilborn, May 11 2016Google Scholar
- 94.FAO (2016) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2016. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar