Advertisement

Energetic, Exergetic, and Environmental Assessments of a Biomass Gasifier-Based Hydrogen Production and Liquefaction System

  • Yunus Emre Yuksel
  • Murat OzturkEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

In this chapter, a novel hydrogen generation and liquefaction process is presented. The source for this plant straw is chosen as biomass source. Biomass-based hydrogen generation and liquefaction plant consist of biomass gasifier, air separation unit, catalyst bed component with helium expander and liquid hydrogen storage tank sub-component. To examine the performance of plant, energy, and exergy analyses have performed. Also, the environmental analyses for various system design based on generation options have been conducted to reveal the CO2 emission of system. The energetic and exergetic efficiencies of plant for the base design parameters have been found as 68.26% and 64.72%, respectively. Parametric analysis results also indicate the effects of some variables on system performance and environmental effect of the system.

Keywords

Biomass gasification Hydrogen Liquefaction Energy Exergy Environmental analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Dincer I, Acar C (2015) Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability. Int J Hydrog Energy 40(34):11094–11111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kothari R, Buddhi D, Sawhney RL (2008) Comparison of environmental and economic aspects of various hydrogen production methods. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12(2):553–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balat H, Kirtay E (2010) Hydrogen from biomass—present scenario and future prospects. Int J Hydrog Energy 35(14):7416–7426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sikarwar VS, Zhao M, Clough P et al (2016) An overview of advances in biomass gasification. Energy Environ Sci 9(10):2939–2977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Molino A, Chianese S, Musmarra D (2016) Biomass gasification technology: the state of the art overview. J Energy Chem 25(1):10–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heidenreich S, Foscolo PU (2015) New concepts in biomass gasification. Prog Energy Combust Sci 46:72–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shayan E, Zare V, Mirzaee I (2018) Hydrogen production from biomass gasification; a theoretical comparison of using different gasification agents. Energy Convers Manag 159:30–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dincer I, Rosen MA (2012) Exergy: energy, environment and sustainable development. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Szargut J, Styrylska T (1964) Approximate evaluation of the exergy of fuels. Brennst Wärme Kraft 16(12):589–596Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    van den Broek R, Faaij A, Wijk AV (1996) Biomass combustion for power generation. Biomass Bioenergy 11(4):271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Channiwala SA, Parikh PP (2002) A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel 81:1051–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ahmadi P, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2012) Exergo-environmental analysis of an integrated organic Rankine cycle for trigeneration. Energy Convers Manag 64:447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scott RB, Brickwedde FG, Urey HC, Wahl MH (1934) The vapor pressures and derived thermal properties of hydrogen and deuterium. J Chem Phys 2:454–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sullivan NS, Zhou D, Edwards CM (1990) Precise and efficient in situ ortho-para-hydrogen converter. Cryogenics 30:734–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lapuerta M, Hernández JJ, Pazo A, López J (2008) Gasification and co-gasification of biomass wastes: effect of the biomass origin and the gasifier operating conditions. Fuel Process Technol 89(9):828–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mohtaram S, Chen W, Zargar T, Lin J (2017) Energy-exergy analysis of compressor pressure ratio effects on thermodynamic performance of ammonia water combined cycle. Energy Convers Manag 134:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Education Faculty, Math and Science EducationAfyon Kocatepe UniversityAfyonkarahisarTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of TechnologyApplied Science University of IspartaIspartaTurkey

Personalised recommendations