Advertisement

Simulating Global Strategic Challenges: A Teamwork Perspective

  • Joan LofgrenEmail author
  • Elyssebeth Leigh
  • Andres Ramirez
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the impact of teamwork through the performance of undergraduate students in an online international business simulation. The authors draw on quantitative and qualitative data gathered during several iterations of integrative courses at two universities, focusing on factors such as team formation and team dynamics. Insights into experiential learning will be useful to other faculty considering the use of simulations.

References

  1. Aalto. (2016). Student assessment material used with prior permission of the author.Google Scholar
  2. Aalto. (2017). Student assessment material used with prior permission of the author.Google Scholar
  3. Aalto. (2018). Student assessment material used with prior permission of the author.Google Scholar
  4. ABSEL. (2018). ABSEL developments in business simulations and experiential learning—Proceedings of the annual conference/s (online database). Retrieved from https://absel.org/?page_id=22
  5. Appelo, J. (2016). Create a safe-to-fail environment. Retrieved February 23, 2019, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jurgenappelo/2016/04/03/create-a-safe-to-fail-environment/#2ae9e60b10d8
  6. Belbin, M. (2018). Team role preferences. Retrieved May 10, 2018, from https://www.belbin.com
  7. Benckendorff, P., Lohmann, D. G., Pratt, D. M., Reynolds, P., Strickland, P., Whitelaw, P., et al. (2014). Enhancing student learning outcomes with simulation based pedagogies. Retrieved from https://www.bizsims.edu.au/a-z-index-simulators
  8. Bryant. (2018). Student assessment material used with prior permission of the author.Google Scholar
  9. Carrera, A. M., Naweed, A., Leigh, E., Crea, T., Krynski, B., Heveldt, K., et al. (2018). Constructing safe containers for effective learning: Vignettes of breakdown in psychological safety during simulated scenarios. Intersections in simulation and gaming. ISAGA 2016, SimTecT 2016. Naweed, A., Wardaszko, M., Leigh, E., & Meijer, S., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Cham. vol 10711.Google Scholar
  10. CESIM. (2018). CESIM Global Challenge, Cesim. Helsinki, Finland. Retrieved from https://www.cesim.com
  11. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R. L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geneca (Blog post). (2017). Four teamwork tips for an effective product launch. Retrieved February 24, 2019, from https://www.geneca.com/4-key-values-of-effective-teamwork/
  13. Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1986). The manual of learning styles. Maidenhead, UK: Ardingly House, Peter Honey.Google Scholar
  14. Hwang, M. I. (2018). Relationship between teamwork and team performance: Experience from an ERPsim competition. Journal of Information Systems Education, 29(3), 157–168.Google Scholar
  15. Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2017). Experiential learning theory as a guide for experiential educators in higher education. ELTHE: A Journal for Engaged Educators, 1(1), 7–44.Google Scholar
  16. Kolb, D. A., Rubin, I. M., & McIntyre, J. M. (1979). Organizational psychology an experiential approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Leigh, E. (2003). A practitioner researcher perspective on facilitating an open, infinite, chaordic simulation. EdD, University of Technology, Sydney. Unpublished thesis. Retrieved from https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/2100/308
  18. Lencioni, P. M. (2010). The five dysfunctions of a team—A leadership fable. Australia: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Lohmann, G., Pratt, M. A., Benckendorff, P., Stricland, P., Reynolds, P., & Whitelaw, P. A. (2019). Online business simulations: Authentic teamwork, learning outcomes, and satisfaction. Higher Education, 77, 455–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McEwan, D., Ruissen, G. R., Eys, M. A., Zumbo, B. D., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2017, January 13). The effectiveness of teamwork training on teamwork behaviors and team performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled interventions. PLOS ONE, 12(1).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McLeod, S. A. (2017). Kolb—Learning styles. Retrieved December 27, 2018, from www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html
  22. Thompson, A. A. J., Stappenbeck, G. J., Reidenbach, M. A., Thrasher, I. F., & Harms, C. C. (2019). The business strategy game: Competing in a global marketplace (2019 ed.). Retrieved from https://www.bsg-online.com
  23. Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2017). The effect of games and simulations on higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 22.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0062-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan Lofgren
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elyssebeth Leigh
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Andres Ramirez
    • 5
  1. 1.Aalto UniversityEspooFinland
  2. 2.Aalto UniversityHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.The University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  4. 4.University of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia
  5. 5.Bryant UniversitySmithfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations