Cyber-Physical Systems Are Different

  • Hermann Kopetz


Cyber-Physical Systems differ from conventional data-processing systems in a number of important aspects. These differences are so profound that they require a new state of the mind when dealing with Cyber-Physical Systems [Lee08].


  1. [Dvo09]
    Dvorak, D.L.. NASA Study on Flight Software Complexity. Jet Propulsion Laboratory. California Institute of Technology. 2009. URL: Retrieved on June 14, 2018.
  2. [Kop11]
    Kopetz, H.. Real-time Systems–Design Principles for Distributed Embedded Applications. Springer Verlag, 2011.Google Scholar
  3. [Kos10]
    Koscher K. et al. Experimental Security Analysis of a Modern Automobile. Proc. of the 2010 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. IEEE Press. 2010.Google Scholar
  4. [Lee08]
    Lee, E. A. Cyber-Physical Systems Design Challenges. Proc. of ISORC 2008. Pp.363–369. IEEE Press. 2008.Google Scholar
  5. [Liu17]
    Liu, W. et al.. A Survey of Deep Neural Network Architectures and their Applications. Elsevier Neurocomputing. Vol. 234, pp. 11–26. 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [Ogi17].
    Ogie, R.I., Cyber Security Incidents on Critical Infrastructure and Industrial Networks. Research Report University of Wollongong, Australia. URL: / Retrieved on October 10, 2018.
  7. [Pol96]
    Poledna, S., Fault-Tolerant Real-Time Systems, the Problem of Replica Determinism. Springer Verlag. 1996Google Scholar
  8. [Tör18]
    Törngren, M. and Sellgren, U. Complexity Challenges in Development of Cyber-Physical Systems. In: Principles of Modeling. Ed. Lohstroh M. et al. Springer LNCS 10760. Pp. 478–503. Springer Verlag. 2018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hermann Kopetz
    • 1
  1. 1.Vienna University of TechnologyBaden-SiegenfeldAustria

Personalised recommendations