The 'Resource' Approach to Mathematics Education pp 173-194 | Cite as

# Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Resources: A Look Across Cultural Boundaries

## Abstract

This chapter is written as a reflection on my encounters with the growing body of research on mathematics teachers’ use of resources, focusing on the documentational approach and its impact on my research. I begin by detailing my first encounter with the documentational genesis framework in 2008, introducing me to new language, frameworks, and colleagues from a different cultural context. I then describe two subsequent research projects I have undertaken, one in the USA and the other involving four contexts: Finland, Flanders (Belgium), Sweden, and the USA. These projects have allowed me to refine and deploy the participatory perspective in relation to the documentational approach and have contributed to my understanding of teachers’ interactions with mathematics curriculum resources. I conclude by offering four propositions for research on teachers’ interactions with curriculum resources; the first three reflect the theoretical perspectives of the documentational framework. The fourth reflects findings from my research.

## Keywords

Curriculum use; Participatory perspective Documentational genesis Mathematics teachers Curriculum resources Cross-cultural research## References

- Andrews, P. (2007). Negotiating meaning in cross-national studies of mathematics teaching: Kissing frogs to find princes.
*Comparative Education, 43*(4), 489–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?
*Journal of Teacher Education, 59*(5), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning.
*Written Communication, 25*(2), 166–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016).
*Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame*. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar - Boesen, J., Helenius, O., Bergqvist, E., Bergqvist, T., Lithner, J., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2014). Developing mathematical competence: From the intended to the enacted curriculum.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33*, 72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Brown, M. (2009). Toward a theory of curriculum design and use: Understanding the teacher-tool relationship. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.),
*Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction*(pp. 17–36). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar - Choppin, J. (2011). Learned adaptations: Teachers’ understanding and use of curriculum resources.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14*, 331–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Clarke, D. (2013).
*Cultural studies in mathematics education*. Paper presented at the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Antalya, Turkey.Google Scholar - Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning.
*Educational Researcher, 34*(3), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Dietiker, L., & Riling, M. (2018). Design (in)tensions in mathematics curriculum.
*International Journal of Educational Research, 92*, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions.
*ZDM – Mathematics Education, 45*(5), 633–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gueudet, G. (this volume) Studying teachers’ documentation work: Emergence of a theoretical approach. In L. Trouche, G. Gueudet, & B. Pepin (Eds.).
*The ‘resource’ approach to mathematics education.*Cham: Springer.Google Scholar - Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers?
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71*(3), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (Eds.). (2010).
*Ressources vives, le travail documentaire des professeurs en mathématiques*. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar - Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what?
*British Educational Research Journal, 28*(4), 567–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kheong, F. H., Sharpe, P., Soon, G. K., Ramakrishnan, C., Wah, B. L. P., & Choo, M. (2010).
*Math in focus: The Singapore approach by Marshall Cavendish*. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar - Kim, O. K. (2018). Teacher decisions on lesson sequence and their impact on opportunities for students to learn. In L. Fan, L. Trouche, C. Qi, S. Rezat, & J. Visnovska (Eds.),
*Research on mathematics textbooks and ‘teachers resources. Advances and issues. ICME-13 monograph*(pp. 315–339). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mason, J., & Spence, M. (1999). Beyond mere knowledge of mathematics: The importance of knowing-to act in the moment.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38*, 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - NCTM. (1989).
*Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics*. Reston: Author.Google Scholar - Osborn, M. (2004). New methodologies for comparative research? Establishing ‘constants’ and ‘contexts’ in educational experience.
*Oxford Review of Education, 30*(2), 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pepin, B. (2005). Can we compare like with like in comparative education research? – Methodological considerations in cross-cultural studies in mathematics education. In B. Hudson & J. Fragner (Eds.),
*Researching Teaching and Learning of Mathematics II*(pp. 39–54). Linz: Trauner Verlag.Google Scholar - Pepin, B. (2018). Enhancing teacher learning with curriculum resources. In L. Fan, L. Trouche, C. Qi, S. Rezat, & J. Visnovska (Eds.),
*Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers’ resources. Advances and issues. ICME-13 monograph*(pp. 359–374). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pepin, B., & Haggarty, L. (2001). Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French, and German classrooms: a way to understand teaching and learning cultures.
*ZDM – Mathematics Education, 33*(5), 158–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013). Re-sourcing teachers’ work and interactions: A collective perspective on resources, their use and transformation.
*ZDM – Mathematics Education, 45*(7), 929–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pepin, B., Choppin, J., Ruthven, K., & Sinclair, N. (2017a). Digital curriculum resources in mathematics education: Foundations for change.
*ZDM – Mathematics Education, 49*(5), 645–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2017b). Refining teacher design capacity: Mathematics teachers’ interactions with digital curriculum resources.
*ZDM – Mathematics Education, 49*(5), 799–812. http://rdcu.be/tmXb.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pepin, B., Artigue, M., Gitirana, M., Miyakawa, T., Ruthven, K., & Xu, B. (this volume) Mathematics teachers as curriculum designers: An international perspective to develop a deeper understanding of the concept. In L. Trouche, G. Gueudet, & B. Pepin (Eds.).
*The ‘resource’ approach to mathematics education.*Cham: Springer.Google Scholar - Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies. Une approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Paris: Armand Colin (English version at http://ergoserv.psy.univ-paris8.fr/Site/default.asp?Act_group=1).
- Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development.
*Curriculum Inquiry, 29*(3), 315–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning?
*Elementary School Journal, 100*(4), 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula.
*Review of Educational Research, 75*(2), 211–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Remillard, J. T. (2010). Modes d’engagement : comprendre les transactions des professeurs avec les ressources curriculaires en mathématiques. In G. Gueudet & L. Trouche (Eds.),
*Ressources Vives. Le travail documentaire des professeurs en mathématiques*(pp. 201–216). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar - Remillard, J. T. (2012). Modes of engagement: Understanding teachers’ transactions with mathematics curriculum resources. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.),
*From text to ‘lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development*(pp. 105–122). New York: Springer.Google Scholar - Remillard, J. T. (2013, May).
*Beyond the script: Educative features of five mathematics curricula and how teachers use them*. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar - Remillard, J. T. (2016). Keeping an eye on the teacher in the digital curriculum race. In M. Bates & Z. Usiskin (Eds.),
*Digital curricula in school mathematics*(pp. 195–204). Greenwich: Information Age.Google Scholar - Remillard, J. T. (2018a). Examining teachers’ interactions with curriculum resource to uncover pedagogical design capacity. In L. Fan, L. Trouche, C. Qi, S. Rezat, & J. Visnovska (Eds.),
*Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers’ resources: Advances and issues. ICME-13 monograph*(pp. 69–88). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Remillard, J. T. (2018b). Mapping the relationship between written and enacted curriculum: Examining teachers’ decision making. In G. Kaiser (Ed.),
*Invited lectures from the 13th international congress on mathematical education*. New York: Springer.Google Scholar - Remillard, J. T., & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning.
*Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 35*(5), 352–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Remillard, J., & Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualising the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education.
*ZDM – Mathematics Education, 46*(5), 705–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Remillard, J. T. & Kim, O-K. (2017). Knowledge of curriculum embedded mathematics: Exploring a critical domain of teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics 96(1), 65–81 (view online: http://rdcu.be/qajL).
- Remillard, J. T., & Kim, O. K. (forthcoming).
*Comparing elementary mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teachers and teaching*. New York: Springer.Google Scholar - Remillard, J.T., & Van Steenbrugge, H., (in preparation). A multimodal analysis of the voice of six teacher’s guides from the United States, Flanders, and Sweden.Google Scholar
- Remillard, J.T., Van Steenbrugge, H., & Bergqvist, T. (2016, April).
*A cross-cultural analysis of the voice of six Teacher’s guides from three cultural contexts.*Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar - Remillard, J. T., Reinke, L. R., & Kapoor, R. (2019). What is the point? Examining how curriculum materials articulate mathematical goals and how teachers steer instruction.
*International Journal of Educational Research, 93*, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Rowland, T. (2013). The knowledge quartet: The genesis and application of a framework for analyzing mathematics teaching and deepening teachers’ mathematics knowledge.
*Journal of Education, 1*(3), 15–43.Google Scholar - Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.
*Educational Researcher, 15*(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.
*Harvard Educational Review, 57*(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sleep, L. (2009).
*Teaching to the mathematical point: Knowing and using mathematics in teaching*. Unpublished PhD. University of Michigan, USA.Google Scholar - Sleep, L. (2012). The work of steering instruction toward the mathematical point a decomposition of teaching practice.
*American Educational Research Journal, 49*(5), 935–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Stein, M. K., & Kim, G. (2009). The role of mathematics curriculum materials in large-scale urban reform: An analysis of demands and opportunities for teacher learning. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.),
*Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction*(pp. 37–55). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar - Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999).
*The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom*. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar - Ulrich, C. (2015). Stages in constructing and coordinating units additively and multiplicatively (Part 1).
*For the Learning of Mathematics, 35*(3), 2–7.Google Scholar - Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).
*Thought and language*. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Original work published 1934).Google Scholar - Warwick, D., & Osherson, S. (Eds.). (1973).
*Comparative research methods: An overview*. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar - Wertsch, J. V. (1998).
*Mind as action*. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar