A Study of Metacognitive Problem Solving in Undergraduate Engineering Students
One of the key challenges in engineering education is the problem of teaching future engineers’ professional skills. Engineering students need to know what they do and do not know. This is termed metacognition. There is still quite a bit that we do not know about how metacognition develops in classroom settings. In this study, we discuss an exploration of these issues using both physical and virtual reality (VR) simulations of manufacturing systems; which are performed by student teams. We discuss the incorporation of measures of metacognition into a model of conflict and error to predict what types of experiences may be most helpful to produce improved metacognition in engineering students.
KeywordsMetacognition Engineering education Virtual reality
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. (1830741). Awarded 8/1/18.
- 1.Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/
- 2.Levesque, K., Laird, J., Hensley, E., Choy, S.P., Cataldi, E.F., Hudson, L.: Career and Technical Education in the United States: 1990 to 2005. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2008-035. National Center for Education Statistics (2008)Google Scholar
- 5.García Peñalvo, F.J.: Entrepreneurial and problem solving skills in software engineers. J. Inf. Technol. Res. 8, iv–vi (2015)Google Scholar
- 10.Markman, E.M.: Realizing that you don’t understand: a preliminary investigation. Child Dev. 48(3), 986–992 (1977)Google Scholar
- 13.Zohar, A., Lustov, E.: Challenges in Addressing Metacognition in Professional Development Programs in the Context of Instruction of Higher-Order Thinking. Contemporary Pedagogies in Teacher Education and Development. Intech Open (2018)Google Scholar
- 16.van Gog, T., Jarodzka, H.: Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance cognitive and metacognitive processes in computer-based learning environments. In: International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies, pp. 143–156. Springer (2013)Google Scholar
- 17.Lawanto, O., Santoso, H.B.: Development and validation of the engineering design metacognitive questionnaire. In: American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference (2014)Google Scholar
- 20.Green, D.M., Swets, J.A.: Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Wiley, New York (1966)Google Scholar
- 21.Salvucci, D.D., Goldberg, J.H.: Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In: Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium, pp. 71–78. ACM Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar