Advertisement

Automatic Truss Design Based on Topology Optimization and Image Processing Techniques

  • Po Ting LinEmail author
  • Chyi-Yeu Lin
  • Tung-Yao Cheng
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 73)

Abstract

Topology Optimization (TO) methods have been well developed for structural and multidisciplinary designs in terms of finding the optimal objective functions subject to constraints of loading conditions and other design requirements. In practical uses, clear black-and-white optimal designs are desired but may not be delivered at the end of the TO procedures. Therefore, many additional treatments such as regularization and filtering have been developed to produce black-and-white designs. Some of the said procedures were also found in the fields of computer vision and image processing. This paper presents a method to automatically generate truss designs by applying image-processing techniques to TO designs. The presented post-processing procedure includes noise removal, pattern thinning, and automatic determination of truss nodes linages. Several numerical examples were shown to demonstrated the presented methodology for automatic truss designs.

Keywords

Structural Design Topology Optimization Truss Design Image Processing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was financially supported by the “Center for Cyber-physical System Innovation” from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan.

References

  1. 1.
    Michell, A.G.M.: LVIII. The limits of economy of material in frame-structures. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 8(47), 589-597 (1904).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prager, W.: Optimality criteria derived from classical extremum principles. SM Studies Series, Solid Mechanics Division, Univ of Waterloo, Ontario/CANADA (1969).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bendsøe, M.P., Kikuchi, N.: Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 71(2), 197-224 (1988).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bendsoe, M.P.: Optimization of structural topology, shape, and material. Springer (1995).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manuel, M.C.E., Lin, P.T. Physical-based Material Property Models for Heat Conduction Topology Optimization. In: Asian Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, ACSMO 2016, 23, Nagasaki, Japan, (2016).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manuel, M.C.E., Lin, P.T. Performance of Alternative Material Property Models for Heat Conduction Topology Optimization. In: Asian Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, ACSMO 2016, 24, Nagasaki, Japan, (2016).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Manuel, M.C.E.: A Complete Research on Material Property Models on Heat Conduction Topology Optimization. PhD Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University (2016).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manuel, M.C.E., Lin, P.T.: Design Explorations of Heat Conductive Pathways. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 104, 835-851 (2017).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stolpe, M., Svanberg, K.: An alternative interpolation scheme for minimum compliance topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 22(2), 116-124 (2001).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bruns, T.E.: A reevaluation of the SIMP method with filtering and an alternative formulation for solid–void topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 30(6), 428-436 (2005).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keey, R.B.: Drying: principles and practice. Elsevier (2013).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamilton, R.L., Crosser, O.K.: Thermal conductivity of heterogeneous two-component systems. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 1(3), 187-191 (1962).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kirkpatrick, S.: Percolation and conduction. Reviews of modern physics 45(4), 574 (1973).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Charbonnier, P., Blanc-Féraud, L., Aubert, G., Barlaud, M.: Deterministic edge-preserving regularization in computed imaging. IEEE Transactions on image processing 6(2), 298-311 (1997).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, M.Y., Zhou, S., Ding, H.: Nonlinear diffusions in topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 28(4), 262-276 (2004).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sapiro, G.: Geometric partial differential equations and image analysis. Cambridge university press (2006).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sigmund, O.: Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 33(4-5), 401-424 (2007).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sigmund, O.: On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization. Journal of Structural Mechanics 25(4), 493-524 (1997).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bourdin, B.: Filters in topology optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 50(9), 2143-2158 (2001).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee, J.-S.: Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence(2), 165-168 (1980).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Keys, R.: Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing. IEEE transactions on acoustics, speech, and signal processing 29(6), 1153-1160 (1981).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang, W., Zhong, W., Guo, X.: An explicit length scale control approach in SIMP-based topology optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 282, 71-86 (2014).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Otsu, N.: A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 9(1), 62-66 (1979).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rosenfeld, A., Davis, L.S.: A Note on Thinning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-6(3), 226-228 (1976).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bremicker, M., Chirehdast, M., Kikuchi, N., Papalambros, P.: Integrated Topology and Shape Optimization in Structural Design∗. Journal of Structural Mechanics 19(4), 551-587 (1991).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sigmund, O., Petersson, J.: Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: a survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Structural optimization 16(1), 68-75 (1998).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Svanberg, K.: The method of moving asymptotes- a new method for structural optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 24(2), 359-373 (1987).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sigmund, O.: A 99 line topology optimization code written in Matlab. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 21(2), 120-127 (2001).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Andreassen, E., Clausen, A., Schevenels, M., Lazarov, B.S., Sigmund, O.: Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 43(1), 1-16 (2011).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu, K., Tovar, A.: An efficient 3D topology optimization code written in Matlab. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 50(6), 1175-1196 (2014).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang, S., Fu, K.: A thinning algorithm for discrete binary images. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Computers and Applications, pp. 879-886, (1984).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu, J., Gea, H.C., Du, P.A.: Robust Structural Design Optimization Under Non- Probabilistic Uncertainties. In: ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 1223-1229, (2011).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu, J., Gea, H.C.: Robust topology optimization under multiple independent unknown-but- bounded loads. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 329, 464-479 (2018).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Center for Cyber-Physical System InnovationNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations