Advertisement

Analysis of the effect of different friction models on the dynamic response of a rotor rubbing the housing

  • Juan C. Jauregui-CorreaEmail author
  • Sthephanie Camacho
  • Jovan Basaldua-Sanchez
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 73)

Abstract

This work presents the comparison of three friction models for the analysis of a rotor hitting the housing. The analytical solution are compared with experimental measurements of the friction force. The measurements are taken form a test rig that represents a rotor fractioning the housing. All the data were analyzed using the Continuous Wavelet Transform, the phase plane and the Recurrence Plot. The three models provided different solutions, and they represents parts of the phenomenon. The models represent the friction but the dynamic response is unable to predict the behaviour observed in the field.

Keywords

Friction Models Recurrence Plot Rotor Rubbing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A. D. Dimarogonas, S. A. Paipetis, and T. G. Chondros, “Analytical Methods in Rotor Dynamics,” in Analytical Methods in Rotor Dynamics, vol. 9, A. D. Dimarogonas, S. A. Paipetis, and T. G. Chondros, Eds. Springer Netherlands, 2013, pp. 115–143.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Golebiowski, N. Rainer, and E. Knopf, “Proceedings of the 9th IFToMM international conference on rotor dynamics,” in Proceedings of the 9th IFToMM international conference on rotor dynamics, 2015, vol. 21, pp. 2267–2281.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Muszynska, Rotordynamics. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. Muszynska and P. Goldman, “Chaotic responses of unbalanced rotor/bearing/stator systems with looseness or rubs,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 1683–1704, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    P. Goldman, A. Muszynska, and D. E. Bently, “Due Rotor-to-Stator,” vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 91–100, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    G. Gilardi and I. Sharf, “Literature survey of contact dynamics modelling,” Mech. Mach. Theory, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1213–1239, 2002.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    P. Varney and I. Green, “Response to Comments on: ‘Nonlinear phenomena, bifurcations, and routes to chaos in an asymmetrically supported rotor-stator contact system’ by Philip Varney, Itzhak Green [J. Sound Vib. 336 (2015) 207-226],” J. Sound Vib., vol. 409, pp. 343–346, 2017.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    H. Ma, Q. Zhao, X. Zhao, Q. Han, and B. Wen, “Dynamic characteristics analysis of a rotor-stator system under different rubbing forms,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 2392–2408, 2015.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    L. Cveticanin, “Free vibration of a Jeffcott rotor with pure cubic non-linear elastic property of the shaft,” Mech. Mach. Theory, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1330–1344, 2005.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Y. S. Choi, “Investigation on the whirling motion of full annular rotor rub,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 258, no. 1, pp. 191–198, 2002.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    F. Chu and Z. Zhang, “Bifurcation and chaos in a rub-impact Jeffcott rotor system,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 210, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Q. S. Lu, Q. H. Li, and E. H. Twizell, “The existence of periodic motions in rub-impact rotor systems,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 264, no. 5, pp. 1127–1137, 2003.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. Stender, M. Tiedemann, N. Hoffmann, and S. Oberst, “Impact of an irregular friction formulation on dynamics of a minimal model for brake squeal q,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 107, pp. 439–451, 2018.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. C. Jauregui, J. R. Resendiz, S. Thenozhi, T. Szalay, A. Jacso, and M. Takacs, “Frequency and Time-Frequency Analysis of Cutting Force and Vibration Signals for Tool Condition Monitoring,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, no. c, pp. 6400–6410, 2018.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Y. Yang, D. Cao, D. Wang, and G. Jiang, “Fixed-point rubbing characteristic analysis of a dual-rotor system based on the Lankarani-Nikravesh model,” Mech. Mach. Theory, vol. 103, pp. 202–221, 2016.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    D. W. Childs and D. Kumar, “Gt2011-45081,” in Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2011, 2011, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    P. Pennacchi and A. Vania, “Analysis of rotor-to-stator rub in a large steam turbogenerator,” Int. J. Rotating Mach., vol. 2007, 2007.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    J. Zheng, H. Pan, T. Liu, and Q. Liu, “Extreme-point weighted mode decomposition,” Signal Processing, vol. 142, pp. 366–374, 2018.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    X. An, “Local rub-impact fault diagnosis of a rotor system based on adaptive local iterative filtering,” Trans. Inst. Meas. Control, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 748–753, 2017.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    J. C. Jauregui, Parameter Identification and Monitoring of Mechanical Systems Under Nonlinear Vibration, 1st ed. Cambridge: Elsevier Woodhead Publishing, 2014.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    J. C. Jauregui and O. Gonzalez, Mechanical Vibrations of Discontinuous Systems, 1st ed. New York: Nova Publishers, 2009.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    J. C. Jauregui, J. A. Saenz, G. E. Aviation, and C. A. Gonzalez, “Evaluation of Friction Models for Rotor-Rubbing Predictions,” in Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, 2018, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    M. Graf and G. P. Ostermeyer, “Friction-induced vibration and dynamic friction laws: Instability at positive friction-velocity-characteristic,” Tribol. Int., vol. 92, pp. 255–258, 2015.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    J. Eckmann, S. Oliffson, and D. Ruelle, “Recurrence Plots of Dynamical Systems.,” Eur. Lett., vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 973–977, 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan C. Jauregui-Correa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sthephanie Camacho
    • 1
  • Jovan Basaldua-Sanchez
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad Autonoma de QueretaroSantiago de QuerétaroMexico

Personalised recommendations