Advertisement

Classical flutter study in turbomachinery cascade using boundary element method for incompressible flows

  • Chandra Shekhar Prasad
  • Ludek PesekEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 73)

Abstract

In this paper aeroelastic stability in steam turbine rotor is carried out using boundary element method. A mesh free fluid solver is developed for fast estimation of unsteady aerodynamic loading and to estimate the aerodynamic damping in 3D blade cascade. The aerodynamic damping is estimated traveling wave mode method. The unsteady incompressible flow field is modeled using Panel method. The structural part is modeled with non-linear beam element method based finite element method. Both solvers are loosely coupled to perform aeroelastic (flutter) co-simulation. The simulated results are validated with experimental results on 3D blade cascade. The proposed methodology successfully estimates aerodynamic damping with acceptable accuracy the for the aeroelastic (classical flutter) analysis of turbine blade cascade. Moreover, present aeroelastic method shows significant reduction in computational time.

Keywords

Steam Turbine Aeroelsticity Classical flutter Traveling wave method Panel method Reduce order aeroelastic model(ROAM) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgment:

This research is supported by the research project of Czech science foundation No. 16-04546S ” Aero-elastic couplings and dynamic behavior of rotational periodic bodies” and Czech science foundation No. 19-02288J Robust reduced-order modeling of fluid-structure interaction problems and the pilot project of Institute of Thermomechanics AS CR, v. v. i. included in a frame of conceptual development of the research organization RVO: 61388998.

Bibliography

  1. [1]
    H. Atassi and T. Akai. Effect of blade loading and thickness on the aerodynamics of oscillating cascades. In 16th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, page 277. A1AA, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J Panovsky and R. E Kilelb. A design method to prevent low pressure turbine blade flutter. Journal of engineering for gas turbines and power, 122(1):89–98, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. L. Hess. Calculation of potential flow about arbitrary three-dimensional lifting bodies. Final Technical Report MDC J5679-01, Naval Air Systems Command, Department of the Navy, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Chandra Shekhar Prasad and Grigorios Dimitriadis. Application of a 3d unsteady surface panel method with flow separation model to horizontal axis wind turbines. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 166:74 – 89, 2017.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    CS Prasad, Q-Z Chen, O Bruls, F DAmbrosio, and G Dimitriadis. Aeroservoelastic simulations for horizontal axis wind turbines. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 231(2):103–117, 2017.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Joseph Katz and Allen Plotkin. Low-Speed Aerodynamics. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 2001.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    ER McFariand. Solution of plane cascade flow using improved surface singularity methods. Journal of Engineering for Power JULY, 104:669, 1982.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Zong Qi Lei and Guo Zhu Liang. Solution of turbine blade cascade flow using an improved panel method. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, page Article ID 312430), 2015.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Fernando Barbarossa, Anthony B Parry, Jeffrey S Green, and Luca di Mare. An aerodynamic parameter for low-pressure turbine flutter. Journal of Turbomachinery, 138(5):051001, 2016.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    T Fransson. Aeroelasticity in axial flow turbomachines. Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Brussels, Belgium, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Joseph M Verdon. Review of unsteady aerodynamic methods for turbomachinery aeroelastic and aeroacoustic applications. AIAA journal, 31(2):235–250, 1993.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Chandra Shekhar Prasad and Ludk Peek. Analysis of classical flutter in steam turbine blades using reduced order aeroelastic model. In The 14th International Conference on Vibration Engineering and Technology of Machinery (VETOMAC XIV), pages 150–156, Lisabon, Portugal, Sept 2018.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Yoji Hanamura, Hideo Tanaka, and Kazuo Yamaguchi. A simplified method to measure unsteady forces acting on the vibrating blades in cascade. Bulletin of JSME, 23(180):880–887, 1980.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Damian Vogt. Experimental Investigation of Three-Dimensional Mechanisms in Low-Pressure Turbine Flutter. PhD thesis, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Thermomechanics, CASPragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Thermomechanics, CASPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations