Advertisement

Robust model-based trajectory planning for flexible mechanisms: experimental assessment

  • Paolo BoscariolEmail author
  • Dario Richiedei
  • Alberto Trevisani
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 73)

Abstract

This paper presents the experimental validation of a robust model-base motion planning technique for underactuated flexible mechanical systems in point-to-point motion. The method is aimed at producing motion profiles that result in reduced transient and residual vibrations, so that the motion task is completed with an accurate positioning. Unlike other methods in literature, the proposed method is also targeted at robustness, i.e. it reduces the effect of the uncertainties of the model used in the trajectory design. The preliminary experimental results proposed here show the reduced vibrations produced by the robust motion profile when the flexible-link mechanism is perturbed by increasing the endpoint mass, and its advantages over traditional input shaping techniques.

Keywords

model-based trajectory planning motion planning robust design flexible system residual vibrations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kiang, C.T., Spowage, A., Yoong, C.K.: Review of control and sensor system of flexible manipulator. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 77(1), 187–213 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Singhose, W.: Command shaping for flexible systems: a review of the first 50 years. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 10(4), 153–168 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Díaz, I.M., Pereira, E., Feliu, V., Cela, J.J.: Concurrent design of multimode input shapers and link dynamics for flexible manipulators. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 15(4), 646–651 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Singhose, W., Biediger, E.O., Chen, Y.H., Mills B.: Reference command shaping using specified-negative-amplitude input shapers for vibration reduction, J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control 126(1), 210–214 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Biagiotti, L., Melchiorri C.: Trajectory Planning for Automatic Machines and Robots. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chettibi, T.: Smooth point-to-point trajectory planning for robot manipulators by using radial basis functions. Robotica, 1–21, published online 31 October 2018Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh, T.: Optimal Reference Spaing for Dynamical Systems Theory and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Uchiyama, N., Sano, S., Haneda, K.: Residual vibration suppression using simple motion trajectory for mechanical systems. SICE Journal of Control, Measurement, and System Integration 8(3), 195–200 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bearee, R.: New Damped-Jerk trajectory for vibration reduction. Control Engineering Practice 28, 112–120 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Palomba, I., Richiedei, D., Trevisani, A.: Mode selection for reduced order modeling of mechanical systems excited at resonance. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 114, 268–276 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Palomba, I., Richiedei, D., Trevisani, A.: Energy-based optimal ranking of the interior modes for reduced-order models under periodic excitation. Shock and Vibration, 2015, Article ID 348106, (2015).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boscariol, P., Gasparetto, A.: Optimal trajectory planning for nonlinear systems: Robust and constrained solution. Robotica 34(6), 1243–1259 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boscariol, P., Richiedei, D.: Robust point-to-point trajectory planning for nonlinear underactuated systems: Theory and experimental assessment. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 50, 256–265 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Palomba, I. and Vidoni, R. and Wehrle, E.: Application of a parametric modal analysis approach to flexible-multibody systems. In: IFToMM Symposium on Mechanism Design for Robotics MEDER 2018, Mechanism and Machine Science 66, 386–394 (2018)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kirk, D.E.: Optimal control theory: an introduction. Dover Publications, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singer, N.C., Seering, W.P.: Preshaping command inputs to reduce system vibration. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 112(1), 76–82 (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Boscariol
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dario Richiedei
    • 1
  • Alberto Trevisani
    • 1
  1. 1.DTG, Università degli Studi di PadovaVicenzaItaly

Personalised recommendations