Calculated Modes for Assessing Operation Properties and Dependability of Vehicles

  • Vladimir AlginEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 73)


The problem of assessing the main operation and lifetime properties of vehicles based on justification of calculated cases is formulated and solved. Two approaches are used. The first one is developed for determining a calculated indicator by making a typical probabilistic representation of a parameter for property under study by example of the energy consumption of electric buses. The second approach relates to comparative procedures that allow to estimate the properties without a detailed set of data on construction of vehicles and their operation modes. In the frame of this approach, a method for estimating the energy consumption of an electric bus using data on the fuel consumption of a diesel bus of a similar mass is considered. The energy required for the movement of buses is compared, and the differences in their “Tank-to-Wheel” characteristics are taken into account. One more method is used for a comparative lifetime assessment of mechanical units; the parameters of the load mode are determined and the damage measure are calculated for objects being compared. The damage measures of the same gearbox are calculated when it works at various vehicles. The combination of both presented approaches increases the efficiency and validity of estimates when making decisions about the choice of parameters for the units or the use of ready-made units from different suppliers.


Vehicle Operation Properties Calculated Mode Assessing 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Driving cycle,, last accessed 2018/11/02.
  2. 2.
    EPA. Detailed Test Information,, last accessed 2018/11/02.
  3. 3.
    Emission Test Cycles,, last accessed 2018/11/02.
  4. 4.
    André, M. The ARTEMIS European driving cycles for measuring car pollutant emissions. Science of the Total Environment 334-335, 73-84 (2004).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Masliakova, K. Optimal routing and charging procedures for electric buses. Master Thesis. Narvik (2016).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andersson, M. Energy storage solutions for electric bus fast charging station. Cost optimization of grid connection and grid reinforcements. Master Thesis. Uppsala (2017).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gao, Z., Lin. Z., LaClair. T.J., Liu. C., Li. J.-M., Birky. A.K., Ward. J. Battery capacity and recharging needs for electric buses in city transit service. Energy 122, 588–600 (2017).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Perrotta, D., Macedo, J.L., Rossetti, R.J., Freire de Sousa, J., Kokkinogenis, Z., Ribeiro, B., Afonso, J.L. Route planning for electric buses: a case study in Oporto. In: Proceedings of the 16th Meeting of the EURO Working Group on Transportation, EWGT2013. pp. 1–11. Porto (2013).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heryana, G., Prasetya, S., Adhitya, M., Sumarsono, D. A. Power consumption analysis on large-sized electric bus. In: IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 105 012041, pp. 1–6 (2017).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kivekäs, K., Lajunen, A., Vepsäläinen, J. and Tammi, K. City Bus Powertrain Comparison: Driving Cycle Variation and Passenger Load Sensitivity Analysis. Energies 11 1755, 1–26 (2018).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mohamed, M., Farag, H., El-Taweel, N., Ferguson, M. Simulation of Electric Buses on a Full Transit Network: Operational Feasibility and Grid Impact Analysis. Electric Power Systems Research 142, 163–175 (2017).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Battery Electric Buses Smart Deployment,, last accessed 2018/11/02.
  13. 13.
    Göhlich, D., Kunith, A., Ly, T. Technology assessment of an electric urban bus system for Berlin. Urban Transport XX, 137–149 (2014).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fast Charge Battery Electric Transit Bus In-Use Fleet Evaluation (NREL/CP-5400-66098, May 2016),, last accessed 2018/11/07.
  15. 15.
    Fusco, G., Alessandrini, A., Colombaroni, C., Valentini, M. P. A model for transit design with choice of electric charging system. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 87, 234–249 (2013).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Algin, V. Approaches and Techniques for Calculating Real Reliability of Machine as a System of Different Dependent Components and Complicated Logic of Limiting States. In: Proceedings of 13th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, pp. 1–6. Guanajuato, México (2011).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Young K., Wang, C. Wang, L., Strunz, K. Chapter 2. Electric vehicle battery technologies. In: Electric vehicle integration into modern power networks, pp. 15–56, Springer (2013).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Algin, V., Czogalla, O., Kovalyov, M., Krawiec K., Chistov, S. Essential functionalities of ERA-NET Electric Mobility Europe PLATON project. Mechanics of Machines, Mechanisms and Materials 4(45), 17–28 (2018).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Paddubka, S., Algin, V., Starzhinsky, V., Shil’ko, S. Development of Mechanism and Machine Science in Belarus by an Example of Gears and Gear Transmissions. In: IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 393 012043, pp. 1–9 (2018).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Algin, V. B. Calculation of Mobile Technics: Kinematics, Dynamics, Lifetime, Belaruskaya Navuka, Minsk, Belarus (2014, in Russian).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Algin, V., Kim, H-E. Reliability and Life-time of Mechanical Units in Operation and Test. Key Engineering Materials 326-328, 549–552 (2006).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Joint Institute of Mechanical Engineering of NAS BelarusMinskBelarus

Personalised recommendations