A Floating Cable-Driven Robotic Manipulator in a Marine Environment

  • Mamon HoroubEmail author
  • Mahir Hassan
  • Muhammad Hawwa
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 73)


A cable-driven platform is designed, manufactured and tested in a water tank. The platform is operated by four cables anchored to the tank corners and controlled by actuators mounted on a cylindrical floating structure. Labview based experiments are conducted on the floating cable-driven parallel manipulator to measure tensions in the cables as it moves within its workspace. The platform is analyzed, in parallel, as a three degrees of freedom system within the framework of rigid-body dynamics, taking the influence of the surrounding water on the mass, stiffness, and damping matrices. A numerical model is established to calculate the tension in the cables as a function of the platform pose. Theoretical prediction and experimental results are found to agree fairly well.


Marine platforms Robotic manipulators Dynamic analysis Cable stiffness Workspace 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) for funding this work through project No. 11-ELE1623-04 as part of the National Science, Technology, and Innovation Plan. In addition to that, the authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by National Instrument Company. Also, the authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Ihab Al-Surakji of Al-Najah University for his help and support.


  1. 1.
    J. Albus, R. Bostelman, and N. Dagalakis, “The NIST robocrane,” Journal of Robotic Sys-tems, vol. 10, pp. 709-724, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Kawamura and K. Ito, “A new type of master robot for teleoperation using a radial wire drive system,” in Intelligent Robots and Systems’ 93, IROS’93. Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, 1993, pp. 55-60.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Ming and T. Higuchi, “Study on multiple degree-of-freedom positioning mechanism using wires. I: Concept, design and control,” International Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, vol. 28, pp. 131-138, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Kawamura, W. Choe, S. Tanaka, and S. R. Pandian, “Development of an ultrahigh speed robot FALCON using wire drive system,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1995, pp. 215-220.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. G. Roberts, T. Graham, and T. Lippitt, “On the inverse kinematics, statics, and fault toler-ance of cable‐suspended robots,” Journal of Robotic Systems, vol. 15, pp. 581-597, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Maeda, S. Tadokoro, T. Takamori, M. Hiller, and R. Verhoeven, “On design of a redundant wire-driven parallel robot WARP manipulator,” in Robotics and Automation, 1999. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on, 1999, pp. 895-900.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Ferraresi, M. Paoloni, S. Pastorelli, and F. Pescarmona, “A new 6‐DOF parallel robotic structure actuated by wires: The WiRo‐6.3,” Journal of Robotic Systems, vol. 21, pp. 581-595, 2004.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Mroz, Notash., L.(2004) “Wire-actuated Robots with a Constraining Linkage,” J. Robotic Systems, vol. 21, pp. 677-678.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Behzadipour and A. Khajepour, “A new cable-based parallel robot with three degrees of freedom,” Multibody System Dynamics, vol. 13, pp. 371-383, 2005.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Pusey, A. Fattah, S. Agrawal, and E. Messina, “Design and workspace analysis of a 6–6 cable-suspended parallel robot,” Mechanism and machine theory, vol. 39, pp. 761-778, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Stump and V. Kumar, “Workspaces of cable-actuated parallel manipulators,” Journal of Me-chanical Design, vol. 128, pp. 159-167, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. B. Pham, S. H. Yeo, G. Yang, M. S. Kurbanhusen, and I.-M. Chen, “Force-closure work-space analysis of cable-driven parallel mechanisms,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 41, pp. 53-69, 2006.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Bosscher, A. T. Riechel, and I. Ebert-Uphoff, “Wrench-feasible workspace generation for cable-driven robots,” Robotics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 22, pp. 890-902, 2006.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Gouttefarde and C. M. Gosselin, “Analysis of the wrench-closure workspace of planar parallel cable-driven mechanisms,” Robotics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 22, pp. 434-445, 2006.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    X. Diao and O. Ma, “Force-closure analysis of general 6-DOF cable manipulators,” in Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2007. IROS 2007. IEEE/RSJ International Conference, pp. 3931-3936, 2007.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Fang, D. Franitza, M. Torlo, F. Bekes, and M. Hiller, “Motion control of a tendon-based parallel manipulator using optimal tension distribution,” Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME Transactions, vol. 9, pp. 561-568, 2004.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Hassan and A. Khajepour, “Analysis of bounded cable tensions in cable-actuated parallel manipulators,” Robotics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 27, pp. 891-900, 2011.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Hassan and A. Khajepour, “Minimum-norm solution for the actuator forces in cable-based parallel manipulators based on convex optimization,” in Robotics and Automation, 2007 IEEE International Conference, pp. 1498-1503, 2007.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Horoub, M. Hassan, M. Hawwa, “Work-space Analysis of a Floating Cable-Driven Plat-form for Marine Applications,”Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronics, 2013.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Horoub, M. Hassan, M. Hawwa, “Dynamic Analysis of a Floating Cable-driven Platform for Marine Applications,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronics, Paper No. 153, 2014.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Horoub and M. Hawwa, “Analysis of a Spar Platform with Various Mooring System Configurations Under the Influence of Water Waves,” International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 27(03), pp.283-292, 2017.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Horoub, M. Hassan, and M. Hawwa, “Work-space analysis of a Gough-Stewart type cable marine platform subjected to harmonic water waves,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, 120, pp.314-325, 2018.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Horoub and M. Hawwa. “Influence of cables layout on the dynamic workspace of a six-DOF parallel marine manipulator.” Mechanism and Machine Theory, 129 (2018): 191-201.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. Horoub, K. Sikandar, A. Sajid, and A. Horoub. “Comparative Analysis of a Floating Mooring Line-Driven Platform (FMDP) Having Different Mooring Lines Patterns.”, 9th International Conference on Mechanical and Aero-space Engineering (ICMAE), pp. 269-273. IEEE, 2018.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. Mansouri, H. Hadidi, “Comprehensive study on the linear hydrodynamic analysis of a truss spar in random waves”,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 53: 930-942, 2009.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    X. Chen, J. Zhang, & W. Ma, “On dynamic coupling effects between a spar and its mooring lines,” Ocean Engineering, 28, 7:863-887, 2001.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    K. Drake, “An analytical approximation for the horizontal drift force acting on a deep draught spar in regular waves,” Ocean Engineering, 38, 5:810-814, 2011.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    O. Montasir, V. Kurian, “Effect of slowly varying drift forces on the motion characteristics of truss spar platforms,” Ocean Engineering, 38, 13: 1417-1429, 2011.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Yang, B. Teng, D. Ning, Z. Shi, “Coupled dynamic analysis for wave interaction with a truss spar and its mooring line/riser system in time domain,” Ocean Engineering, 39: 72-87, 2012.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    O. Montasir, A.Yenduri, V. Kurian, “Effect of mooring line conequrations on the dynamic responses of truss spar platforms,” Ocean Engineering, 96: 161-172, 2015.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    L.-W. Tsai, Robot analysis: the mechanics of serial and parallel manipulators: John Wiley & Sons, 1999.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    O. Faltinsen, “Sea loads on ships and offshore structures,” vol. 1: Cambridge university press, 1993.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    J. N. Newman, Marine hydrodynamics: MIT press, 1977.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. Milgram, “Strip theory for underwater vehicles in water of finite depth,” Journal of Engineering Mathematics 58, no. 1-4: 31-50, 2007.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. Hassan and A. Khajepour, “Analysis of a large-workspace cable-actuated manipulator for warehousing applications,” in ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2009, pp. 45-53.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. Agarwal and A. Jain, “Nonlinear coupled dynamic response of offshore Spar platforms under regular sea waves,” Ocean engineering, vol. 30, pp. 517-551, 2003.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    S. Chandrasekaran and A. Jain, “Dynamic behaviour of square and triangular offshore tension leg platforms under regular wave loads,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 29, pp. 279-313, 2002.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    J.-y. Gu, J.-m. Yang, and H.-n. Lv, “Studies of TLP dynamic response under wind, waves and current,” China Ocean Engineering, vol. 26, pp. 363-378, 2012.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    M. Jameel, S. Ahmad, A. S. Islam, and M. Z. Jumaat, “Non-linear dynamic analysis of coupled spar platform,” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, vol. 19, pp. 476-491, 2013.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    I. Anan, Evaluation of the dynamic response of Spar platforms, 2000.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    O. Montasir, A.Yenduri, V. Kurian, Effect of mooring line con equrations on the dynamic responses of truss spar platforms, Ocean Engineering, 2015, 96: 161-172.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    P. Johnson, Spar model test Joint Industry Project final report: Project summary, Report of Offshore Technology Research Center, vol. 1, 1995.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    A. K. Jha, P. De Jong, S. R. Winterstein, Motions of a spar buoy in random seas: Comparing predictions and model test results, Proc., BOSS-97, vol. 2, pp. 333-347, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKing Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsDhahranKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations