A Lumped Model for Dynamic Behavior Prediction of a Hybrid Robot for Optical Polishing
Abstract
Combining screw theory with rigid/flexible body dynamics, this paper presents a lumped model for predicting lower-order dynamic behaviors of a hybrid robot for optical polishing. The model is built upon two assumptions: (1) the kinetic energy arising from elastic deformation of a limb-body within parallel mechanism is negligible if it also undergoes the rigid-body idle motion; and (2) the lower-order dynamics of the wrist is primarily dominated by the torsional compliances of two revolute joints. These assumptions lead to a 6-DOF dynamic model that enables the pose-varying dynamic behaviors to be predicted in an effective manner. The computational accuracy of the model is validated via simulations, illustrating the suitability to use the hybrid robot to perform optical polishing operations.
Keywords
Hybrid robot Dynamic behavior prediction Optical polishingPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Acknowledgments
This work is partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 51622508, 51420105007 and 51721003) and EU H2020-RISE-ECSASDP (grant 734272).
References
- 1.Rupp, W.: Conventional optical polishing techniques. Int. J. Opt. 18(1), 1-16 (1971).Google Scholar
- 2.Wang, W. and Yu, G. and Xu, M. and Walker, D.: Coordinate transformation of an industrial robot and its application in deterministic optical polishing. Opt. Eng. 53(5), 1-6 (2014).Google Scholar
- 3.http://www.loxin2002.com/t605-6-five-six-axis-machine, last accessed 2018/12/11.
- 4.Briot, S. and Pashkevich, A. and Chablat, D.: Reduced elastodynamic modelling of parallel robots for the computation of their natural frequencies. In: 13th World Congress in Mechanism & Machine Science, pp. 12-358, Guanajuato, México (2011).Google Scholar
- 5.Law, M. and Ihlenfeldt, S. and Wabner, M. and Altintas, Y. and Neugebauer, R.: Positiondependent dynamics and stability of serial-parallel kinematic machines. Annals of the CIRP 62(1), 375-378 (2013).Google Scholar
- 6.Cammarata, A. and Condorelli, D. and Sinatra, R.: An algorithm to study the elastodynamics of parallel kinematic machines with lower kinematic pairs. ASME J. Mech. Robot. 5(1), 1-9 (2013).Google Scholar
- 7.Zhang, J. and Dai, J. S. and Huang, T.: Characteristic equation-based dynamic analysis of a three-revolute prismatic spherical parallel kinematic machine. ASME J. Comput. Nonlin. Dyn. 10(2), 1-13 (2015).Google Scholar
- 8.Zhang, J. and Zhao, Y. Q. and Ceccarelli, M.: Elastodynamic model-based vibration characteristics prediction of a three-prismatic-revolute-spherical parallel kinematic machine. ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Measur. -Contr. 138(4), 1-14 (2016).Google Scholar
- 9.Wu, L. and Wang, G. and Liu, H. and Huang, T.: An approach for elastodynamic modeling of hybrid robots based on substructure synthesis technique. Mech. Mach. Theory 123, 124-136 (2018).Google Scholar
- 10.Chen, G. and Rui, X. and Abbas, L. and Wang, G. and Yang, F. and Zhu, W.: A novel method for the dynamic modeling of stewart parallel mechanism. Mech. Mach. Theory 126, 397-412 (2018).Google Scholar
- 11.Huang, T. and Yang, S. and Wang, M. and Sun, T. and Chetwynd D. G.: An approach to determining the unknown twist/wrench subspaces of lower mobility serial kinematic chains. ASME J. Mech. Robot. 7(3), 1-9 (2015).Google Scholar
- 12.Wang, Y. and Liu, H. and Huang, T. and Chetwynd, D. G.: Stiffness modeling of the Tricept robot using the overall Jacobian matrix. ASME J. Mech. Robot. 1(1), 795-810 (2009).Google Scholar
- 13.Guyan, R. J.: Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices. Aiaa J. 3(2), 380-380 (1965).Google Scholar