Advertisement

Heuristic Method of Evaluating Accessibility of Mobile in Selected Applications for Air Quality Monitoring

  • Patricia Acosta-VargasEmail author
  • Luis Salvador-Ullauri
  • Jorge Luis Pérez-Medina
  • Rasa Zalakeviciute
  • Wilmar Hernandez
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 959)

Abstract

At present, advances in technology, the use of smartphones and access to the Internet pose significant challenges in the area of accessibility of mobile applications. This study identified the lack of clear policies and methods for assessing accessibility in apps as a significant challenge for web accessibility experts.

On the other hand, the heuristic evaluation concept proposed by Nielsen and Molich is an inspection method based on the evaluation of an interactive system. To reduce accessibility barriers, in this research we propose a heuristic method based on Brajnik’s Barrier Walkthrough. The method helps to propose some improvements to evaluate accessibility in mobile applications between a heuristic method and the Web Content Accessibility Guide 2.1. As a case study, we applied this evaluation to users with low vision who use mobile applications under the Android operating system that helps users monitor the air we breathe. The results of this research can help future works about the development of accessible mobile applications.

Keywords

Accessibility Air Applications Evaluation Heuristic method Monitoring Mobile Quality WCAG 2.1 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The researchers thank Universidad de Las Américas (Ecuador) for funding this study through the project “CEPRA XII-2018-13”.

References

  1. 1.
    Cisco: Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2017–2022 white paper. Cisco. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/white-paper-c11-738429.html
  2. 2.
    ESCAP: Disability at a glance 2015: strengthening the evidence base in Asia and the Pacific (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2015-en
  3. 3.
    World Health Organization (WHO): United Nations expert group meeting on building inclusive society and development through promoting ICT accessibility: emerging issues and trends (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bourne, R.R., Flaxman, S.R., Braithwaite, T., Cicinelli, M.V., Das, A., Jonas, J.B., Naidoo, K.: Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 5(9), e888–e897 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109X(17)30293-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Díaz-Bossini, J.M., Moreno, L.: Accessibility to mobile interfaces for older people. Procedia Comput. Sci. 27, 57–66 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nielsen, J., Rolf, M.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 249–256 (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brajnik, G., Yesilada, Y., Harper, S.: Guideline aggregation: web accessibility evaluation for older users. In: International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, pp. 127–135 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1535654.1535686
  8. 8.
    Yesilada, Y., Brajnik, G., Harper, S.: Barriers common to mobile and disabled web users. Interact. Comput. 23, 525–542 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/
  10. 10.
    World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
  11. 11.
    Acosta-Vargas, P.: Framework for accessibility evaluation of hospital websites. In: International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG), pp. 9–15. IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Acosta-Vargas, P., Lujan-Mora, S., Salvador-Ullauri, L.: Web accessibility polices of higher education institutions. In: 2017 16th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), pp. 1–7 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Introduction to Web Accessibility—Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-intro/
  14. 14.
    Acosta-Vargas, P., Zalakeviciute, R., Luján-Mora, S., Hernandez, W.: Accessibility evaluation of mobile applications for monitoring air quality, pp. 1–11. Springer, Cham (2019)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Acosta-Vargas, P., Luján-Mora, S., Acosta, T., Salvador-Ullauri, L.: Toward a combined method for evaluation of web accessibility. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 602–613 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Acosta-Vargas, P., Acosta, T., Luján-mora, S.: Challenges to assess accessibility in higher education websites: a comparative study of Latin America Universities. IEEE Access 6, 36500–36508 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2848978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grellmann, B., Neate, T., Roper, A., Wilson, S., Marshall, J.: Investigating mobile accessibility guidance for people with aphasia. In: Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 410–413. ACM (2018)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wilson, A., Crabb, M.: W3C accessibility guidelines for mobile games. Comput. Games J. 7, 49–61 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40869-018-0058-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yan, S., Ramachandran, P.G.: The current status of accessibility in mobile apps. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 12, 1–31 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3300176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Brajnik, G.: Ranking websites through prioritized web accessibility barriers. In: Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference, pp. 1–8 (2007). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.79.6853&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  22. 22.
    Ferreira, C., Ferreira, S., Sacramento, C.: Mobile application accessibility in the context of visually impaired users. In: Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 32. ACM (2018)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yesilada, Y., Brajnik, G., Harper, S.: How much does expertise matter? In: Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS 2009, p. 203 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1639642.1639678

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Acosta-Vargas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luis Salvador-Ullauri
    • 2
  • Jorge Luis Pérez-Medina
    • 1
  • Rasa Zalakeviciute
    • 1
  • Wilmar Hernandez
    • 1
  1. 1.Intelligent and Interactive Systems LabUniversidad de Las AméricasQuitoEcuador
  2. 2.Centro de Educación ContinuaEscuela Politécnica NacionalQuitoEcuador

Personalised recommendations