Background and Introduction

  • Edie West


Contemporary nursing undoubtedly compares favourably with other professions if one judges by the standards of public service, idealism and professional solidarity. Yet entire volumes have been written on the medical profession’s contributions to the miracles of surgery or the triumphs over infectious diseases, whereas hardly a word has been written on the nurse’s contributions towards this progress [1]. Though it could be argued that much has been written about nursing since Dock made this statement in 1932, if the passing reference made by Drake (2001) in The History of Appalachia, which referred to the Frontier Nursing Service as a “mission” while simultaneously lauding Lexington’s “prominent physician’s” is any indication of what is being written, then one could question the value placed upon nurses and nursing by the general public [2]. Furthermore, the discipline has historically been modest, self-effacing and not fully cognizant of the role their profession has played in the modern warfare against disease [3]. The need for professional nurses to honor their own work, attain recognition from physicians and the general public and rid themselves once and for all of this notion that they are compelled to work under the constant eye of physicians and automatically carry out their orders is certainly not new. However, it is a need that has yet to be fully satisfied.


  1. 1.
    Dock L. A short history of nursing. London: Putnam’s Sons; 1932. p. 1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drake R. History of Appalachia. Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky; 2003. p. xiv.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buresch B, Gordon S. From silence to voice: what nurses know and must communicate to the public. Ottawa: Canadian Nurses Association; 2000. p. xv.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Snavely T. A brief economic analysis of the looming nursing shortage in the United States. Nurs Econ. 2016;34(2):98–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    American Association of Colleges of Nurses. About the nursing shortage. 2019. Accessed 1 Jan 2019.
  6. 6.
    Buchan M, O’May F, Gilles D. Nursing workforce policy and the economic crisis: a global overview. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2013;.
  7. 7.
    Baly M. Nursing and social change. 3rd ed. London: Routledge; 1995. p. 56.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goodnow N. Outlines of nursing history. New York: Saunders; 1921. p. 11.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dock. A short history of nursing. London: Putnam’s Sons; 1932. p. 117.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bullough V. Emergence of modern nursing. London: Croom Helm; 1979.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abramson R, Haskell J. Encyclopaedia of Appalachia. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press; 2006. p. 151.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Breckinridge M. Wide neighborhoods: a story of the Frontier Nursing Service. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky; 1952.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dodge B. The story of nursing. Boston: Little, Brown & Company; 1965.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frontier Nursing Service, Inc. History information. FNS website. 1925–2008. Accessed 10 May 2007.
  15. 15.
    Gardner C. Cleaver Country: Kentucky mountain trails. New York: Fleming H. Revell; 1931.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Newton ME. The case for historical research. Nur Res. 1965;14(1):20–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fasoli D. The culture of nursing engagement: a historical perspective. Nurs Adm Q. 2010;34(1):18–29. Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lewis S. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Health Promot Pract. 2015;16(4). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oral History Association. OHA principles and best practice. 2019. Accessed 1 Jan 2019.
  20. 20.
    Abrams L. Oral history theory. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2016. p. 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Streubert H, Carpenter D. Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative. 5th ed. New York: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2011.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tosh J. The pursuit of history aims, methods and new directions in the study of history. 6th ed. London: Routledge; 2015. p. 198.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith J. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. 3rd ed. New York: Sage; 2015.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bates D, Plog F. Cultural anthropology. 3rd ed. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill College; 1990.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ryan R, Deci E. On assimilating identities to the self: a self-determination theory perspective on internalization and integrity within cultures. In: Leary MR, Tangney JP, editors. Handbook of self and identity. New York: Guilford; 2003. p. 253–72.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Martin J. Cultures in organizations: three perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 42.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Martin J. Cultures in organizations: three perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 159.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Martin J. Cultures in organizations: three perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 150.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Puckett A. Seldom ask, never tell: labour & discourse in Appalachia. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 31.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schultz M, Hatch MJ, Larson MH. The expressive organization: linking identity, reputation and the corporate brand. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 13.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    West E. British and American Frontier Nursing Service (FNS) nurses (1950-1960s): oral history narratives on nursing. J Oral Hist Soc. 2007;2:35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edie West
    • 1
  1. 1.Indiana University of PennsylvaniaIndianaUSA

Personalised recommendations