Advertisement

Discerning the Call of the Spirit to Theological-Ecclesial Renewal: Notes on Being Reasonable and Responsible in Receptive Ecumenical Learning

  • Paul D. MurrayEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Pathways for Ecumenical and Interreligious Dialogue book series (PEID)

Abstract

This chapter engages directly with the overall theme of the volume, Leaning into the Spirit: Ecumenical Perspectives on Discernment and Decision-making in the Church. It does this by drilling down into what has rightly been identified as a crucial area requiring further attention and articulation within Receptive Ecumenical thought and practice: the need for clarity as to what it means to discern well the appropriateness and viability of a possible instance of receptive learning by one tradition from another. The chapter starts out by recognizing the affinity between Receptive Ecumenism and Spiritual Ecumenism, with Receptive Ecumenism properly being understood as a movement of attempted receptivity of and responsiveness to the movement of the Spirit in the lives of the churches. The specificity of Receptive Ecumenism is presented as consisting in its pursuing this basic orientation in explicitly theological and ecclesial-institutional modes; focused on the need for rigorous theological visioning and scrutiny in service of effective and significant ecclesial reform. Accordingly, the main concern of the chapter is to articulate and provide justification for the principles in accordance with which such theological visioning and scrutinizing should be pursued.

References

  1. ARCIC III. 2018. Walking Together on the Way: Learning to Be the Church – Local, Regional, and Universal. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
  2. Congar, Yves. 2011. Part Two. Conditions for Authentic Reform without Schism. In True and False Reform in the Church, trans. Paul Philibert. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
  3. Edwards, Denis. 2009. Receptive Ecumenism and the Charism of a Partner Church: The Example of Justification. In Australasian Catholic Record, vol. 86, 457–467.Google Scholar
  4. Henn OFM Cap, William. 1987a. The Hierarchy of Truths According to Yves Congar, O.P. Roma: Editrice Pontificia Universita Gregoriana.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1987b. The Hierarchy of Truths Twenty Years Later. Theological Studies 48: 439–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. International Theological Commission. 2014. Sensus Fidei in the Life of the Church. Available at: http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_cti_20140610_sensus-fidei_en.html
  7. Murray, Paul D. 1998. Theology After the Demise of Foundationalism. The Way 38: 160–169.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2004. Reason, Truth and Theology in Pragmatist Perspective. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2006. On Valuing Truth in Practice: Rome’s Postmodern Challenge. The International Journal of Systematic Theology 8: 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2007a. On Valuing Truth in Practice: Rome’s Postmodern Challenge. In Redeeming Truth: Considering Faith and Reason, ed. Laurence Paul Hemming and Susan Frank Parsons, 184–206. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2007b. Receptive Ecumenism and Catholic Learning: Establishing the Agenda. The International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church 7: 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 2008a. Preface. In Receptive Ecumenism and the Call to Catholic Learning: Exploring a Way for Contemporary Ecumenism, ed. Paul D. Murray, ix–xv. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2008b. Receptive Ecumenism and Catholic Learning: Establishing the Agenda. In Receptive Ecumenism and the Call to Catholic Learning: Exploring a Way for Contemporary Ecumenism, ed. Paul D. Murray, 5–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2012. Discerning the Dynamics of Doctrinal Development in Postfoundationalist Perspective. In Faithful Reading: Essays in Honour of Fergus Kerr, ed. Simon Oliver, Karen Kilby, and Thomas O’Loughlin, 193–220. London/New York: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2014. Searching the Living Truth of the Church in Practice: On the Transformative Task of Systematic Ecclesiology. Modern Theology 30: 251–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2018a. Receptive Ecumenism as a Leaning-in to the Spirit of Loving Transformation. In Receptive Ecumenism: Listening, Learning, and Loving in the Way of Christ, ed. Vicky Balabanski and Geraldine Hawkes, xv–xxiii. Adelaide: ATF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2018b. Receiving of Christ in the Spirit: The Pneumatic-Christic Depths of Receptive Ecumenism. In Receptive Ecumenism: Listening, Learning, and Loving in the Way of Christ, ed. Vicky Balabanski and Geraldine Hawkes, 157–170. Adelaide: ATF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2018c. Living Catholicity Differently: On Growing into the Plenitudinous Plurality of Catholic Communion in God. In Envisioning Futures for the Catholic Church, Cultural Heritage and Contemporary Change Series VIII, Christian Philosophical Studies 23, ed. Staf Hellemans and Peter Jonkers, 109–158. Washington, DC: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.Google Scholar
  19. Murray, Paul D., and Andrea L. Murray. 2012. The Roots, Range, and Reach of Receptive Ecumenism. In Unity in Process: Reflections on Ecumenism, ed. Clive Barrett, 79–94. London: DLT.Google Scholar
  20. Newman, John Henry. 1877. Preface to the Third Edition. In The Via Media of the Anglican Church, 3rd ed. London: Longmans, Green, & Co.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 1878. An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine. 2nd ed. London: Pickering.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1961. On Consulting the Faithful in Matters of Doctrine. Ed. John Coulson. London/Kansas City: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1970. The Letters and Diaries of John Henry Newman, XX. Ed. Charles Stephen Dessain. London: Thomas NelsonGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. 1974. An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine. Ed. J.M. Cameron. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. Noonan, John T. 2006. A Church that Can and cannot Change: The Development of Catholic Moral Teaching. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  26. Örsy, Ladislas SJ. 2008. Authentic Learning and Receiving – A Search for Criteria. In Receptive Ecumenism and the Call to Catholic Learning: Exploring a Way for Contemporary Ecumenism, ed. Paul D. Murray. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 5-25.39-51.Google Scholar
  27. Pizzey, Antonia. 2019. Receptive Ecumenism and the Renewal of the Ecumenical Movement: The Path of Ecclesial Conversion. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  28. Pope Francis. 2015. Address Commemorating the 50th Anniversary of the Institution of the Synod of Bishops. October 17, at: http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/speeches/2015/october/documents/papa-francesco_20151017_50-anniversario-sinodo.html
  29. Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1951. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. The Philosophical Review 60: 20–43.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 1961. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. In From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays, 2nd ed., 20–46. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 1970. The Web of Belief. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  32. Rush, Ormond. 1993. Reception Hermeneutics and the “Development” of Doctrine: An Alternative Model. Pacifica 6: 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. ———. 1997. The Reception of Doctrine: An Appropriation of Hans Robert Jauss’ Reception Aesthetics and Literary Hermeneutics. Roma: Pontificia Università Gregoriana.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 2004. Still Interpreting Vatican II: Some Hermeneutical Principles. Mahwah: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 2009. The Eyes of Faith: The Sense of the Faithful and the Church’s Reception of Revelation. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2017a. Inverting the Pyramid: The Sensus Fidelium in a Synodal Church. Theological Studies 78: 299–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. ———. 2017b. Receptive Ecumenism and Discerning the Sensus Fidelium: Expanding the Categories for a Catholic Reception of Revelation. Theological Studies 78: 559–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ryan, Gregory A. 2018a. Receptive Integrity and the Dynamics of Doctrine: A Study in the Hermeneutics of Catholic Ecclesial Learning. Unpublished PhD thesis, Durham University.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2018b. Receiving with Dynamic Integrity: Ecumenical Commitments and Reception Hermeneutics. In Receptive Ecumenism: Listening, Learning, and Loving in the Way of Christ, ed. Vicki Balabanksi and Geraldine Hawkes, 135–148. Adelaide: ATF Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ———. 2020. Receptive Integrity: The Dynamics of Doctrine in a Learning Church. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  41. Sullivan, Francis. 1996. Creative Fidelity: Weighing and Interpreting Documents of the Magisterium. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Tanner, Kathryn. 1997. Theories of Culture: A New Agenda for Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
  43. Thiel, John E. 2000. Dramatic Development as a Sense of Tradition. In Senses of Tradition: Continuity and Development in Catholic Faith. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Tilley, Terrence W. 2000. Inventing Catholic Tradition. Maryknoll/New York: Orbis.Google Scholar
  45. Wijlens, Myriam. 2017. Reforming the Church by Hitting the Reset Button: Reconfiguring Collegiality within Synodality because of sensus fidei fidelium. The Canonist 8: 235–261.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Durham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations