Advertisement

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • Linus Nnabuike Malu
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Compromise after Conflict book series (PSCAC)

Abstract

This chapter presents the important issues from the discussions of the interventions of the ICC in Kenya, Uganda and Côte d’Ivoire, as well as the causes and nature of the violent conflicts, the review of literature, and the analysis of the major findings of the study to provide a synthesis of the arguments proffered in this book. It summarises the research findings, outlines the major recommendations, acknowledges the limitations of the study and closes with a final observation. The book demonstrated how the decisions to intervene and the actual interventions can change the dynamics in a post-conflict situation. It also explored the tensions of deploying an international Court in a national setting, which unearths the complexities and challenges of the contest between international accountability and state sovereignty.

Keywords

ICC intervention Slow pace of justice African Union Partial justice Transitional justice mechanisms Amnesty Investigations Prosecutions 

References

  1. Clamp, Kerry. 2014. Restorative Justice in Transition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Fletcher, Laurel, and Weinstein Harvey. 2002. “Violence and Social Repair: Rethinking the Contributions of Justice to Reconciliation”. Human Rights Quarterly 24: 573–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Goldston, James. 2016. “Three Lessons from the ICC’s Kenya Debacle. Open Society Foundation”. Open Society Foundation, April 6. Accessed April 15, 2016. https://medium.com/open-society-foundations/three-lessons-from-the-icc-s-kenya-debacle-515df408531b.
  4. Human Rights Watch. 2015. “Making Justice Count: Lessons from the ICC Work in Cote d’ Ivoire”. Human Rights Watch Report. Accessed September 21, 2015. https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/08/04/making-justice-count/lessons-iccs-workcote-divoire.
  5. Human Rights Watch. 2016. “To Consolidate this Peace of Ours.” Human Rights Watch Report. Accessed February 28, 2016. http://www.hrw.org/report/2015/12/08/consolidate-peace-ours/human-rights-agenda-cote-divoire.
  6. Jurdi, Nidal Nabil. 2011. The International Criminal Court and National Courts: A Contentious Relationship. Surry: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  7. Mendez, Juan, and Kelly Jeremy. 2015. “Peace Making, Justice and the ICC”. In Contested Justice: The Politics and Practice of International Criminal Court Interventions, edited by Christian de Vos, Sara Kendall, and Caesten Stahn, 479–496. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Rigney, Sophie. 2014. “Unsettled Times at The Hague”. Accessed November 19, 2014. http;//insidestory.org.au/unsettled-times-at-the-hague.
  9. Schabas, William. 2001. “International Law Responses to Conflict”. In Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict, edited by Chester Croaker, Fen Hampson, and Pamela Aall, 603–618. Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace.Google Scholar
  10. Schabas, Williams. 2012. Unimaginable Atrocities: Justice, Politics, and Rights at the War Crimes Tribunals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Williams, Sarah. 2012. Hybrid and Internationalized Criminal Tribunals: Selected Jurisdictional Issues. Oregon: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linus Nnabuike Malu
    • 1
  1. 1.International Law ConsultantArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations