Advertisement

Identity in Motion and in Dialogue

  • Birgit Poopuu
Chapter
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)

Abstract

This chapter delineates the context-sensitive frame of analysis utilised to interrogate the EU’s CSDP identity. Against a backdrop of linguistic and practice turns I argue for an approach that combines the valuable insights of both. The telling and acting frame—meaning in use—nuances the subject matter of the EU’s missions as it sheds light on the Union’s expressive realm, that is to say, how the EU speaks and acts peace. The second analytical move introduced is the idea that dialogue is the cardinal logic for understanding identity. The key argument here is that identity should be studied in dialogue with the contextual dynamics and the multiple others. Finally, the interpretivist logic that undergirds this work is presented.

Keywords

Identity Telling and acting Discourse and practice turns Dialogue Interpretive methodology 

References

  1. Adichie, Chimamanda Ngozi. 2009. “Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie: The Danger of a Single Story.” TEDGlobal Conference. https://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story/transcript?language=en.
  2. Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot, eds. 2011. International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aradau, Claudia. 2010. “Security That Matters: Critical Infrastructure and Objects of Protection.” Security Dialogue 41 (5): 491–514.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610382687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The Human Condition. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ashton, Catherine. 2010. “Address by Catherine Ashton at the Joint Debate on Foreign and Security Policy—European Parliament Plenary.” Strasbourg. In EU Security and Defence: Core Documents 2010, vol. XI, March 10, compiled by Catherine Glière. Paris: EUISS. https://www.iss.europa.eu/content/european-union-security-and-defence-core-documents-2010.
  6. Autesserre, Séverine. 2014. Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Badiou, Alain. 2012. Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil. Translated and introduced by Peter Hallward. London: Verso. Kindle edition.Google Scholar
  8. Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Edited by Michael Holquist. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bakhtin, M. M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Edited by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Translated by Vern W. McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  10. Barkawi, Tarak, and Mark Laffey. 2006. “The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies.” Review of International Studies 32 (2): 329–352.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210506007054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bono, Giovanna. 2006. “The Perils of Conceiving of EU Foreign Policy as a ‘Civilising Force.’” Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft 1: 150–163. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/ipg/03647.pdf.
  12. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. “Social Space and Symbolic Power.” Sociological Theory 7 (1): 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buckley-Zistel, Susanne. 2006. “In-Between War and Peace: Identities, Boundaries and Change After Violent Conflict.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 35 (1): 3–21.  https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298060350010101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bueger, Christian. 2014. “Pathways to Practice: Praxiography and IR.” European Political Science Review 6 (3): 383–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1755773913000167.
  15. Bueger, Christian. 2015. “Making Things Known: Epistemic Practice, the United Nations and the Translation of Piracy.” International Political Sociology 9 (1): 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bueger, Christian, and Frank Gadinger. 2007. “Culture, Terror and Practice in International Relations: An Invitation to Practice Theory.” Paper Prepared for the Workshop “The (Re-)turn to Practice: Thinking Practices in International Relations and Security Studies,” May 18–19. Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Bueger, Christian, and Frank Gadinger. 2014. International Practice Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Bueger, Christian, and Frank Gadinger. 2015. “The Play of International Practice.” International Studies Quarterly 59 (3): 449–460.  https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bueger, Christian, and Trine Villumsen. 2007. “Beyond the Gap: Relevance, Fields of Practice and the Securitising Consequences of (Democratic Peace) Research.” Journal of International Relations and Development 10 (4): 417–448.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Butler, Judith. 1992. “Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of ‘Postmodernism.’” In Feminists Theorise the Political, edited by Judith Butler and Joan W. Scott, 3–21. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  22. Butler, Judith. 2011. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  23. Cebeci, Münevver. 2012. “European Foreign Policy Research Reconsidered: Constructing an ‘Ideal Power Europe’ Through Theory?” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 40 (3): 563–583.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812442235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chilton, Paul A., and Christina Schäffner. 2002. “Introduction: Themes and Principles in the Analysis of Political Discourse.” In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, edited by Paul A. Chilton and Christina Schäffner, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  25. Debrix, François, ed. 2003. Language, Agency, and Politics in a Constructed World. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  26. De Certeau, Michel. 1988. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Dépelteau, François, ed. 2018. The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Diez, Thomas. 2005. “Constructing the Self and Changing Others: Reconsidering ‘Normative Power Europe.’” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33 (3): 613–636.  https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330031701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Doty, Roxanne. 1996. Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  30. Doty, Roxanne. 1997. “Aporia: A Critical Exploration of the Agent-Structure Problematique in International Relations Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 3 (3): 365–392.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066197003003004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Epstein, Charlotte. 2008. The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-whaling Discourse. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Epstein, Charlotte. 2010. “Who Speaks? Discourse, the Subject and the Study of Identity in International Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 17 (2): 327–350.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109350055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Epstein, Charlotte. 2013. “Constructivism or the Eternal Return of Universals in International Relations: Why Returning to Language Is Vital for Prolonging the Owl’s Flight.” European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 499–519.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Erskine, Toni. 2010. “Normative IR Theory.” In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, edited by Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, 2nd ed., 36–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Escobar, Arturo. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Fierke, Karin. 1996. “Multiple Identities, Interfacing Games: The Social Construction of Western Action in Bosnia.” European Journal of International Relations 2 (4): 467–497.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066196002004003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fierke, Karin. 2002. “Links Across the Abyss: Language and Logic in IR.” International Studies Quarterly 46 (3): 331–354.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.00236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fierke, Karin. 2010. “Wittgenstein and International Relations Theory.” In International Relations Theory and Philosophy: Interpretive Dialogues, edited by Cerwyn Moore and Chris Farrands, 83–94. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Fierke, Karin. 2013a. “Is There Life Beyond Language? Discourses of Security.” Paper Presented at the ISA Annual Conference, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  40. Fierke, Karin. 2013b. Political Self-Sacrifice: Agency, Body and Emotion in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Fierke, Karin, and Knud E. Jørgensen. 2001. Constructing IR: The Next Generation. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  42. Foucault, Michel. 1997a. “History of Systems of Thought.” In Michel Foucault: Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, edited by Donald F. Bouchard, 199–204. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. Foucault, Michel. 1997b. “Sex, Power, and the Politics of Identity.” In Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth by Michel Foucault: The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984, edited by Paul Rabinow, vol. 1, 163–173. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  44. Foucault, Michel. 1997c. “Polemics, Politics, and Problematisations.” In Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth by Michel Foucault: The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984, edited by Paul Rabinow, vol. 1, 111–119. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  45. Foucault, Michel. 2002. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  46. Frueh, Jamie. 2004. “Studying Continuity and Change in South African Political Identity.” In Identity and Global Politics: Empirical and Theoretical Elaborations, edited by Patricia M. Goff and Kevin C. Dunn, 63–78. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Glynos, Jason, David Howarth, Aletta Norval, and Ewen Speed. 2009. “Discourse Analysis: Varieties and Methods.” Working Paper. National Centre for Research Methods. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/796/.
  48. Goff, Patricia M., and Kevin C. Dunn, eds. 2004. Identity and Global Politics: Empirical and Theoretical Elaborations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Guillaume, Xavier. 2011. International Relations and Identity: A Dialogical Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Hamati-Ataya, Inanna. 2010. “Knowing and Judging in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Reflexive Challenge.” Review of International Studies 36 (4): 1079–1101.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210510000550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hamati-Ataya, Inanna. 2012. “Reflectivity, Reflexivity, Reflexivism: IR’s ‘Reflexive Turn’—and Beyond.” European Journal of International Relations 19 (4): 669–694.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066112437770. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hamati-Ataya, Inanna. 2014. “Outline of a Reflexive Epistemology.” Epistemology & Philosophy of Science 42 (4): 46–66.  https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201442470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hansen, Lene. 2000. “The Little Mermaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29 (2): 285–306.  https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290020501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hansen, Lene. 2006. Security as a Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Hansen, Lene. 2011. “Performing Practices: A Poststructuralist Analysis of the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 280–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Hellmüller, Sara. 2013. “The Power of Perceptions: Localising International Peacebuilding Approaches.” International Peacekeeping 20 (2): 219–232.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2013.791570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hobson, John M. 2012. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 17602010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Hobson, John M., and Alina Sajed. 2017. “Navigating Beyond the Eurofetishist Frontier of Critical IR Theory: Exploring the Complex Landscapes of Non-Western Agency.” International Studies Review 19 (4): 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Holquist, Michael. 2002. Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Jackson, Patrick T. 2004. “Whose Identity? Rhetorical Commonplaces in ‘American’ Wartime Foreign Policy.” In Identity and Global Politics: Empirical and Theoretical Elaborations, edited by Patricia M. Goff and Kevin C. Dunn, 169–189. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  61. Jackson, Patrick T. 2011. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Khalili, Laleh. 2010. “The Ethics of Social Science Research.” In Critical Research in the Social Sciences: A Transdisciplinary East-West Handbook, edited by Roger Heacock and Edouard Conte, 65–82. Ramallah: Birzeit University.Google Scholar
  63. Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2011. “Making Sense of ‘International Practices’.” In International Practices, edited by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 36–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Kurikkala, Flora. 2003.“Representation of the Changing Self: An EU Performance in the Middle East.” PhD diss., University of Tampere.Google Scholar
  65. Kurowska, Xymena. 2008. “The Role of ESDP Operations.” In European Security and Defence Policy: An Implementation Perspective, edited by Michael Merlingen and Rasa Ostrauskaite, 25–42. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Kurowska, Xymena. 2012. “Introduction: The Role of Theory in Research on Common Security and Defence Policy.” In Explaining the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy: Theory in Action, edited by Xymena Kurowska and Fabian Breuer, 1–15. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  67. Kuus, Merje. 2014. Geopolitics and Experience: Knowledge and Authority in European Diplomacy. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  68. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  69. Laffey, Mark, and Jutta Weldes. 2004. “Methodological Reflections on Discourse Analysis.” Qualitative Methods 2 (1): 28–30.Google Scholar
  70. Lebow, Richard Ned. 2012. The Politics and Ethics of Identity: In Search of Ourselves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Lynch, Cecelia. 2014. Interpreting International Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Mälksoo, Maria. 2010. The Politics of Becoming European: A Study of Polish and Baltic Post-Cold War Security Imaginaries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Neumann, Iver B. 2002. “Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy.” Journal of International Studies 31 (3): 627–651.  https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310031201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pin-Fat, Véronique. 2010. Universality, Ethics and International Relations: A Grammatical Reading. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Pouliot, Vincent. 2007. “‘Sobjectivism’: Toward a Constructivist Methodology.” International Relations Quarterly 51 (2): 359–384.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00455.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Prashad, Vijay. 2014. The Poorer Nations: A Possible History of the Global South. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  77. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  78. Rowley, Christina, and Jutta Weldes. 2012. “The Evolution of International Security Studies and the Everyday: Suggestions from the Buffyverse.” Security Dialogue 43 (6): 513–530.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010612463490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, and Dvora Yanow. 2012. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  80. Shapiro, Michael J. 1984. “Introduction.” In Language and Politics, edited by Michael J. Shapiro, 1–12. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Silverman, David. 2013. Doing Qualitative Research. 4th ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Solana, Javier. 2003. “‘The Voice of Europe on Security Matters’: Summary of the Address to the Royal Institute for International Relations.” November 26. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/discours/78071.pdf.
  83. Solana, Javier. 2009. “Europe’s Global Role—What Next Steps? (Ditchley Foundation Lecture).” July 11. London. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/discours/109193.pdf.
  84. Solana, Javier. 2009. “ESDP at 10: What Lessons for the Future?” July 28. Brussels. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/discours/109453.pdf.
  85. Special Issue: Out of the Ivory Tower. 2012. Millenium: Journal of International Studies 40 (3). https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/mil/40/3.
  86. Taylor, Charles. 1993. “To Follow a Rule ….” In Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, edited by Craig Calhoun, Edward LiPuma, and Moishe Postone, 45–60. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  87. Todorov, Tzvetan. 1998. Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogical Principle. Translated by Wlad Godzich. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  88. Torfing, Jacob. 2005. “Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments, and Challenges.” In Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance, edited by David Howarth and Jacob Torfing, 1–32. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  89. Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Viktorova Milne, Jevgenia. 2009. “Returning Culture to Peacebuilding: Contesting the Liberal Peace in Sierra Leone.” PhD diss., University of St Andrews.Google Scholar
  91. Vrasti, Wanda. 2008. “The Strange Case of Ethnography and International Relations.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 37 (2): 279–301.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808097641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wodak, Ruth. 2009. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  93. Yanow, Dvora. 2014. “Methodological Ways of Seeing and Knowing.” In The Routledge Companion to Visual Organisation, edited by Emma Bell, Samantha Warren, and Jonathan E. Schroeder, 167–189. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  94. Zalewski, Marysia, and Cynthia Enloe. 1995. “Questions About Identity in International Relations.” In International Relations Theory Today, edited by Ken Booth and Steve Smith, 279–305. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  95. Zehfuss, Maja. 2002. “The Politics of Reality: Derrida’s Subversions, Constructivism and German Military Involvement Abroad.” In Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality, edited by Maja Zehfuss, 196–249. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Zehfuss, Maja. 2009. “Poststructuralism.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to Ethics and International Relations, edited by Patrick Hayden, 97–111. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Birgit Poopuu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of International PoliticsAberystwyth UniversityAberystwythUK

Personalised recommendations