Advertisement

Survey on Messaging in the Internet

  • Tomas SochorEmail author
  • Nadezda Chalupova
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 986)

Abstract

The prevailing messaging service in the internet has always been the electronic mail. Despite multiple potential competitors have emerged since it started in early 1970’s, e-mail still has the highest share among users. The properties of e-mail and their major competitors are briefly reviewed in order to understand current challenges for e-mail. There are unconfirmed expectations for e-mail to weaken its position primarily among young generations. Therefore, prospects for a future for messaging services (not exclusively e-mail) are presented by results of a small-scale poll among more than 200 messaging users in universities.

Keywords

Electronic mail Messaging service Messaging reliability Spam elimination IRC ICQ Skype SMTP Facebook Messenger Google Hangouts Viber WhatsApp 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The paper was supported by the project Advanced issues in network infrastructure security of the Student Grant Competition of the University of Ostrava.

References

  1. 1.
    Vleck, T.V.: The history of electronic mail. http://www.multicians.org/thvv/mail-history.html. Accessed 07 Aug 2018
  2. 2.
    Klensin, J.: Simple Mail Transfer Protocol. IETF (2008). https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5321.txt. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  3. 3.
    Radicati Group: E-mail statistics Report: 2014–2018. Palo Alto: Radicati Group. http://www.radicati.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/ 01/Email-Statistics-Report-2014-2018-Executive-Summary.pdf (2014). Accessed 15 Sept 2014
  4. 4.
    Radicati Group: Email Market, 2017–2021 – Executive Summary. Palo Alto: Radicati Group (2017). https://www.radicati.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Email-Market-2017-2021-Executive-Summary.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2017
  5. 5.
    Talos Intelligence: Email & Spam data. Talos Intelligence. https://www.talosintelligence.com/reputation_center/email_rep#tab=1. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  6. 6.
    Sheehan, K.B.: E-mail survey response rates: a review. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 6(2), JCMC621 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perez, L.: Millennials hate email (2015). https://medium.com/@lelper/millennials-hate-email-a283e84f4bf7. Accessed 25 Oct 2018
  8. 8.
    Brandon, J.: Why email will be obsolete by 2020. Inc.com (2015). https://www.inc.com/john-brandon/why-email-will-be-obsolete-by-2020.html. Accessed 25 Oct 2018
  9. 9.
    Lafrance, A.: The Triumph of Email. Why does one of the world’s most reviled technologies keep winning? The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/01/what-comes-after-email/422625/. Accessed 25 Oct 2018
  10. 10.
    Sochor, T., Farana, R.: Improving efficiency of e-mail communication via SPAM elimination using blacklisting. In: 2013 21st Telecommunications Forum Telfor, TELFOR 2013 - Proceedings of Papers. School of Electrical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, pp. 924-927 (2013). ISBN 978-147991419-7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Volna, E., Sochor, T., Meli, C., Kominkova–Oplatkova, Z.: Soft computing-based information security. In: Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Cryptology and Information Security. IGI Global, Hershey, USA, pp. 29–60 (2014). ISBN 978-1-4666-5808-0Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Levine, J.: DNS blacklists and whitelists. IETF (2010). http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5782. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  13. 13.
    Sochor, T.: Greylisting method analysis in real SMTP server environment: case-study. In: Innovations and Advances in Computer Sciences and Engineering. Springer, Netherlands, pp. 423-427 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harris, E.: The next step in the spam control war: greylisting (2003). http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  15. 15.
    Lysenko, S., Savenko, O., Bobrovnikova, K., Kryshchuk, A., Savenko, B.: Information technology for botnets detection based on their behaviour in the corporate area network. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 718, 167–181 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oikarinen, J.: IRC History. IRC.org. http://www.irc.org/history_docs/jarkko.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  17. 17.
    Statista.com: Most popular mobile messaging apps worldwide as of July 2018, based on number of monthly active users. https://www.statista.com/statistics/258749/most-popular-global-mobile-messenger-apps/. Accessed 07 Aug 2018
  18. 18.
    Statista.com: Number of monthly active Facebook Messenger users from April 2014 to April 2017. https://www.statista.com/statistics/417295/facebook-messenger-monthly-active-users/. Accessed 07 Aug 2018
  19. 19.
    Curry, E.: Message-oriented middleware. In: Middleware for Communications. Wiley, Blackwell, pp. 1-28 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1002/0470862084.ch1Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Špok, D., Majer, J.: Nedostupní: umění nekomunikovat (Unavailable: the art of noncommunication, in Czech). In: Psychologie.cz: Seriál – Vrtání, Czechia, Prague, 20 September 2018 (2018). https://psychologie.bandcamp.com/track/nedostupn-um-n-nekomunikovat. Accessed 01 Sept 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mendel University in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations