Advertisement

Complexity from the Sciences to Social Systems

  • Alex WilliamsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Political Theory book series (IPoT)

Abstract

What is the legitimate way to apply the findings of complexity theory from the physical sciences in the social domain? This chapter summarises recent philosophy of science on the requirements and features of complex systems in general. It concludes that complex systems must consist of a number of elements in non-linear relationships with one another producing emergent effects in irreversible time. From this starting point, the author proceeds to consider how complexity concepts can be imported into the social sciences, with a number of distinct methodological approaches to doing so considered. Finally it considers how to chart a path between the weaknesses of both scientistic and post-structuralist approaches to complexity thinking within social systems.

Keywords

Social complexity Emergence Cybernetics Post-structuralism Feedback Non-linearity 

References

  1. Barabási, Albert-László, and Réka Albert. 1999. Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science 286: 509–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bedau, Mark. 1997. Weak Emergence. In Philosophical Perspectives: Mind, Causation, and World, ed. J. Tomberlin, vol. 11, 375–399. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Bousquet, Antoine, and Simon Curtis. 2011. Beyond Models and Metaphors. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 24: 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrne, David. 1998. Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: An Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Capra, Fritjof. 1996. The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  6. Chalmers, David. 2006. Strong and Weak Emergence. In The Re-emergence of Emergence, ed. P. Clayton and P. Davies, 244–257. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cilliers, Paul. 1998. Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, Jack, and Ian Stewart. 1994. The Collapse of Chaos: Discovering Simplicity in a Complex World. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  9. Connolly, William E. 2011. A World of Becoming. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Connolly, William. 2013. The “New Materialism” and the Fragility of Things. Millennium—Journal of International Studies 41: 399–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coole, Diana H., and Samantha Frost. 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corning, Peter A. 2002. The Re-emergence of “Emergence”: A Venerable Concept in Search of a Theory. Complexity 7: 18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coveney, Peter, and Roger Highfield. 1995. Frontiers of Complexity: The Search for Order in a Chaotic World. New York: Fawcett Columbine.Google Scholar
  14. Cudworth, Erika, and Steve Hobden. 2011. Posthuman International Relations: Complexity, Ecologism and Global Politics. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  15. Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dorigo, M., and L.M. Gambardella. 1997. Ant Colonies for the Travelling Salesman Problem. Bio Systems 43: 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fahim, Kareem. 2011. Slap to a Man’s Pride Set Off Tumult in Tunisia. The New York Times, sec. Africa.Google Scholar
  18. Fromm, Jochen. 2005. Ten Questions About Emergence. arXiv:nlin/0509049.Google Scholar
  19. Gershenson, Carlos. 2012. Complexity and Information: Measuring Emergence, Self-organization, and Homeostasis at Multiple Scales. Complexity. Early View.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.21424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gladwell, Malcolm. 2000. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  21. Gleick, James. 1987. Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  22. Goldstein, Jeffrey. 1999. Emergence as a Construct: History and Issues. Emergence 1: 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gould, Stephen Jay. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Heylighen, F., and C. Joslyn. 2001. Cybernetics and Second-Order Cybernetics. In Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology, Eighteen-Volume Set, ed. Robert A. Meyers, 3rd ed. Waltham, MA: Academic.Google Scholar
  25. Jervis, Robert. 1997. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Johnson, Neil F. 2010. Simply Complexity: A Clear Guide to Complexity Theory. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Kemp, Stephen. 2009. Unpredictability and Nonlinearity in Complexity Theory: A Critical Appraisal. Emergence 11: 84–93.Google Scholar
  28. Ladyman, James, James Lambert, and Karoline Wiesner. 2013. What Is a Complex System? European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3: 33–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laplace, Pierre Simon. 1951. A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  30. Liebowitz, S.J., and Stephen E. Margolis. 1995. Path Dependence, Lock-In, and History. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11: 205–226.Google Scholar
  31. Miguel, Maxi San, Jeffrey H. Johnson, Janos Kertesz, and Kimmo Kaski. 2012. Challenges in Complex Systems Science. Biomedical Engineering 214 (1): 1–27.Google Scholar
  32. Mirowski, Philip. 2002. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mitchell, Melanie. 2009. Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Morin, Edgar. 2006. Restricted Complexity, General Complexity. ArXiv e-print cs/0610049.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 2008. On Complexity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  36. Prigogine, Ilya, and Isabelle Stengers. 1984. Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Toronto and New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  37. Protevi, John. 2001. Political Physics Deleuze, Derrida, and the Body Politic. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rosenau, James N. 1990. Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sawyer, Robert Keith. 2005. Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simon, Herbert A. 2007. The Architecture of Complexity. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 106: 467–482.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, John, and Chris Jenks. 2006. Qualitative Complexity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sokal, Allan, and Jean Bricmont. 1998. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science. London: Picador.Google Scholar
  43. Strand, Roger. 2007. Complexity, Ideology, and Governance. In Reframing Complexity: Perspectives from North and South, 195–217. Mansifeld, MA: ISCE Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Thompson, Evan, and Francisco J. Varela. 2001. Radical Embodiment: Neural Dynamics and Consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5: 418–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Urry, John. 2003. Global Complexity. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  46. Wiener, Norbert. 1948. Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wild, Walter J. 1980. Euler’s Three-Body Problem. American Journal of Physics 48: 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication StudiesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations