Attitudes toward Kurdish in the City of Ilam in Iran
This study investigated the attitudes of Kurdish native speakers in the city of Ilam toward their mother tongue. The social status and vitality of Kurdish language along with the institutional support provided by the government for this language were investigated. The data collection tools included questionnaire, interview and ethnographic fieldwork. The participants for the questionnaire phase were 360 male and female Kurdish native speakers aged between 18 and 30 and from different educational backgrounds. The participants in the interview were 22 from the survey phase. The results revealed that Kurds in Ilam had a positive attitude toward their language and Kurdish enjoyed a respectable degree of vitality. The results also provided mixed findings for the status of Kurdish and the institutional support it received.
KeywordsAttitude Identity Iran Kurdish Minority language
We would like to thank Mohsen Amini and Dr. Zakarya Bezdoode for offering the Kurdish poem and helping us with its most appropriate translation in English.
- Ahmadi, V., & Bazafkan, M. (2013). The study of reflection of the Kurdish culture and language in Ilam broadcasting programs (Analysis of Ilam cultural elites). Interdisciplinary Studies in Media and Culture, 3(5), 1–27.Google Scholar
- Al-Khatib, M., & Al-Ali, M. (2010). Language and cultural shift among the Kurds of Jordan. Sky Journal of Linguistics, 23(1), 7–36.Google Scholar
- Broermann, M. (2007). Language attitudes among minority youth in Finland and Germany. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 187–188, 129–160.Google Scholar
- Çelik, A. B., & Blum, A. (2007). Track II interventions and the Kurdish question in Turkey: An analysis using a theories of change approach. International Journal of Peace Studies, 12(2), 51–81.Google Scholar
- Christ, H. (1997). Language attitudes and educational policy. In R. Wodak & D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, volume I: Language policy and political issues in education (pp. 1–11). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Derince, M. Ş. (2012). Mother tongue-based multilingual education: How? Eğitim Bilim Toplum, 10(37), 143–151.Google Scholar
- Dornyei, Z. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Giles, H., Bourhis, R. Y., & Taylor, D. W. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In H. Giles. (Ed.), Language ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 307–348). European Monographs in Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Hassanpour, A. (1992). Nationalism and language in Kurdistan, 1918–1985. San Francisco: Mellen Research University Press.Google Scholar
- Mirvahedi, S. H. (2017). Exploring family language policies among Azerbaijani-speaking families in the city of Tabriz, Iran. In J. Macalister & S. H. Mirvahedi (Eds.), Family language policies in a multilingual world: Opportunities, challenges, and consequences (pp. 74–95). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Öpengin, E. (2012). Sociolinguistic situation of Kurdish in Turkey: Sociopolitical factors and language use patterns. The International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 217, 151–180.Google Scholar
- O’Rourke, B. (2005). Attitudes towards minority languages: An investigation of young people’s attitudes towards Irish and Galician (Doctoral dissertation). Dublin City University, Ireland.Google Scholar
- Paul, L. (2008). Kurdish language I. History of the Kurdish language. Encyclopaedia Iranica. Available at http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/kurdish-language-i.
- Rezaei, S. (2017). Researching identity in language and education. In K. A. King, Y.-J. Lai, & S. May (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 10. Research methods in language and education. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Rezaei, S., & Farnia, M. (2016, June 15–18). Language attitude and identity among Armenians in diaspora: A case of Armenians in the city of Isfahan. A paper presented at the Sociolinguistics Symposium 21, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.Google Scholar
- Sheyholislami, J., & Sharifi, A. (2016). “It is the hardest to keep”: Kurdish as a heritage language in the United States. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 237, 75–98.Google Scholar
- Windfuhr, G. (2009). The Iranian languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Yildiz, K., & Fryer, G. (2004). The Kurds: Culture and language rights. London: Kurdish Human Rights Project.Google Scholar