Advertisement

Videogames and Film

  • Jon Robson
  • Aaron Meskin
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores a range of significant similarities and differences between videogames and films. It also examines the relationship between the philosophies of each. We begin by addressing the definition of videogames and the question of whether they count as a subcategory of some other artistic kind, namely, film or the moving image. We then turn to the debate about the art status of videogames and compare this to the debate concerning the art status of films. We go on to explore the nature of interactivity in videogames and ask whether videogame interactivity differs from the kind of interactivity that one can find in other artistic domains (such as interactive film). We conclude by exploring various ethical issues relating to videogames and, again, compare these to related issues which arise with respect to film.

Keywords

Art Art form Detached display Ethics Interactivity Medium Transparency  Videogames 

Bibliography

  1. Abell, Catharine. 2010. Cinema as a Representational Art. The British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (3): 273–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adajian, Thomas. 2003. On the Cluster Account of Art. The British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4): 379–3856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali, Rami. 2015. A New Solution to the Gamer’s Dilemma. Ethics and Information Technology 17 (4): 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, Craig. 1997. Effects of Violent Movies and Trait Hostility on Hostile Feelings and Aggressive Thoughts. Aggressive Behavior 23 (3): 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 2004. An Update on the Effects of Playing Violent Video Games. Journal of Adolescence 27 (1): 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, James, and Jeffrey Dean. 1998. Moderate Autonomism. The British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (2): 150–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arjoranta, Jonne. 2014. Game Definitions: A Wittgensteinian Approach. Game Studies 14 (1). http://gamestudies.org/1401/articles/arjoranta
  8. Arnheim, Rudolf. 1957. Film as Art. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bartel, Christopher. 2012. Resolving the Gamer’s Dilemma. Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1): 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carroll, Noël. 1996a. Theorizing the Moving Image. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1996b. Moderate Moralism. The British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (3): 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 2000. Art and Ethical Criticism: An Overview of Recent Directions of Research. Ethics 110 (2): 350–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 2008. The Philosophy of Motion Pictures. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Cogburn, Jon, and Mark Silcox. 2009. Philosophy through Video Games. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, Jonathan, and Aaron Meskin. 2004. On the Epistemic Value of Photographs. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (2): 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2006. An Objective Counterfactual Theory of Information. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (3): 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dutton, Denis. 2000. But they Don’t Have our Concept of Art. In Theories of Art Today, ed. Noël Carroll, 217–238. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  18. Eaton, Anne W. 2012. Robust Immoralism. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (3): 281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ebert, Roger. 1995. Mr. Payback. Roger Ebert.com, February 17, https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/mr-payback-1995
  20. ———. 2010. Video Games Can Never Be Art. Roger Ebert.com, April 16, http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/video-games-can-never-be-art
  21. Esposito, Nicolas. 2005. A Short and Simple Definition of what a Videogame Is. Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views – Worlds in Play.Google Scholar
  22. Fokt, Simon. 2014. The Cluster Account of Art: A Historical Dilemma. Contemporary Aesthetics 12 (1).Google Scholar
  23. Frasca, Gonzalo. 2003. Ludologists Love Stories, Too: Notes from a Debate that Never Took Place. In Proc. Level Up: Digit. Games Res. Conf.Google Scholar
  24. Frome, Jonathan, and Aaron Smuts. 2004. Helpless Spectators: Generating Suspense in Videogames and Film. TEXT Technology 13: 13–34.Google Scholar
  25. Gaut, Berys. 1998. The Ethical Criticism of Art. In Aesthetics and Ethics, ed. Jerrold Levinson, 182–203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ———. 2005. The Cluster Account of Art Defended. The British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3): 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. 2010. A Philosophy of Cinematic Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones, Jonathan. 2012. Sorry MoMA, Video Games Are Not Art. Guardian, November 30. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2012/nov/30/moma-video-games-art
  29. Karhulahti, Veli-Matti. 2015. Defining the Videogame. Game Studies 15 (2).Google Scholar
  30. Kieran, Matthew. 2003. Forbidden Knowledge: The Challenge of Immoralism. In Art and Morality, ed. José Bermudez and Sebastian Gardner, 56–73. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. King, Geoff, and Tanya Krzywinska eds. 2002. ScreenPlay: Cinema/Videogames/Interfaces. London: Wallflower Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lewis, David. 1980. Veridical Hallucination and Prosthetic Vision. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (3): 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lopes, Dominic McIver. 2010. A Philosophy of Computer Art. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Luck, Morgan. 2009. The Gamer’s Dilemma: An Analysis of the Arguments for the Moral Distinction between Virtual Murder and Virtual Pedophilia. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (1): 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meskin, Aaron. 2007. The Cluster Account of Art Reconsidered. The British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (4): 388–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meskin, Aaron, and Jonathan Cohen. 2008. Photographs as Evidence. In Photography and Philosophy: Essays on the Pencil of Nature, ed. Scott Walden, 70–90. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. Meskin, Aaron, and Jon Robson. 2011. Videogames and the Moving Image. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 254 (4): 547–564.Google Scholar
  38. Moser, Shelby. 2018. Videogame Ontology, Constitutive Rules, and Algorithms. In The Aesthetics of Videogames, ed. J. Robson and G. Tavinor, 42–59. Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moylan, Brian. 2016. The Fan Rituals That Made Rocky Horror Picture Show a Cult Classic. Guardian, October 19. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2016/oct/19/rocky-horror-picture-show-fan-rituals-fox-remake
  40. Patridge, Stephanie. 2013. Pornography, Ethics, and Video Games. Ethics and Information Technology 15 (1): 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. ———. 2017. Video Games and Imaginative Identification. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (2): 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. ———. 2018. Videogames and Gendered Invisibility. In The Aesthetics of Videogames, ed. J. Robson and G. Tavinor, 161–180. Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prinz, Jesse. 2011. When is Film Art? Revue Internationale de Philosophie 254 (4): 473–486.Google Scholar
  44. Robson, Jon. 2018. The Beautiful Gamer? On the Aesthetics of Videogame Performances. In The Aesthetics of Videogames, ed. Jon Robson and Grant Tavinor, 78–94. Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robson, Jon, and Aaron Meskin. 2016. Video Games as Self-Involving Interactive Fictions. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (2): 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. ———. 2017. Still Self-Involved: A Reply to Patridge. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (2): 184–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rough, Brock. 2018. The Incompatibility of Games and Artworks. Journal of the Philosophy of Games 1 (1). https://www.journals.uio.no/index.php/JPG/article/view/2736/5699
  48. Schrier, Karen. 2015. EPIC: A Framework for Using Video Games in Ethics Education. Journal of Moral Education 44 (4): 393–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scruton, Roger. 1981. Photography and Representation. Critical Inquiry 7 (3): 577–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smuts, Aaron. 2003. Film Theory Meets Video Games: An Analysis of the Issues and Methodologies in ScreenPlay. Film-Philosophy 7 (7).Google Scholar
  51. ———. 2005. Are Video Games Art? Contemporary Aesthetics 3.Google Scholar
  52. ———. 2009. What Is Interactivity? The Journal of Aesthetic Education 43 (4): 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. St. John, Laura. 2013. 8 Ways Violent Games Are Bad for Your Kids. HuffPost, September 7, Updated December 6, 2017. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laura-st-john/8-ways-violent-games_b_3875846.html
  54. Suits, Bernard. 1967. What Is a Game? Philosophy of Science 34 (2): 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. ———. 1978/2005. The Grasshopper: Games, Life, and Utopia. Plymouth: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
  56. Tavinor, Grant. 2009a. Bioshock and the Art of Rapture. Philosophy and Literature 33 (1): 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. ———. 2009b. The Art of Videogames. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walton, Kendall. 1970. Categories of Art. The Philosophical Review 79 (3): 334–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. ———. 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Wartenberg, Thomas. 2015. Philosophy of Film. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta.Google Scholar
  61. Webber, Jordan Erica. 2014. Video Games That Let Blind People Play. Guardian, October 13. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/13/video-games-that-let-blind-people-play
  62. Weitz, Moris. 1956. The Role of Theory in Aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 15 (1): 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wells, Jonathan and Francis Blagburn. 2017. Is Video Gaming Bad for You? The Science for and Against. The Telegraph, August 8. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/is-video-gaming-bad-for-you-the-science-for-and-against/
  64. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953/2001. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  65. Yanal, Robert. 2008. Defining the Moving Image: A Response to Noel Carroll. Film and Philosophy 12: 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon Robson
    • 1
  • Aaron Meskin
    • 2
  1. 1.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations