Advertisement

The Phenomenological Movement in Context of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures

  • Shawn Loht
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter surveys foundational concepts in the history of phenomenology for the purpose of highlighting their relevance for key contemporary issues in the philosophy of film. A central argument concerns phenomenology’s capacity for unraveling the ontology of film, given phenomenology’s emphasis on accounting for the ontology of phenomena through description based in first-person experience. On this ground, the chapter defends the claim that film’s ontology stems from the projective intentionality of the film viewer, where the communicative nature of embodied vision also figures into play. The principal phenomenological frameworks taken up are those of Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty, as well as the work of contemporary film scholar Vivian Sobchack.

Keywords

Phenomenology Embodiment Reduction Essences Existentialism World Projection Intentionality 

Bibliography

  1. Andrew, Dudley. 1985. The Neglected Tradition of Phenomenology in Film Theory. In Movies and Methods, ed. Bill Nichols, vol. 2, 625–632. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bazin, Andre. 1967. The Ontology of the Photographic Image. In What Is Cinema? ed. Hugh Gray, vol. 1, 9–16. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bordwell, David. 1996. Contemporary Film Studies and the Vicissitudes of Grand Theory. In Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies, ed. David Bordwell and Noël Carroll, 3–36. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brough, John. 1992. Some Husserlian Comments on Depiction and Art. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly LXVI (2): 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 2010. Showing and Seeing: Film as Phenomenology. In Art and Phenomenology, ed. Joseph Parry, 192–213. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, Noël. 1996. Prospects for Film Theory: A Personal Assessment. In Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies, ed. David Bordwell and Noël Carroll, 37–68. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2008. The Philosophy of Motion Pictures. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Casebier, Allan. 1991. Film and Phenomenology: Toward a Realist Theory of Cinematic Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cavell, Stanley. 1979. The World Viewed. Revised ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chamarette, Jenny. 2012. Phenomenology and the Future of Film. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferencz-Flatz, Christian, and Julian Hanich. 2016. Editor’s Introduction: What Is Film Phenomenology? Studia Phaenomenologica XVI: 11–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heidegger, Martin. 2001. The Thing. In Poetry, Language, Thought, 161–83. Trans. Albert Hofstadter. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2002. The Age of the World-Picture. In Off the Beaten Track, ed. Julian Young and Kenneth Haynes, 57–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2003. The Question Concerning Technology. In Basic Writings, Revised and Expanded, ed. David Farrell Krell, 2nd ed., 307–341. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2010. Being and Time. Trans. Joan Stambaugh. Revised edn. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hopkins, Robert. 2015. The Real Challenge to Photography (as Communicative Representational Art). Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (2): 329–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Husserl, Edmund. 1962. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Trans. Boyce Gibson. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2000. Logical Investigations. Trans. J.N. Findlay. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Books.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2005. Phantasy, Image Consciousness and Memory (1898–1925). Trans. John B. Brough. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Loht, Shawn. 2017. Phenomenology of Film: A Heideggerian Account of the Film Experience. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  21. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964. The Film and the New Psychology. In Sense and Non-Sense, 48–62. Trans. Hubert L. Dreyfus, and Patricia Allen Dreyfus. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1988. The Sensible World and the World of Expression. In In Praise of Philosophy and Other Essays, 71–79. Trans. John Wild, James Edie, and John O’Neill. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2002. Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. Colin Smith. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Mion, Regina-Nino. 2016. Husserl and Cinematographic Depictive Images: The Conflict Between the Actor and Character. Studia Phaenomenologica XVI: 269–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Price, Brian. 2008. Heidegger and Cinema. In European Film Theory, ed. Temenuga Trifonova. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Raviv, Orna. 2016. The Cinematic Point of View: Thinking Film with Merleau-Ponty. Studia Phaenomenologica XVI: 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rozzoni, Claudio. 2016. Cinema Consciousness: Elements of a Husserlian Approach to Film Image. Studia Phaenomenologica XVI: 295–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scruton, Roger. 1981. Photography and Representation. Critical Inquiry 7 (3): 577–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sheehan, Thomas. 2017. Heidegger and the Right Heideggerians: Phenomenology Vs. Crypto-Metaphysics. Kronos VI: 78–90.Google Scholar
  30. Shum, Peter. 2015. The Evolution of Husserl’s Concept of Imagination. Husserl Studies 31: 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sinnerbrink, Robert. 2011. New Philosophies of Film: Thinking Images. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 2016. Cinematic Ethics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Sobchack, Vivian. 1992. The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 2004. Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 2008. Phenomenology. In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film, ed. Paisley Livingston and Carl Plantinga, 435–445. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2016. The Active Eye (Revisited). Studia Phaenomenologica XVI: 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sokolowski, Robert. 2000. Introduction to Phenomenology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2010. Husserl on First Philosophy. In Philosophy, Phenomenology, Sciences: Essays in Commemoration of Edmund Husserl, ed. Carlo Ierna, Hanne Jacobs, and Filip Mattens, 3–30. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sorfa, David. 2014. Phenomenology and Film. In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Film Theory, ed. E. Branigan and W. Buckland, 353–358. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Spiegelberg, Herbert. 1965. The Phenomenological Movement. 2nd ed. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vaughan, Hunter. 2012. Where Film Meets Philosophy: Godard, Resnais, and Experiments in Cinematic Thinking. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Walton, Kendall. 1984. Transparent Pictures: On the Nature of Photographic Realism. Critical Inquiry 11 (2): 246–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wrathall, Mark A. 2013. Heidegger on Human Understanding. In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time, ed. Mark A. Wrathall, 177–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yacavone, Daniel. 2014. Film Worlds: A Philosophical Aesthetics of Cinema. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ———. 2016. Film and the Phenomenology of Art: Reappraising Merleau-Ponty on Cinema as Form, Medium, and Expression. New Literary History 47: 159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zahavi, Dan. 2003. Husserl’s Phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shawn Loht
    • 1
  1. 1.Baton Rouge Community CollegeBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations