Serving a Segregated Metropolitan Area: Disparities in Spatial Access to Primary Care Physicians in Baton Rouge, Louisiana

  • Fahui WangEmail author
  • Michael Vingiello
  • Imam M. Xierali
Part of the Global Perspectives on Health Geography book series (GPHG)


This study examines spatial accessibility of primary care in the Baton Rouge Metropolitan Statistical Area, Louisiana. Two popular accessibility measures are used: the proximity method focuses on the travel time from the nearest facility and the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method considers the match ratio between providers and population as well as the complex spatial interaction between them. The two methods capture different elements of spatial accessibility: one being physically close to a facility and another adding availability of service. Both properties can be valuable for residents. In the study area, residents in urban areas generally enjoy shorter travel time from their nearest service providers as well as higher accessibility scores measured by the 2SFCA method (i.e., physicians per 1000 residents) than rural residents. Overall, disproportionally higher percentages of African Americans are in areas with shorter travel time to the nearest primary care providers and higher accessibility scores; so are residents in areas of higher poverty rates. This “reversed racial advantage” in spatial accessibility does not capture nonspatial obstacles related to financial and other socioeconomic factors for African Americans (and population in poverty) and nevertheless represents one fewer battle to fight in reducing healthcare disparities for various disadvantaged population groups. Such an advantage disappears or is even reversed in remote rural areas with high concentration of African Americans, who suffer from double disadvantages in both spatial and nonspatial access to primary care.


Spatial accessibility Primary care Proximity method 2SFCA Racial disparity Rural–urban disparity Reversed racial advantage 



We are grateful for the supports by the National Institutes of Health (Grant No. R21CA212687, Wang) and the ASPIRE undergraduate research program in the College of Humanities and Social Sciences at Louisiana State University (Vingiello).


  1. American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). Primary care. Available at Accessed 19 Nov 2018.
  2. Bindman, A. B. (2013). Using the national provider identifier for health care workforce evaluation. Medicare & Medicaid Research Review, 3. pii: mmrr.003.03.b03, E1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brabyn, L., & Gower, P. (2003). Mapping accessibility to general practitioners. In O. Khan & R. Skinner (Eds.), Geographic information system and health applications (pp. 289–307). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Delmelle, E. M., et al. (2013). Modeling travel impedance to medical care for children with birth defects using Geographic Information Systems. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 97, 673–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delmelle, E. M., et al. (2018). Travel impedance agreement among online road network data providers. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dony, C. C., Delmelle, E. M., & Delmelle, E. C. (2015). Re-conceptualizing accessibility to parks in multi-modal cities: A variable-width floating catchment area (VFCA) method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 143, 90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. East Baton Rouge Parish. (2016). 2015 Community health needs assessment. Available at Accessed 6-1-2018.
  8. Guo, D. (2008). Regionalization with dynamically constrained agglomerative clustering and partitioning (REDCAP). International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22, 801–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guo, D., & Wang, H. (2011). Automatic region building for spatial analysis. Transactions in GIS, 15(s1), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hart, L. G., Salsberg, E., Phillips, D. M., & Lishner, D. M. (2002). Rural health care providers in the United States. Journal of Rural Health, 18, 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ikram, S. Z., Hu, Y., & Wang, F. (2015). Disparities in spatial accessibility of pharmacies in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Geographical Review, 105, 492–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Joseph, A. E., & Phillips, D. (1984). Accessibility and utilization—Geographical perspectives on healthcare delivery. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  13. Khan, A. A. (1992). An integrated approach to measuring potential spatial access to health care services. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 26(4), 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larson, E., Lin, S. X., & Gomez-Durate, C. (2003). Antibiotic use in Hispanic households, New York City. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 9, 1096–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Law, M., Dijkstra, A., Douillard, J., & Morgan, S. (2011). Geographic accessibility of community pharmacies in Ontario. Healthcare Policy, 6(3), 36–46.Google Scholar
  16. Lee, R. C. (1991). Current approaches to shortage area designation. Journal of Rural Health, 7(4), 437–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee, P. R. (1995). Health system reform and generalist physician. Academic Medicine, 70, S10–S13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luo, W., & Qi, Y. (2009). An enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method for measuring spatial accessibility to primary care physicians. Health and Place, 15, 1100–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luo, W., & Wang, F. (2003). Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: Synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 865–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luo, J., Tian, L., Luo, L., Yi, H., & Wang, F. (2017). Two-step optimization for spatial accessibility improvement: A case study of health care planning in rural China. BioMed Research International, 2017, Article ID 2094654.Google Scholar
  21. Luo, J., Chen, G., Li, C., et al. (2018). Use of an E2SFCA method to measure and analyse spatial accessibility to medical services for elderly people in Wuhan, China. International Journal of Environmental Research in Public Health, 15, 1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mao, L., & Nekorchuk, D. (2013). Measuring spatial accessibility to healthcare for populations with multiple transportation modes. Health & Place, 24, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mu, L., Wang, F., Chen, V. W., & Wu, X. (2015). A place-oriented, mixed-level regionalization method for constructing geographic areas in health data dissemination and analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105, 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Onega, T., Alford-Teaster, J., & Wang, F. (2017). Population-based geographic access to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Center parent and satellite facilities. Cancer, 123, 3305–3311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Penchansky, R., & Thomas, J. W. (1981). The concept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical Care, 19(2), 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shi, X., Xue, B., & Xierali, I. M. (2016). Identifying the uncertainty in physician practice location through spatial analytics and text mining. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(9), 930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. U.S. Bureau of Census. (2018a). TIGER/Line® with selected demographic and economic data. Available at Accessed 6-1-2018.
  28. U.S. Bureau of Census. (2018b). TIGER products. Available at Accessed 6-1-2018.
  29. U.S. Bureau of Census. (2018c). 2010 Census urban and rural classification and urban area criteria. Available at Accessed 6-1-2018.
  30. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (2018). Health professional shortage areas (HPSAs). Available at Accessed 6-1-2018.
  31. Wang, F. (2012). Measurement, optimization, and impact of health care accessibility: A methodological review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(5), 1104–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang, F. (2015). Quantitative methods and socioeconomic applications in GIS. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  33. Wang, F., & Xu, Y. (2011). Estimating O-D travel time matrix by Google Maps API: Implementation, advantages and implications. Annals of GIS, 17, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang, F., McLafferty, S., Escamilla, V., & Luo, L. (2008). Late-stage breast cancer diagnosis and health care access in Illinois. The Professional Geographer, 60, 54–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xierali, I. M. (2018). Physician multisite practicing: Impact on access to care. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 31(2), 260–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xierali, I. M., Nivet, M. A., & Bazemore, A. B. (2016). Modeling physician distribution uncertainty in three common health workforce data. Paper presented at the 12th association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) annual health workforce research conference, Hyatt Regency, Chicago, IL, May 4–May 6.Google Scholar
  37. Xu, Y., Fu, C., Onega, T., Shi, X., & Wang, F. (2017). Disparities in geographic accessibility of National Cancer Institute Cancer centers in the United States. Journal of Medical Systems, 41, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yin, C., He, Q., Liu, Y., et al. (2018). Inequality of public health and its role in spatial accessibility to medical facilities in China. Applied Geography, 92, 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fahui Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael Vingiello
    • 2
  • Imam M. Xierali
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.The Water Institute of the GulfBaton RougeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations