Advertisement

Genealogies of Genetics: Historicising Contemporary Science in Simon Mawer’s Mendel’s Dwarf and A.S. Byatt’s A Whistling Woman

  • Paul Hamann
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine book series (PLSM)

Abstract

Tracing two genealogies of genetics in two contemporary science novels, Hamann identifies the historicising of scientific knowledge and practice as a new trend in the history of the novel. He argues that the foregrounding of scientific historical difference in both Simon Mawer’s Mendel’s Dwarf and A.S. Byatt’s A Whistling Woman reflects the central tenet of twentieth-century philosophy of science that scientific epistemology is historically specific. At the same time, Hamann uncovers the novels’ engagement with past genetic practice as a critique of genetics in the twenty-first century. Exploring the literary forms through which the two novels historicise genetic science, Hamann offers an original perspective on how the aesthetics of the two texts inform and are informed by their investigation of scientific epistemology.

Works Cited

  1. Atwood, Margaret (2003). Oryx and Crake. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  2. ———. (2009). The Year of the Flood. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  3. ———. (2013). MaddAddam. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, Alistair (2007). “Uniting the Two Cultures of Body and Mind in A.S. Byatt’s A Whistling Woman.” Journal of Literature and Science 1: 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butter, Stella (2004). ‘Babbling Voices’: Einheit und Differenz, fremde und eigene Stimme(n) in A.S. Byatts Babel Tower.” Beyond Extremes: Repräsentation und Reflexion von Modernisierungsprozessen im zeitgenössischen britischen Roman. Eds. Stefan Glomb and Stefan Horlacher. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. 351–375.Google Scholar
  6. Byatt, A.S. (1995) [1992]. Angels & Insects. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  7. ———. (1997) [1996]. Babel Tower. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  8. ———. (2003) [2002]. A Whistling Woman. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  9. ———. (2005). “Fiction Informed by Science.” Nature 434: 294–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, Jane (2004). A. S. Byatt and the Heliotropic Imagination. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chamerois, Gilles (2012). “From Bosons to Titans: The Genealogy of Science in Thomas Pynchon’s Mason & Dixon.” Science and American Literature in the 20th and 21st Centuries: From Henry James to John Adams. Ed. Claire Maniez. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars. 31–48.Google Scholar
  12. Clayton, Jay (2003). Charles Dickens in Cyberspace: The Afterlife of the Nineteenth Century in Postmodern Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, Michel (1984). “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.” The Foucault Reader. Ed. Paul Rabinow. Trans. D. F. Bouchard and S. Simon. New York: Pantheon. 76–100.Google Scholar
  14. Haynes, Roslynn D. (2016). “Bringing Science into Fiction.” ZAA 64: 127–148.Google Scholar
  15. Jameson, Fredric (2015). The Antinomies of Realism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, Jennifer Anne (2010). “Soothsaying Song Thrushes and Life-Giving Snails: Motifs in A.S. Byatt’s Babel Tower and A Whistling Woman.” Journal of English Studies 8: 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keller, Evelyn Fox (2001). The Century of the Gene. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kramer, Anne-Marie (2011). “Kinship, Affinity and Connectedness: Exploring the Role of Genealogy in Personal Lives.” Sociology 45: 379–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Latour, Bruno (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  20. Mawer, Simon (2005). “Science in Literature.” Nature 434: 297–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———. (2011) [1997]. Mendel’s Dwarf. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  22. Michie, Helena, and Alexander Regier (2016). “Introduction.” SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900 56: 731–735.Google Scholar
  23. Morange, Michel (1998). A History of Molecular Biology. Trans. Matthew Cobb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Müller-Wille, Staffan, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (2009). Das Gen im Zeitalter der Postgenomik: eine wissenschaftshistorische Bestandaufnahme. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  25. OED Online. (June 2017). -genesis, comb. form. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Web. 4 Oct. 2017.Google Scholar
  26. Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (2010). On Historicizing Epistemology: An Essay. Trans. David Fernbach. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Schaffeld, Norbert (2016a). “Aspects of the Science Novel.” ZAA 64: 121–125.Google Scholar
  28. ———. (2016b). “The Historical Science Novel and the Narrative of an Emergent Scientific Discourse.” ZAA 64: 169–187.Google Scholar
  29. Shiang, Rita, Leslie M. Thompson, Ya-Zhen Zhu et al (1994). “Mutations in the Transmembrane Domain of FGFR3 Cause the Most Common Genetic Form of Dwarfism, Achondroplasia.” Cell 78: 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sturrock, June (2002–2003). “Angels, Insects, and Analogy: A.S. Byatt’s ‘Morpho Eugenia’.” Connotations 12: 93–104.Google Scholar
  31. Voigts, Eckart (2014). “Bio-Fiction: Neo-Victorian Revisions of Evolution and Genetics.” Neo-Victorian Literature and Culture: Immersions and Revisitations. Eds. Nadine Boehm-Schnitker and Susanne Gruss. Abingdon: Routledge. 79–92.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Hamann
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations