Advertisement

Heideggerian Philosophy as an Educational Endeavor

  • Vasco d’Agnese
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, by drawing on Heidegger’s oeuvre, d’Agnese presents what we may refer to as the thorough educational nature of Heideggerian reflection. More specifically, d’Agnese contends that Heideggerian thought is not only anchored by questions and features that are quintessentially pedagogical but also represents a passionate call to freedom, transcending, becoming and the space of the “not-yet”, which education is. Heidegger, throughout his entire career, displays an extraordinary deep and dense reflection on selfhood and subjectivity, a reflection that is rooted in and calls forth a complete transformation of the subject, of her position and gesture towards herself and the world. Such a conception, d’Agnese argues, is in and of itself educational.

References

  1. Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Why ‘What Works’ Still Won’t Work: From Evidence-Based Education to Value-Based Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29, 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biesta, G. J. J. (2011). Philosophy, Exposure and Children: How to Resist the Instrumentalisation of Philosophy in Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(2), 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biesta, G. J. J. (2016). Who’s Afraid of Teaching? Heidegger and the Question of Education (‘Bildung’/‘Erziehung’). Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(8), 832–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and Effort in Education. Boston, New York, and Chicago: Houghton Mifflin Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dewey, J. (1929/1925). Experience and Nature. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  6. Dewey, J. (1930/1916). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Duarte, E. (2016). Heidegger’s Prognostic: Originary Thinking at the End of Philosophy of Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(8), 798–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heidegger, M. (1950/1971). Epilogue. A Letter to a Young Student. In A. Hofstadter (Ed.), Poetry, Language and Thought (pp.181–184). New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  9. Heidegger, M. (1977/1949). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essay. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  10. Heidegger, M. (1982/1927). Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Heidegger, M. (1992/1928). The Metaphysical Foundation of Logic. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Heidegger, M. (1992/1929–1930). The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics. World, Finitude, Solitude. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, M. (1993/1947). Letter on Humanism. In D. F. Krel (Ed.), Martin Heidegger: The Basic Writings (pp. 213–265). San Francisco, CA: Harper.Google Scholar
  14. Heidegger, M. (1996/1927). Being and Time. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  15. Heidegger, M. (2001/1954). Building Dwelling Thinking. In A. Hofstadter (Ed.), Poetry, Language and Thought (pp. 141–161). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  16. Jasinski, I., & Lewis, T. E. (2015). Community of Infancy: Suspending the Sovereignty of the Teacher’s Voice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50(4), 338–353.Google Scholar
  17. Lewis, T. (2014). The Fundamental Ontology of Study. Educational Theory, 64(2), 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Magrini, J. M. (2012). Worlds Apart in the Curriculum: Heidegger, Technology, and the Poietic Attunement of Literature. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 500–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Masschelein, J., & Ricken, N. (2003). Do We (Still) Need the Concept of Bildung? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(2), 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olafson, F. A. (1998). Heidegger and the Ground of Ethics: A Study of Mitsein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reichenbach, R. (2002). On Irritation and Transformation: A-Teleological Bildung and Its Significance for the Democratic Form of Living. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36(3), 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stambaugh, J. (1992). The Finitude of Being. Albany: State of University New York Press.Google Scholar
  23. Standish, P. (1992). Beyond the Self: Wittgenstein, Heidegger and the Limits of Language. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  24. Standish, P. (1997). Heidegger and the Technology of Further Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 31(3), 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thompson, C. (2005). The Non-Transparency of the Self and the Ethical Value of Bildung. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(3), 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thomson, I. (2001). Heidegger on Ontological Education, or: How We Become What We Are. Inquiry, 44, 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thomson, I. (2004). Heidegger’s Perfectionist Philosophy of Education in Being and Time. Continental Philosophy Review, 37, 439–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Todd, S. (2015). Education Incarnate. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(4), 405–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vlieghe, J. (2010). Judith Butler and the Public Dimension of the Body: Education, Critique and Corporeal Vulnerability. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 44(1), 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhao, G. (2014). Freedom Reconsidered: Heteronomy, Open Subjectivity, and the ‘Gift of Teaching’. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 33, 513–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vasco d’Agnese
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Campania Luigi VanvitelliCasertaItaly

Personalised recommendations