Advertisement

Introduction

  • Vasco d’Agnese
Chapter

Abstract

In the chapter, d’Agnese presents the book’s overall framework and its aims and purposes. Dewey and Heidegger, of course, are central. However, d’Agnese’s attempt is not an analysis of Dewey and Heidegger per se. The book responds to the challenge of creating an alternative educational space than that embodied by the neoliberal educational agenda, which, over the last couple of decades, has reframed educational goals and schooling practices worldwide. To accomplish this task, d’Agnese deeply explores both Deweyan and Heideggerian understandings of existence and experience. In both thinkers, d’Agnese argues, the world, living, experience and even one’s conscious thinking always maintain a foundation of mystery and unpredictability. In other words, Dewey and Heidegger reveal an inescapable uncertainty at the core of human thinking and acting. Such an uncertainty, rather than flowing in some nihilistic defeat of educational purposes, puts radical responsibility on the side of the subject, who is simultaneously embedded in and produces educational processes and practices. In this sense, preserving the very unpredictability of students’ connectedness and beyondness is at the core of our educational and philosophical work.

References

  1. Alexander, R. (2011). Evidence, Rhetoric and Collateral Damage: The Problematic Pursuit of ‘World Class’ Standards. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Au, W. (2011). Teaching Under the New Taylorism: High Stakes Testing and the Standardization of the 21st Century Curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Government. (2018). Webpage. Available at https://www.australia.gov.au/information-and-services/education-and-training/qualifications-and-skills-recognition. Accessed August 11, 2018.
  4. Ball, S. J. (2003). The Teacher’s Soul and the Terrors of Performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biesta, G. J. J. (2015). Resisting the Seduction of the Global Education Measurement Industry: Notes on the Social Psychology of PISA. Ethics and Education, 10(3), 348–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. d’Agnese, V. (2017). Reclaiming Education in the Age of PISA. Challenging OECD’s Educational Order. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and Effort in Education. Boston, New York and Chicago: Houghton Mifflin Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dewey, J. (1917). The Need for a Recovery of Philosophy. In J. Dewey, et al. (Eds.), Creative Intelligence: Essays in the Pragmatic Attitude (pp. 3–69). New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  9. Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1929). The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation Between Knowledge and Action. New York: Minton Balch & Company.Google Scholar
  11. Dewey, J. (1929/1925). Experience and Nature. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. (1930/1916). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1980/1934). Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books.Google Scholar
  15. European Commission. (2018). Webpage. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/school/competences_en. Accessed August 11, 2018.
  16. Grek, S. (2009). Governing by Numbers: The PISA ‘Effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heidegger, M. (1982/1927). Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Heidegger, M. (1992/1928). The Metaphysical Foundation of Logic. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Heidegger, M. (1992/1929–1930). The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Heidegger, M. (1996/1927). Being and Time. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  21. Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2008). The Governmentalization of Learning and the Assemblage of Apparatus. Educational Theory, 58(4), 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. OECD. (2018). Webpage. Available at http://www.oecd.org/education/research/. Accessed August 11, 2018.
  23. Shahjahan, R. A. (2011). Decolonizing the Evidence-Based Education and Policy Movement: Revealing the Colonial Vestiges in Educational Policy, Research, and Neoliberal Reform. Journal of Education Policy, 26(2), 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shahjahan, R. A. (2013). Coloniality and a Global Testing Regime in Higher Education: Unpacking the OECD’s AHELO Initiative. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 676–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. U.S. Department of Education. (2018). Webpage. Available at https://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/mission/mission.html. Accessed August 11, 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vasco d’Agnese
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Campania Luigi VanvitelliCasertaItaly

Personalised recommendations