Abstract
Travel patterns of people across Australian cities have been dominated by private cars. As noted by transport researchers, a sustainable transportation system encourages people to make the shift towards non-motorised transport (i.e. public and active transport) and emerging types of transport (i.e. ride-hailing and shared bikes). Using an online questionnaire survey (n = 410), this research reports on the determinants of people’s transition to more sustainable modes of transport in Adelaide, Australia . Further analysis undertaken using a discrete choice model, found that home relocation and job changes were strongly associated with the modal shift of respondents. Younger cohorts were likely to shift away from car usage despite the significant influence in the change in participants’ family composition (i.e. birth of a child), level of education, driving license, dwelling tenure, perceived safety and costs. The significance of this study is that it determined that car dominance can be reduced since there is a willingness of people to opt for non-motorised transport options and other new shared mobility services. The chapter concludes with a varied set of transport policies and strategies addressing different socio-economic groups to increase the share of sustainable mobility , a critical step in moving towards a ‘smarter’ city.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adelaide City Council (2017) City of Adelaide community GHG emissions inventory. Accessed 28 May 2018 from http://dmzweb.adelaidecitycouncil.com/agendasminutes/files08/Attachments/Council_27_March_2018_Item_12.4_Link_1.pdf
Anable J, Lane B, Kelay T (2006) An evidence base review of public attitudes to climate change and transport behaviour. The Department
Anwar AM, Yang J (2017) Examining the effects of transport policy on modal shift from private car to public bus
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2007) Greenhouse gas and energy usage 2010. Canberra
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2011) Employment and unemployment. Accessed 28 May 2018 from http://www.abs.gov.au/Employment-and-Unemployment
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2016) Employment and unemployment. Accessed 28 May 2018 from http://www.abs.gov.au/Employment-and-Unemployment
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2017) 2016 Census QuickStats. Accessed 28 May 2018 from http://quickstats.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/quickstat/036
Bamberg S (2006) Is a residential relocation a good opportunity to change people’s travel behavior? Results from a theory-driven intervention study. Environ Behav 38(6):820–840
Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand (Vol. 9): MIT press
Brand C, Anable J, Tran M (2013) Accelerating the transformation to a low carbon passenger transport system: the role of car purchase taxes, feebates, road taxes and scrappage incentives in the UK. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 49:132–148
Buehler R, Hamre A (2014) National trends in multimodal individual travel behavior in the USA
Cao XJ, Mokhtarian PL, Handy SL (2009) The relationship between the built environment and nonwork travel: a case study of Northern California. Transportation Research Part A: Policy Pract 43(5):548–559
Chatterjee K, Clark B, Bartle C (2016) Commute mode choice dynamics: accounting for day-to-day variability in longer term change. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 16(4):713–734
City of Adelaide (2016) Carbon neutral Adelaide. Accessed 20 Oct 2018 from https://www.cityofadelaide.com.au/city-living/sustainable-adelaide/carbon-neutral-adelaide/
Clark B, Chatterjee K, Melia S (2016) Changes to commute mode: the role of life events, spatial context and environmental attitude. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 89:89–105
Dargay J, Hanly M (2007) Volatility of car ownership, commuting mode and time in the UK. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 41(10):934–948
Diana M (2010) From mode choice to modal diversion: a new behavioural paradigm and an application to the study of the demand for innovative transport services. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77(3):429–441
Diana M, Mokhtarian PL (2009) Desire to change one’s multimodality and its relationship to the use of different transport means. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 12(2):107–119
Fishman E, Washington S, Haworth N (2014) Bike share’s impact on car use: evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 31:13–20
Fuller D, Gauvin L, Kestens Y, Morency P, Drouin L (2013) The potential modal shift and health benefits of implementing a public bicycle share program in Montreal, Canada. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 10(1):66
Goodman A, Sahlqvist S, Ogilvie D, iConnect Consortium (2014) New walking and cycling routes and increased physical activity: one-and 2-year findings from the UK iConnect study. Am J Public Health 104(9):e38–e46
Graham-Rowe E, Skippon S, Gardner B, Abraham C (2011) Can we reduce car use and if so, how? A review of available evidence. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 45(5):401–418
Heinen E, Panter J, Mackett R, Ogilvie D (2015) Changes in mode of travel to work: a natural experimental study of new transport infrastructure. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 12(1):81
Heinen E, Harshfield A, Panter J, Mackett R, Ogilvie D (2017) Does exposure to new transport infrastructure result in modal shifts? Patterns of change in commute mode choices in a four-year quasi-experimental cohort study. J Transp Health 6:396–410
Hensher DA (2008) Climate change, enhanced greenhouse gas emissions and passenger transport–What can we do to make a difference? Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 13(2):95–111
Idris AO, Habib KMN, Shalaby A (2015) An investigation on the performances of mode shift models in transit ridership forecasting. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 78:551–565
Klinger T, Lanzendorf M (2016) Moving between mobility cultures: what affects the travel behavior of new residents? Transportation 43(2):243–271
Kroesen M (2014) Modeling the behavioral determinants of travel behavior: an application of latent transition analysis. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 65:56–67
Lanzendorf M (2010) Key events and their effect on mobility biographies: the case of childbirth. Int J Sustain Transp 4(5):272–292
Loader C (2018) Suburban employment clusters and the journey to work in Australian cities. Charting transport. Accessed 20 Oct 2018 from https://chartingtransport.com/2018/07/08/suburban-employment-clusters-and-the-journey-to-work-in-australian-cities/
Martin EW, Shaheen SA (2014) Evaluating public transit modal shift dynamics in response to bikesharing: a tale of two US cities. J Transp Geogr 41:315–324
Nguyen HA, Allan A (2017) The extension of Adelaide’s tram line to the City’s East End and its implications for building a sustainable urban transport system in Adelaide’s CBD. In: International conference on computers in urban planning and urban management, Adelaide, Australia
Oakil A, Ettema D, Arentze T, Timmermans H (2011) A longitudinal analysis of the dependence of the commute mode switching decision on mobility decisions and life cycle events. Paper presented at the Transportdynamics: Proceedings of 16th international conference of Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies (HKSTS). Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies, Hong Kong
Panter J, Griffin S, Dalton AM, Ogilvie D (2013) Patterns and predictors of changes in active commuting over 12 months. Prev Med 57(6):776–784
Perone JS, Volinski JM (2003) Fare, free, or something in between?
Pradono P, Kusumantoro IP, Retapradana A (2015) Towards carbon dioxide emission reduction through public transport revitalization: case of proposed surabaya tram transit project. J Eastern Asia Soc Transp Stud 11:967–978
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC (1986) Toward a comprehensive model of change. Treating addictive behaviors. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3–27
Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Rossi JS, Goldstein MG, Marcus BH, Rakowski W, Rosenbloom D (1994) Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychol 13(1):39
Rabl A, De Nazelle A (2012) Benefits of shift from car to active transport. Transp Policy 19(1):121–131
Rafat R, Mirhadi S, Sharifi E, Soltani A (2018) The evaluation of urban development project by approach of landscape urbanism tenets: the case study of Bowden, Adelaide. Paper presented at the State Of Australian Cities, Adelaide, Australia
Ramadurai G, Srinivasan K (2006) Dynamics and variability in within-day mode choice decisions: role of state dependence, habit persistence, and unobserved heterogeneity. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1977(1):43–52
Redman L, Friman M, Gärling T, Hartig T (2013) Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: a research review. Transp Policy 25:119–127
Santos G, Behrendt H, Teytelboym A (2010) Part II: policy instruments for sustainable road transport. Res Transp Econ 28(1):46–91
Scheepers C, Wendel-Vos G, Den Broeder J, Van Kempen E, Van Wesemael P, Schuit A (2014) Shifting from car to active transport: a systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 70:264–280
Shaheen S, Martin E (2015) Unraveling the modal impacts of bikesharing. Access 47:8–15
Shaheen S, Martin E, Cohen A (2013) Public bikesharing and modal shift behavior: a comparative study of early bikesharing systems in North America. Int J Transp 1(1):35–54
Shirzadi Babakan A, Alimohammadi A, Taleai M (2015) An agent-based evaluation of impacts of transport developments on the modal shift in Tehran, Iran. J Dev Effectiveness 7(2):230–251
Song Y, Preston J, Ogilvie D, Consortium. I (2017) New walking and cycling infrastructure and modal shift in the UK: a quasi-experimental panel study. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 95:320–333
Steinbach R, Green J, Datta J, Edwards P (2011) Cycling and the city: a case study of how gendered, ethnic and class identities can shape healthy transport choices. Soc Sci Med 72(7):1123–1130
Termida NA, Susilo YO, Franklin JP (2016) Observing dynamic behavioural responses due to the extension of a tram line by using panel survey. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 86:78–95
Thornton LK, Pearce JR, Kavanagh AM (2011) Using geographic information systems (GIS) to assess the role of the built environment in influencing obesity: a glossary. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 8(71):1–9. http://HDR.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30044447
Train KE (2009a) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Train KE (2009b) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Transport for London (TfL) (2010) Modal shift triggers in Richmond. Accessed 28 May 2018 from http://content.tfl.gov.uk/modal-shift-triggers-in-richmond-presentation.pdf (TfL 2010)
Van Dender K, Clever M (2013) Recent trends in car usage in advanced economies: slower growth ahead?; summary and conclusions
Yang J, Shen Q, Shen J, He C (2012) Transport impacts of clustered development in Beijing: compact development versus overconcentration. Urban Stud 49(6):1315–1331
Acknowledgements
The survey for this research was funded by CRC Low Carbon Living research node and received the ethics approval from the Research Department of the University of South Australia (Ethics protocol: Major Trip Generators Survey, ID #200525). The authors acknowledge the support from CRC for Low Carbon Living.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix 1: UniSA Travel Behaviours Questionnaire
Appendix 1: UniSA Travel Behaviours Questionnaire
1.1 Section A: Attitudes to Mobility Options
-
A1
[ASK ALL] How important are environmental issues (for instance, CO2 emissions) for you when it comes to selecting a mode of transport within Adelaide CBD area? SR
Code | Response | Routing |
---|---|---|
1 | Very important | Continue |
2 | Important | |
3 | Moderately important | |
4 | Slightly important | |
5 | Not important |
-
A2
[ASK ALL] How do you rate the following criteria when choosing a transport mode? (Please rate on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 = not at all important and 5 = very important).
Code | Response | (1) Not important | (2) Slightly important | (3) Moderately important | (4) important | (5) Very important | Routing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Comfort | Continue | |||||
2 | Convenience and/or practicality | ||||||
3 | Safety and/or personal security | ||||||
4 | Cost savings | ||||||
5 | Speed | ||||||
6 | Time savings | ||||||
7 | Health | ||||||
8 | Exercise | ||||||
9 | Travel distance | ||||||
10 | Independence | ||||||
11 | Status/image |
The following questions are asked for those who indicated code 1,11,12 at A2vi. For respondents who did not use a car to get the destination skip to A7.
-
A3
[ASK IF CODE 1,11,12 AT A2vi] Thinking about your most recent trip to ____________ [USE CODE AT A2] that you made by CAR, what are the main reasons you used your car to get to/from this destination (choose up to 3)? MR
Code | Response | Routing |
---|---|---|
1 | Saving in time | Continue |
2 | Convenience and/or comfort | |
3 | Flexibility and/or Reliability | |
4 | Safety and/or Personal security | |
5 | Easy to find a park | |
6 | Habit | |
7 | Health /physical condition | |
8 | Independence/status | |
9 | Children and/or family issue | |
10 | Lack of alternative | |
11 | Don’t like other modes e.g. public transport /walking/cycling | |
12 | Other (please specify) |
-
A4
[ASK IF CODE 1,11,12 AT A2vi] And still thinking about your most recent trip to _______________ [USE CODE AT A2], where did you park your CAR at that time ?
Code | Response | Routing |
---|---|---|
1 | Private parking area | Continue |
2 | Off-street public parking area | |
3 | On-street public parking area | |
4 | Public parking garage (car parking structure) | |
5 | Other (please specify) |
-
A5
[ASK IF CODE 1,11,12 AT A2vi] And how did you get from your CAR PARK to your final destination for that most recent trip?
Code | Response | Routing |
---|---|---|
1 | Walked | Continue |
2 | Used public transit | |
3 | Taxi/Uber | |
4 | Cycled | |
5 | None, I parked at the destination itself |
-
A6
[ASK IF CODE 1,11,12 AT A2vi] And on a scale of 1–10 where 1 is very unlikely and 10 is very likely how likely would you be to use any of the following options to access this location in the future rather than taking a personal car?
Code | Type | 1 = Very unlikely | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 = Very likely | Routing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Shared bike (OfO) | Continue | |||||
2 | Shared bike (O’Bike) | ||||||
3 | Shared bike (Adelaide CityBike) | ||||||
4 | Your own bike | ||||||
5 | UBER | ||||||
6 | GoGet sharing car | ||||||
7 | Driverless autonomous car | ||||||
8 | Free City bus | ||||||
9 | Free tram | ||||||
10 | Other (please specify) |
-
A7
[ASK ALL] Have you changed the primary mode of transport by which you travel to work in the last two years at all? SR
Code | Response | Routing |
---|---|---|
1 | Yes | Continue |
2 | No | Skip to B11 |
3 | Unsure | Skip to B11 |
-
A8
[Ask if YES at A7] What was the main reason for changing your mode of transport? SR
Code | Response | Routing |
---|---|---|
1 | Relocation of job | Continue |
2 | Relocation of home | Continue |
3 | Other (please specify) | Continue |
1.2 Section B: Personal and Household Information
-
B1
What is your gender SR
Code | Response | Routing |
---|---|---|
1 | Male | Continue |
2 | Female | |
3 | Prefer not to say |
-
B2
What category of age are you in? SR
Code | Response | Routing |
---|---|---|
1 | 17–19 | Continue |
2 | 20–24 | |
3 | 25–29 | |
4 | 30–34 | |
5 | 35–39 | |
6 | 40–44 | |
7 | 45–49 | |
8 | 50–54 | |
9 | 55–59 | |
10 | 60–64 | |
11 | 65–69 | |
12 | 70–74 | |
13 | 75–79 | |
14 | 80–84 | |
15 | 85 and over | |
16 | Prefer not to say |
-
B3
What is your employment status? SR
Code | Response | Routing |
---|---|---|
1 | Working full time (35 + hours per week) | Continue |
2 | Working part time (less than 35 h per week) | |
3 | Casual worker | |
4 | Working from home | |
5 | Not working (e.g., stay at home parent) | |
6 | Seeking for job | |
7 | Student (and not working) | |
8 | Retired | |
9 | Other (please specify) |
-
B4
What is your highest level of education? SR
Code | Response | Routing |
---|---|---|
1 | None | Continue |
2 | Primary School level | |
3 | High School Certificate | |
4 | Undergraduate University degree | |
5 | Postgraduate University degree | |
6 | Other (please specify) ……. |
-
B5
What is your residency status? SR
Code | Response | Routing |
---|---|---|
1 | Australian born | Continue |
2 | Australian resident or citizen (born overseas) | |
3 | Short term non-Australian resident (on a student visa) | |
4 | Visiting (tourist) | |
5 | Other (please specify) |
-
B6
How would you describe your home? SR
Code | Response | Routing |
---|---|---|
1 | Separate house | Continue |
2 | Semi-detached, row or terrace house, townhouse etc. | |
3 | Flat or apartment | |
4 | Other (please specify) |
-
B7
Which of the following categories best describes your weekly personal pre-tax income ? SR
Code | Response | Routing |
---|---|---|
1 | Nil income | Continue |
2 | $1–$199 | |
3 | $200–$299 | |
4 | $300–$399 | |
5 | $400–$599 | |
6 | $600–$799 | |
7 | $800–$999 | |
8 | $1000–$1249 | |
9 | $1250–$1499 | |
10 | $1500–$1999 | |
11 | $2000 or more |
-
B8
What is the size of your household ? SR
Code | Response | Routing |
---|---|---|
1 | 1, just me | Continue |
2 | 2 | |
3 | 3 | |
4 | 4 | |
5 | 5 or more |
-
B9
How many registered cars are available at your household ? SR
Code | Response | Routing |
---|---|---|
1 | 0 | Continue |
2 | 1 | |
3 | 2 | |
4 | 3 | |
5 | 4 or more |
-
B10
Do you use a smartphone or tablet (e.g., an iPad) for transport purpose (public transit application; bike share application, check up on a bus/tram/train timetable or route map)? SR
Code | Response | Routing |
---|---|---|
1 | Yes | Continue |
2 | No | |
3 | Unsure |
-
B11
What is the name of the suburb and Street where you live? OE
Suburb __________________________________________________
Street ________________________________________________
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Soltani, A., Allan, A., Nguyen, H.A. (2019). Developing a Behavioural Model for Modal Shift in Commuting. In: Geertman, S., Zhan, Q., Allan, A., Pettit, C. (eds) Computational Urban Planning and Management for Smart Cities. CUPUM 2019. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19424-6_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19424-6_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19423-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19424-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)