Advertisement

The Soil as a Water Reservoir for Plants

  • Klaus Reichardt
  • Luís Carlos Timm
Chapter

Abstract

Soil is the central part of Soil–Plant–Atmosphere System (SPAS), being the second subsystem of the SPAS described in this book. The soil is characterized by its three components, the solid particles that are the main structural body, the soil water described as a solution of plant nutrients, and the soil air that is essential in the gas transfer between the upper atmosphere and the soil pores. Soil particles are presented in terms of their quantity leading to the concepts of soil texture and soil structure. The main characteristics of the particles are described in view to understand the physical and chemical processes that occur while studying the dynamics in the SPAS. The liquid fraction is mainly studied focusing on soil water, essential for crop growth and development and for agricultural management. Basic concepts of soil water are defined for the studies of the water cycle in the SPAS and for soil management including irrigation. Soil air is also quantified through its porosity, which can be occupied by water and air. Finally, a few words are also said about soil mechanics and soil classification.

References

  1. Ajayi AE, Dias Junior MS, Curi N, Araújo Junior CF, Aladenola OO, Souza TTT, Inda Júnior AV (2009a) Comparison of estimation methods of soil strength in five soils. Braz J Soil Sci 33:487–495Google Scholar
  2. Ajayi AE, Dias Junior MS, Curi N, Araújo Junior CF, Aladenola OO, Souza TTT, Inda Júnior AV (2009b) Strength attributes and compaction susceptibility of Brazilian Latosols. Soil Tillage Res 105:122–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajayi AE, Dias Junior MS, Curi N, Gontijo I, Araújo Junior CF, Vasconcelos Júnior AI (2009c) Relation of strength and mineralogical attributes in Brazilian latosols. Soil Tillage Res 102:14–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball BC, Batey T, Munkholm LJ (2007) Field assessment of soil structural quality – a development of the Peerlkamp test. Soil Use Manag 23:329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) (2002) Methods of soil analysis, Part 4, Physical methods. Soil Science Society of America, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  6. Decico A (1967) Condutividade térmica dos solos: equações para o cálculo da condutividade térmica de alguns solos em função da densidade e umidade. PhD Thesis, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz/Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo state, Brazil.Google Scholar
  7. Dias Junior MS (2003) A soil mechanics approach to study soil compaction. In: Achyuthan H (ed) Soil and soil physics in continental environment. Allied Publishers Private Limited, Chennai, pp 179–199Google Scholar
  8. Dias Junior MS, Leite FP, Lasmar Júnior E, Araújo Junior CF (2005) Traffic effects on the soil preconsolidation pressure due to eucalyptus harvest operations. Sci Agr 62:248–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dias Junior MS, Fonseca S, Araújo Junior CF, Silva AR (2007) Soil compaction due to forest harvest operations. Pesq Agr Bras 42:257–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dourado-Neto D, Powlson D, Bakar RA et al (2010) Multiseason recoveries of organic and inorganic nitrogen-15 in tropical cropping systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erickson AE, Van Doren DM (1960) The relation of plant growth and yield to oxygen availability. Trans Int Congr Soil Sci 3:428–434Google Scholar
  12. Freire JC, Ribeiro MAV, Bahia VG, Lopes AS, Aquino LH (1980) Maize production under greenhouse conditions as a function of water levels in soils from the Lavras region (Minas Gerais State). Braz J Soil Sci 4:5–8Google Scholar
  13. Fried M, Shapiro RE (1961) Soil-plant relationships and ion uptake. Annu Rev Plant Phys 12:91–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garbout A, Munkholm LJ, Hansen SB (2013) Tillage effects on topsoil structural quality assessed using X-ray CT, soil cores and visual soil evaluation. Soil Tillage Res 128:104–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grable AR, Siemer EG (1968) Effects of bulk density, aggregate size, and soil water suction on oxygen diffusion, redox potential and elongation of corns roots. Soil Sci Soc Am J 32:180–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guimarães RML, Ball BC, Tormena CA, Giarola NFB, Silva AP (2013) Relating visual evaluation of soil structure to other physical properties in soils of contrasting texture and management. Soil Tillage Res 127:92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hakansson I, Lipiec J (2000) A review of the usefulness of relative bulk density values in studies of soil structure and compaction. Soil Tillage Res 53:71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hawkins JC (1962) The effects of cultivation on aeration, drainage and other factors important in plant growth. J Sci Food Agric 13:386–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jury WA, Horton R (2004) Soil physics, 6th edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  20. Kachanoski RG, De Jong E (1988) Scale dependence and temporal persistence of spatial patterns of soil water storage. Water Resour Res 24:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kersten SM (1949) Thermal properties of soil. University of Minnesota (Institute of Technology), MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  22. Kiehl EJ (1979) Manual de edafologia: relações solo-planta. Agronômica Ceres, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  23. Kutilek M, Nielsen DR (1994) Soil hydrology. Catena, Cremlingen-DestedtGoogle Scholar
  24. Lima CLR, Miola ECC, Timm LC, Pauletto EA, Silva AP (2012) Soil compressibility and least limiting water range of a constructed soil under cover crops after coal mining in Southern Brazil. Soil Tillage Res 124:190–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Malavolta E (1976) Manual de química agrícola: nutrição de plantas e fertilidade do solo. Agronômica Ceres, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  26. Moncada MP, Penning LH, Timm LC, Gabriels D, Cornelis WM (2014) Visual examinations and soil physical and hydraulic properties for assessing soil structural quality of soils with contrasting textures and land uses. Soil Tillage Res 140:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mueller L, Kay BD, Hu C, Li Y, Schindler U, Behrendt A, Shepherd TG, Ball BC (2009) Visual assessment of soil structure: evaluation of methodologies on sites in Canada, China and Germany: Part I: Comparing visual methods and linking them with soil physical data and grain yield of cereals. Soil Tillage Res 103:178–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oliveira JCM, Vaz CMP, Reichardt K, Swartzendruber D (1997) Improved soil particle-size analysis by gamma-ray attenuation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:23–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prevedello CL, Armindo RA (2015) Física do Solo com problemas resolvidos. Sociedade Autônoma de Estudos Avançados em Física do Solo, CuritibaGoogle Scholar
  30. Reichardt K (1987) A água em sistemas agrícolas. Manole, BarueriGoogle Scholar
  31. Reichardt K, Salati E, Freire O, Cruciani DE (1965) Propriedades térmicas de alguns solos do Estado de São Paulo. In: Congresso Latino Americano, Congresso Brasileiro de Ciência do Solo. Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, PiracicabaGoogle Scholar
  32. Reichardt K, Libardi PL, Moraes SO, Bacchi OOS, Turatti AL, Villagra MM (1990) Soil spatial variability and its implications on the establishment of water balances. Trans Int Congr Soil Sci Kyoto Japan 1:41–46Google Scholar
  33. Reisenauer HM (1966) Mineral nutrients in soil solution. In: Alman PL, Dittmer DS (eds) Environmental biology. Fed Am Soc Exp Biology, Bethesda, pp 507–508Google Scholar
  34. Rocha MG, Faria LN, Casaroli D, van Lier QJ (2010) Evaluation of a root-soil water extraction model by root systems divided over soil layers with distinct hydraulic properties. Braz J Soil Sci 34:1017–1028Google Scholar
  35. Shepherd TG (2009) Visual soil assessment, Pastoral grazing and cropping on flat to rolling country, vol 1, 2nd edn. Horizons Regional Council, Palmerston North, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  36. Silva AP, Kay BD, Perfect E (1994) Characterization of the least limiting water range. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1775–1781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Silva AL, Roveratti R, Reichardt K, Bacchi OOS, Timm LC, Bruno IP, Oliveira JCM, Dourado-Neto D (2006) Variability of water balance components in a coffee crop grown in Brazil. Sci Agric 63:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Silva AL, Bruno IP, Reichardt K, Bacchi OOS, Dourado-Neto D, Favarin JL, Costa FMP, Timm LC (2009) Soil water extraction by roots and Kc for the coffee crop. Agriambi 13:257–261Google Scholar
  39. Soil Survey Staff (1951) Soil texture. In: Soil Survey Staff (ed) Soil survey manual, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp. 205–213.Google Scholar
  40. Stokes GG (1851) On the effect of the lateral friction of fluids on the motion of pendulums. Trans Cambr Philos Soc 9:8–106Google Scholar
  41. Stolf R, Thurler AM, Bacchi OOS, Reichardt K (2011) Method to estimate soil macroporosity and microporosity based on sand content and bulk density. Braz J Soil Sci 35:447–459Google Scholar
  42. Stolf R, Murakami JH, Maniero MA, Silva LCF, Soares MR (2012) Integration of ruler to measure depth in the design of a Stolf impact penetrometer. Braz J Soil Sci 5:1476–1482Google Scholar
  43. Taylor HM, Roberson GM, Parker Junior JJ (1966) Soil strength–root penetration relations to medium to coarse-textured soil materials. Soil Sci 102:18–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Turatti AL, Reichardt K (1991) Soil water storage variability in “Terra Roxa Estruturada”. Braz J Soil Sci 13:253–257Google Scholar
  45. Van Bavel CHM (1965) Composition of soil atmosphere. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 315–318Google Scholar
  46. Vaz CMP, Oliveira JCM, Reichardt K, Crestana S, Cruvinel PE, Bacchi OOS (1992) Soil mechanical analysis through gamma-ray attenuation. Soil Technol 5:319–325Google Scholar
  47. Webster R, Lark M (2013) Field sampling for environmental science and management. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Reichardt
    • 1
  • Luís Carlos Timm
    • 2
  1. 1.Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura and Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiróz”University of Sao PauloPiracicabaBrazil
  2. 2.Rural Engineering Department, Faculty of AgronomyFederal University of PelotasCapão do LeãoBrazil

Personalised recommendations