Advertisement

Comparative Conclusions

  • Allen Zagoren
  • Lucy Bregman
  • Mary Gottschalk
  • Timothy D KnepperEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Comparative Philosophy of Religion book series (COPR, volume 2)

Abstract

This essay is in fact a set of four mini-essays, each of which was delivered at the final event of The Comparison Project’s 2015–2017 series by one of its organizers. Allen Zagoren’s conclusion offers us the perspective of a practicing surgeon on the medicalization of death, wrestling with the physician’s instinct to save life at all costs, while understanding that this instinct often comes into conflict with what is best for a person and a society. Lucy Bregman’s conclusion instead focuses attention on the range of relationships between religious traditions and modern Western medicalized views of death, eventually maintaining that it is not biomedical advances per se that are at issue but rather the role of doctor as medical researcher. Mary Gottschalk’s “layperson’s” conclusion explores answers to three key questions that emerged over the course of the 2015–2017 programming cycle: (1) Does the fact that we have the medical means to cure disease or prolong life mean that we should do it? (2) What are the guidelines for determining what should be done and when? (3) Who should make this decision and how? Timothy D Knepper’s comparative conclusion then ends the essay and volume by attempting to explain the striking similarities between the bioethical positions of different religions by drawing on the cognitive scientific approach of Pascal Boyer.

References

  1. Alemayehu, Berhanu, and Kenneth E. Warner. 2004. The lifetime distribution of health care costs. Health Services Research 39 (3): 627–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyer, Pascal. 2001. Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bozongwana, W. 1983. Ndebele religions and customs. Gweru: Mambo Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chapple, Christopher K. 2006. Dying and death: Jaina dharma traditions. In Dying, death, and afterlife in dharma traditions and western religions, ed. Adarsh Deepak and Rita DasGupta Sherma, 45–56. Hampton: Deepak Heritage Books.Google Scholar
  5. Cox, Gerry R. 2002. North American native care of the dying and the grieving. In Death and bereavement around the world, ed. John D. Morgan and Pittu Laungani, vol. 1, 159–182. Amityville: Baywood Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  6. Dorff, Elliot N. 2003. Matters of life and death: A Jewish approach to modern medical ethics. Philadelphia: Jewish Publications Society.Google Scholar
  7. Gordon, Michael. 2015. Rituals in death and dying: Modern medical technologies enter the fray. Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal 6 (1): e0007.  https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grayling, A.C. 2013. The God argument: The case against religion and for humanism. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  9. Kelly, David F., Gerard Magill, and Henk Ten Have. 2013. Contemporary Catholic health care ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Keown, Damien. 2001. Buddhism and bioethics. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  11. Kushner, Harold. 1981. When bad things happen to good people. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. Matalane, Lissah J.T. 1989. The experiences of death and dying of Zulu patients, their families and caregivers. Diss. University of Natal.Google Scholar
  13. Messerly, John G. n.d. A glorious future. Reason and meaning: Philosophical reflections on life, death, and the meaning of life. https://reasonandmeaning.com/2013/12/21/twenty-first-century-technology/. Accessed 16 Aug 2018.
  14. Nuland, Sherwin B. 1995. How we die: Reflections of life’s final chapter. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  15. Padela, Aasim. 2013. Islamic bioethics: Between sacred law, lived experiences, and state authority. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (2): 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Padela, Aasim, and Omar Qureshi. 2016. Islamic perspectives on clinical intervention near the end-of-life: We can but must we? Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9729-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Quill, Timothy and Bernard Sussman. n.d. Physician assisted death. The Hastings Center. https://www.thehastingscenter.org/briefingbook/physician-assisted-death/. Accessed 14 Aug 2018.
  18. Tsomo, Karma Lekshe. 2006. Into the jaws of Yama, lord of death: Buddhism, bioethics, and death. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  19. Tukol, T.K. 1976. Sallekhana is not suicide. Ahmedabad: L.D: Institute of Indology.Google Scholar
  20. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). 2009. Ethical & religious directives for Catholic health care services. 5th ed. Washington, DC: USCCB.Google Scholar
  21. Vance, Ashlee. 2014. Silicon Valley investor backs $1 million prize to end death. Bloomsberg Businessweek. http://paloaltoprize.com/media-old/. Accessed 14 Aug 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allen Zagoren
    • 1
  • Lucy Bregman
    • 2
  • Mary Gottschalk
    • 1
  • Timothy D Knepper
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Drake UniversityDes MoinesUSA
  2. 2.Religion DepartmentTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations