Advertisement

Introduction

  • Pertti AlasuutariEmail author
  • Ali Qadir
Chapter

Abstract

In the months leading up to the invasion of Normandy, a turning point in World War II, the Allies conducted a substantial military deception. In the carefully planned Operation Bodyguard, the Allied forces deceived the Germans into thinking Normandy is a diversion and that the Pas de Calais is the main invasion target. To create this illusion, a fictitious First US Army Group was invented, supposedly located in Kent and Sussex.

References

  1. Alasuutari, P. (2011). The Governmentality of Consultancy and Competition: The Influence of the OECD. In G. Solinís & N. Baya-Laffite (Eds.), Mapping Out the Research-Policy Matrix: Highlights from the First International Forum on the Social Science-Policy Nexus (pp. 147–165). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Alasuutari, P. (2018). Authority as Epistemic Capital. Journal of Political Power, 11(2), 165–190.  https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2018.1468151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avant, D. D., Finnemore, M., & Sell, S. K. (Eds.). (2010). Who Governs the Globe? Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barbier, M. (2007). D-day Deception: Operation Fortitude and the Normandy Invasion. Westport: Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
  5. Beckfield, J. (2008). The Dual World Polity: Fragmentation and Integration in the Network of Intergovernmental Organizations. Social Problems, 55(3), 419–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, C. (1997). Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. (Eds.). (1999). Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, R. H. (1989). A Poetic for Sociology: Toward a Logic of Discovery for the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Buduru, B., & Pal, L. A. (2010). The Globalized State: Measuring and Monitoring Governance. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(4), 511–530.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549410377144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Castells, M. (2011). A Network Theory of Power. International Journal of Communication, 5, 773–787.Google Scholar
  13. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ciurria, M., & Altamimi, K. (2014). Argumentum Ad Verecundiam: New Gender-Based Criteria for Appeals to Authority. Argumentation, 28(4), 437–452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9328-0.
  15. Congressional-Executive Commission on China. (2010). 2010 Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.cecc.gov/publications/annual-reports/2010-annual-report.
  16. Dean, M. (1998). Administering Asceticism: Reworking the Ethical Life of the Unemployed Citizen. In M. Dean & B. Hindess (Eds.), Governing Australia: Studies in Contemporary Rationalities of Government (pp. 87–107). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Dean, M. (2002). Powers of Life and Death Beyond Governmentality. Cultural Values, 6(1–2), 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dean, M., & Hindess, B. (1998). Governing Australia: Studies in Contemporary Rationalities of Government. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance, 13(1), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunlop, C. (2009). Policy Transfer as Learning: Capturing Variation in What Decision-Makers Learn from Epistemic Communities. Policy Studies, 30, 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Durkheim, É. (1995). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (Repr. ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. Edmondson, R. (1984). Rhetoric in Sociology. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elson, P. R. (2015). A Comparative Analysis of Nonprofit Policy Network Governance in Canada. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit & Social Economy Research / Revue canadienne de recherche sur les OSBL et l’economie sociale, 6(2), 42–64.Google Scholar
  26. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fiss, P. C., & Hirsch, P. M. (2005). The Discourse of Globalization: Framing and Sensemaking of an Emerging Concept. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foucault, M. (1970). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  29. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  30. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Foucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977–78. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Glaeser, A. (2011). Political Epistemics: The Secret Police, the Opposition, and the End of East German Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of the Experience. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
  35. Haas, P. M. (1992a). Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic Community Efforts to Protect Stratospheric Ozone. International Organization, 46(1), 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haas, P. M. (1992b). Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hajer, M. A. (2009). Authoritative Governance: Policy-Making in the Age of Mediatization. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hajer, M. A., & Versteeg, W. (2005). Performing Governance Through Networks. European Political Science, 4(3), 340–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heinrich, C. J. (2007). Evidence-Based Policy and Performance Management: Challenges and Prospects in Two Parallel Movements. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Holt, T. (2010). The Deceivers: Allied Military Deception in the Second World War. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  41. Howarth, D. (2010). Power, Discourse and Policy: Articulating a Hegemony Approach to Critical Policy Studies. Critical Policy Studies, 3(3–4), 309–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hudson, J., Lowe, S., Oscroft, N., & Snell, C. (2007). Activating Policy Networks: A Case Study of Local Environmental Policy-Making in the United Kingdom. Policy Studies, 28(1), 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hughes, C. E. (2007). Evidence-Based Policy or Policy-Based Evidence? The Role of Evidence in the Development and Implementation of the Illicit Drug Diversion Initiative. Drug & Alcohol Review, 26(4), 363–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Inda, J. X. (2005). Analytics of the Modern: An Introduction. In J. X. Inda (Ed.), Anthropologies of Modernity: Foucault, Governmentality, and Life Politics (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kubal, T. J. (1998). The Presentation of Political Self: Cultural Resonance and the Construction of Collective Action Frames. The Sociological Quarterly, 39, 539–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Latour, B. (1994). On Technical Mediation—Philosophy, Sociology, Genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29–62.Google Scholar
  48. Mann, M. (1986). The Sources of Social Power: Volume 1, A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Mann, M. (1993). The Sources of Social Power: Volume 2, The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Mann, M. (2012). The Sources of Social Power: Volume 3, Global Empires and Revolution, 1890–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Marx, K. (1993). Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft). London: Penguin Books in association with New Left Review.Google Scholar
  52. Medvetz, T. (2012). Think Tanks in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Meyer, J. W. (2010). World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World Society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The “Actors” of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Miller, H. T., & Fox, C. J. (2001). The Epistemic Community. Administration & Society, 32(6), 668–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990). Governing Economic Life. Economy and Society, 19(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1994). On Therapeutic Authority: Psychoanalytical Expertise Under Advanced Liberalism. History of the Human Sciences, 7(3), 29–64.  https://doi.org/10.1177/095269519400700302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1997). Mobilizing the Consumer: Assembling the Subject of Consumption. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(1), 1–36.  https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014001001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Naím, M. (2013). The End of Power: From Boardrooms to Battlefields and Churches to States, Why Being in Charge Isn’t What It Used to Be. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
  61. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (1st ed.). New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  62. Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  63. Parsons, T. (1964). Evolutionary Universals in Society. American Sociological Review, 29(3), 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Parsons, T. (1966). Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  65. Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Radcliffe, S. (2010). Non-rational Aspects of the Competition State—The Case of Policy Consultancy in Australia. Policy Studies, 31(1), 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The New Governance: Governing Without Government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rose, N. (1996). Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Rose, N. (1999a). Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Free Association Press.Google Scholar
  70. Rose, N. (1999b). Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Rose, N. (2000). Community, Citizenship, and the Third Way. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(9), 1395–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rose, N. (2007). The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government. The British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rose, N., O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2(1), 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Scheufele, B. (2006). Frames, Schemata and News Reporting. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 31, 65–83.Google Scholar
  76. Simmons, B. A., & Elkins, Z. (2004). The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy. The American Political Science Review, 98(1), 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master Frames and Cycles of Protest. In A. Morris & C. McClurg Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (pp. 133–155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Stone, D. (2000). Non-Governmental Policy Transfer: The Strategies of Independent Policy Institutes. Governance, 13(1), 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stone, D. (2001). Think Tanks, Global Lesson-Drawing and Networking Social Policy Ideas. Global Social Policy, 1(3), 338–360.  https://doi.org/10.1177/146801810100100304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stone, D. (2002). Introduction: Global Knowledge and Advocacy Networks. Global Networks, 2(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Waldman, T. (2003). We All Want to Change the World: Rock and Politics from Elvis to Eminem (1st ed.). Lanham, MD: Taylor Trade Publishing.Google Scholar
  82. Walton, D. N. (1997). Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Zapp, M. (2017a). The Scientization of the World Polity: International Organizations and the Production of Scientific Knowledge, 1950–2015. International Sociology, 33(1), 3–26.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580917742003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zapp, M. (2017b). The World Bank and Education: Governing (Through) Knowledge. International Journal of Educational Development, 53, 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tampere UniversityTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations