Advertisement

Reverse Engineering and Straightforward Design as Tools to Improve the Teaching of Mechanical Engineering

  • Eusebio Jiménez LópezEmail author
  • Mario Acosta Flores
  • Gabriel Luna Sandoval
  • Baldomero Lucero Velázquez
  • Juan José Delfín Vázquez
  • Luis Andrés García Velásquez
Chapter

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The challenges imposed by today’s societies, which demand products and services of quality and of greater technological complexity, require the formation of highly trained human resources, which confront the various problems that arise in industries. Reverse engineering and the direct design are applied to solve problems in companies and universities. These methods, in combination with active methodologies, provide tools that potentiate the teaching of engineering. This article presents a proposal for the definition of reverse engineering and its application, together with the direct design method, in the development of novel procedures oriented toward the teaching of engineering.

Design/Method/Approach: The procedures are logical sequences of the tasks and activities that are applied to pose or raise problems of mechanics and to make systematic measurements of components, as well as to document the designs of the products. To show the application of active methodologies in learning, the project-based learning (PBL) is used in a case study.

Results/Anticipations: The proposed definition of reverse engineering allowed to generate procedures to support students in the measurement of pieces. In addition, the nine steps of direct design promote order and the systematization in the development of a product and establish the importance of documenting a project as the basis of technology development. In order to potentiate engineering education, it is necessary to incorporate active learning methods, such as the PBL.

Conclusions: Reverse engineering and the direct design method are two methods that assist engineering education. The procedures described in this paper, together with the PBL, promote the formation of generic and specific competences, as well as the order, systematization, and normalization in projects that implies measurements and component design, to the benefit of engineering education and of the industrial sector.

Keywords

Reverse engineering, Engineering education, Metrology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors of this work thank the La Salle University Northwest, the Technological University of the South of Sonora, the Sonora State University, the Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, and the Higher Technological Institute of Cajeme, for the facilities and support that led to the realization of this work.

References

  1. Ali, S., Durupt, A., & Adragna, A. (2013). Reverse engineering for manufacturing approach: Based on the combination of 3D and knowledge information. In M. Abramovici & R. Stark (Eds.), Smart product engineering, LNPE (pp. 137–146). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, L. (2018). Competency-based education: Recent policy trends. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 3(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrio, R., Blanco, E., Martínez, J., & Galdo, M. (2010). Learning oriented to fluid mechanics projects through experimentation with water rockets. Net-U. Journal of University Teaching, (2). Recovered on March 18, 2012 from http://www.um.es/ead/Red_U/?/
  4. Beamud, E., Nuñez, P., García, E., & García, J. (2017). Reverse engineering applied to the teaching of computer aided manufacturing. Materials Science Forum, 903, 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chattopadhyay, S. (2017). Material and processing basics through reverse engineering. In 2017 ASEE annual conference & exposition, June 25–28. Columbus: American Society for Engineering Education.Google Scholar
  6. Conwell, J., Catalano, G., & Beard, J. (1993). A case study in creative problem solving in engineering design. Journal of Engineering Education, 82(1), 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curtis, S., Harston, S., & Mattson, C. (2011). The fundamentals of barriers to reverse engineering and their implementation into mechanical components. Research in Engineering Design, 22, 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eggert, R. (2005). Engineering design. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Eilam, E. (2005). Reversing: Secrets of reverse engineering. Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Farhana, N., Tasir, Z., Abd, N., & Mohamad, Z. (2017). Project-based learning from constructivism point of view. Advanced Science Letters, 23(8), 7904–7906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernández, A. (2005). Nuevas metodologías docentes. Recuperado el 12 de marzo de 2013 de http://tecnologiaedu.us.es/mec2011/htm/mas/4/41/64.pdf
  12. Henri, M., Johnson, M., & Nepal, B. (2017). A review of competency-based learning: Tools, assessments, and recommendations. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 607–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hmelo, E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiménez, E., García, L., Longorio, R., Luna, A., Luna, G., Martínez, V., Delfín, J., & Ontiveros, S. (2012). Development procedures for the systematic measurement of parts and components, from an analytical programs of reverse engineering perspective. In XII international conference on engineering and technology education (pp. 37–41), March 11–14. Dili.Google Scholar
  15. Jiménez, E., Luna, G., Uzeta, C., García, L., Ontiveros, S., Martínez, V., Lucero, B., & Pérez, P. (2013a). Forward design process and reverse engineering considerations. In W. Aung et al. (Eds.), iNEER special volume: Innovations 2013 – world innovations in engineering education and research (pp. 197–207). Potomac: iNEER.Google Scholar
  16. Jiménez, E., Martínez, V., Reyes, L., Ontiveros, S., García, L., Luna, G., Vela, L., & Delfín, J. (2013b). Process design systematization for specific applications: Engineering education contribution. Journal of Modern Education Review, 3(5), 416–426.Google Scholar
  17. Jiménez, E., García, L., Delfín, J., Lucero, B., & Martínez, V. (2016). Trayectoria de las mediciones de la ingeniería inversa de partes y componentes. Simposio de Metrología. CENAM. 19 al 23 de septiembre. Qro, Querétaro.Google Scholar
  18. Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Report from the Committee on K-12 Education for the National Academies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  19. Labrador, J., & Andreu, M. (2008). Metodologías Activas. Valencia: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.Google Scholar
  20. Luna, G., Jiménez, E., García, L., Ontiveros, S., Reyes, L., Martínez, V., Delfín, J., & Lucero, B. (2011). Importance of research procedure in reverse engineering for engineering education. In W. Aung et al. (Eds.), Innovations 2011: World innovations in engineering education and research (pp. 379–390). Potomac: iNNER.Google Scholar
  21. Lysne, O. (2018). The Huawei and Snowden question, SimulaSpringerBriefs on computing. Cham: Springer Open.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitchell, W. J. (1993). A computational view of design creativity. In J. S. Gero & M. L. Maher (Eds.), Modeling creativity and knowledge-based creative design (pp. 25–42). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  23. Monat, J., & Gannon, T. (2018). Two professors experience with competence-based education. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 3(2), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Navarro, L., Jiménez, E., Bojórquez, I., & Ramírez, G. (2013). Competencies and teaching strategies: Experiences at the La Salle University Norwest. Ecorfan. Valley of Santiago. (1 ed.), Handbook.Google Scholar
  25. O’Brien, S., & Abulencia, P. (2010). Learning through reverse engineering. In American Society for Engineering Education annual conference and exposition 2010, 20–23 June. Louisville: American Society for Engineering Education.Google Scholar
  26. Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (2007). Engineering design: A systematic approach. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Raja, V. (2008). Introduction to reverse engineering. In V. Raja & K. J. Fernandes (Eds.), Reverse Engineering an industrial perspective (pp. 1–9). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sokól, K., & Cekus, D. (2017). Reverse engineering as a solution in parts restoration process. Procedia Engineering, 177, 210–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sreeram, R., Hussian, M., & Rao, S. (2016). Latest research on reverse engineering technology: Review. In Proceedings of the international conference on paradigms in engineering & technology (ICPET2016).Google Scholar
  31. Tembe, B. L., & Kamble, S. K. (2016). Implementation of active learning methods in mechanical engineering education to enhance students’ performance. In 2016 IEEE 40th annual computer software and applications conference (COMPSAC). Atlanta.  https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2016.12
  32. Tobón. (2008). Competency-based training in higher education: The complex approach. Retrieved on March 13, 2013 from http://www.conalepfresnillo.com/images/stories/conalep/Formaci%C3%B3n%20basada%20en%20competencias.%20Sergio%20Tob%C3%B3n.pdf
  33. Ullman, D. (2003). The mechanical design process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  34. Verner, I., & Betzer, N. (2001). Machine control – a design and technology discipline in Israel’s senior high schools. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(3), 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Verner, I., & Greenholts, M. (2017). Teacher education to analyze and design systems through reverse engineering. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 560, 122–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yu, T. (2016). STEM from the perspectives of engineering design and suggested tools and learning design. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 2(1), 59–71.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eusebio Jiménez López
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mario Acosta Flores
    • 2
  • Gabriel Luna Sandoval
    • 3
  • Baldomero Lucero Velázquez
    • 4
  • Juan José Delfín Vázquez
    • 4
  • Luis Andrés García Velásquez
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad La Salle Noroeste-UTS-IIMMCiudad ObregónMexico
  2. 2.Universidad Autónoma del Estado de MorelosCuernavacaMexico
  3. 3.Universidad Estatal de SonoraHermosilloMexico
  4. 4.Instituto Tecnológico Superior de CajemeCiudad ObregónMexico

Personalised recommendations