Advertisement

Pre-psoas Approaches for Thoracolumbar Interbody Fusion

  • James D. Lin
  • Jamal N. Shillingford
  • Joseph M. Lombardi
  • Richard W. Schutzer
  • Ronald A. LehmanJr.Email author
Chapter

Abstract

Interbody arthrodesis techniques are a useful method to achieve fusion, indirectly decompress neurologic structures, and correct deformity in the lumbar spine. The increasing popularity of minimally invasive surgery has led to an increased interest in anterior interbody fusion techniques. The antepsoas approach to lumbar interbody fusion is a useful technique that combines the benefits of ALIF and LLIF. This approach allows anterior access to the entire lumbar spine in a single lateral position, facilitates placement of a large interbody cage, and traverses a corridor that avoids the great vessels and lumbar plexus.

Keywords

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) Oblique Antepsoas (ATP) Interbody Fusion Lumbar spine Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) Minimally invasive 

References

  1. 1.
    Eismont FJ, Norton RP, Hirsch BP. Surgical management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg [Internet]. 2014;22:203–13. Available from: http://www.jaaos.org/content/22/4/203.abstract.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg [Internet]. 2015;1:2–18. Available from.  https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2414–469X.2015.10.05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eck JC, Hodges S, Humphreys SC. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:321–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Virk SS, Yu E. The top 50 articles on minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976). [Internet]. 2016;42:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006;6:435–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benglis DM, Vanni S, Levi AD. An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. J Neurosur Spine. 2009;10:139–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoppenfeld S, DeBoer P, Buckley R. Surgical exposures in orthopaedics. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2009.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deukmedjian AR, Le TV, Dakwar E, Martinez CR, Uribe JS. Movement of abdominal structures on magnetic resonance imaging during positioning changes related to lateral lumbar spine surgery: a morphometric study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16:615–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Woods KRM, Billys JB, Hynes RA. Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1???L5 (OLIF25) and at L5???S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates. Spine J. 2017;17:545–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Benglis DM, Vanni S, Levi AD. An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine [Internet]. 2009;10:139–44. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19278328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Molinares DM, Davis TT, Fung DA. Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs: an MRI study. J Neurosurg Spine [Internet]. 2015;24:1–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26451662.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mayer MH. Spine a new microsurgical technique for MI ALIF. Spine. 1997;22:691–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li JXJ, Phan K, Mobbs R. Oblique lumbar interbody fusion: technical aspects, operative outcomes, and complications. World Neurosurg. 2017;98:113–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mayer HM. A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet]. 1997;22:691–9; discussion 700. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9089943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong JM, Hilmi R, Roussouly P. Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients. Asian Spine J. 2012;6:89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mehren C, Mayer HM, Zandanell C, Siepe CJ, Korge A. The oblique anterolateral approach to the lumbar spine provides access to the lumbar spine with few early complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:2020–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • James D. Lin
    • 1
  • Jamal N. Shillingford
    • 1
  • Joseph M. Lombardi
    • 1
  • Richard W. Schutzer
    • 2
  • Ronald A. LehmanJr.
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Spine SurgeryThe Daniel and Jane Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian/AllenNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Vascular SurgeryNew York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical CenterNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Columbia University Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, The Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian/AllenNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations