Advertisement

Thoracoscopic Fusion

  • Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez
  • Christoph Wipplinger
  • Sertac Kirnaz
  • Eliana Kim
  • Roger HärtlEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Thoracoscopic spinal fusion procedures represent a minimally invasive alternative to conventional open transthoracic operations. A broad spectrum of pathologies, including degenerative, traumatic, and tumor conditions, can be managed with this technique. Several instrumentation devices have also been introduced to match the challenges of an endoscopic anterior approach including special screw-plate systems as well as expandable cages.

Preoperative planning involving choosing the most appropriate side for the approach, correct patient positioning, as well as portal placements are determining factors for the overall success of the operation.

Great care must be taken during soft tissue dissection to avoid larger vessel or lung injury. In order to visualize the lateral wall of the vertebrae, the attached rib heads have to be resected and can later be used as an interbody construct.

Discectomies in the lower thoracic spine often require instrumentation, which can be accomplished with plate and double-rod constructs. Corpectomy sites always need to be reconstructed. Expandable cages combined with anterolateral fixation devices are most widely used for this purpose.

The most common complications of thoracoscopic procedures involve the respiratory system due to single-lung ventilation and lung tissue retraction. Conversion to an open approach is always a possibility as intraoperative complications occur.

Keywords

Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) Thoracic spine Thoracic trauma Thoracic surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Jacobaeus H. Possibility of the use of a cystoscope for investigation of serous cavities. Munch Med Wochenschr. 1910;57:2090–2.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jacobaeus H. The practical importance of thoracoscopy on surgery of the chest. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1921;4:289–96.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dickmann CA, Perin NI. Instrumentation and equipment for thoracoscopic spine surgery. In: Thoracoscopic spine surgery. 1st ed. New York: Thieme; 1999. p. 27–48.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koller H, Zenner J, Hitzl W, Meier O, Ferraris L, Acosta F, et al. The morbidity of open transthoracic approach for anterior scoliosis correction. Spine [Internet]. 2010. [cited 2018 Nov 20];35(26). Available from: https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00007632-201012150-00013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Uribe JS, Smith WD, Pimenta L, Härtl R, Dakwar E, Modhia UM, et al. Minimally invasive lateral approach for symptomatic thoracic disc herniation: initial multicenter clinical experience. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Mar;16(3):264–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yanni DS, Connery C, Perin NI. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery combined with a tubular retractor system for minimally invasive thoracic discectomy. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(1 Suppl Operative):138–43; discussion 143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dickmann CA, Rosenthal DJ. Thoracoscopic corpectomy. In: Thoracoscopic spine surgery. 1st ed. New York: Thieme; 1999. p. 271–91.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beisse R, Kim DH. Spinal instrumentation: surgical techniques. New York: Thieme; 2005. p. 418–23.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dickman C, Sasso R, Zdeblick T. Vantage anterior fixation system. In: Spinal instrumentation: surgical techniques. New York: Thieme; 2005. p. 432–7.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chou D, Larios AE, Chamberlain RH, Fifield MS, Hartl R, Dickman CA, et al. A biomechanical comparison of three anterior thoracolumbar implants after corpectomy: are two screws better than one? J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4(3):213–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kan P, Schmidt MH. Minimally invasive thoracoscopic approach for anterior decompression and stabilization of metastatic spine disease. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;25(2):E8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ragel BT, Amini A, Schmidt MH. Thoracoscopic vertebral body replacement with an expandable cage after ventral spinal canal decompression. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(5 Suppl 2):317–22; discussion 322–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brazenor GA. Comparison of multisegment anterior cervical fixation using bone strut graft versus a titanium rod and buttress prosthesis: analysis of outcome with long-term follow-up and interview by independent physician. Spine. 2007;32(1):63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dai L-Y, Jiang L-S, Jiang S-D. Anterior-only stabilization using plating with bone structural autograft versus titanium mesh cages for two- or three-column thoracolumbar burst fractures: a prospective randomized study. Spine. 2009;34(14):1429–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lu DC, Wang V, Chou D. The use of allograft or autograft and expandable titanium cages for the treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(1):122–9; discussion 129–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosenthal DJ, Dickmann CA. Operating room setup and patient positioning. In: Thoracoscopic spine surgery. 1st ed. New York: Thieme; 1999. p. 125–42.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bisson EF, Jost GF, Apfelbaum RI, Schmidt MH. Thoracoscopic discectomy and instrumented fusion using a minimally invasive plate system: surgical technique and early clinical outcome. Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Apr;30(4):E15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim DH, Balabhadra R, Potulski M, Beisse RW. Anterior thoracoscopic vertebral reconstruction and instrumentation. In: An anatomical approach to minimally invasive spine surgery. St. Louis: QMP; 2006. p. 481–96.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dickmann CA, Rosenthal DJ. Thoracoscopic access strategies: portal placement techniques and portal selection. In: Thoracoscopic spine surgery. 1st ed. New York: Thieme; 1999. p. 107–27.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dickmann CA, Rosenthal DJ. Spinal exposure and pleural dissection techniques. In: Thoracoscopic spine surgery. 1st ed. New York: Thieme; 1999. p. 125–42.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dickmann CA, Rosenthal DJ, Perin NI. Thoracoscopic microsurgical discectomy. In: Thoracoscopic spine surgery. 1st ed. New York: Thieme; 1999. p. 221–44.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Krisht KM, Mumert ML, Schmidt MH. Management considerations and strategies to avoid complications associated with the thoracoscopic approach for corpectomy. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;31(4):E14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez
    • 1
  • Christoph Wipplinger
    • 1
  • Sertac Kirnaz
    • 1
  • Eliana Kim
    • 1
  • Roger Härtl
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryWeill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, Weill Cornell MedicineNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations