Remedies and Sanctions in Case of Confidentiality Breach

  • Elza Reymond-Eniaeva
Part of the European Yearbook of International Economic Law book series (EUROYEAR, volume 7)


We will see that a number of remedies and sanctions are available against the persons having breached their confidentiality duties. These are, for example, confidentiality order and injunctive relief, claim for compensation of damages, criminal and disciplinary sanctions, termination of the contract and reputational damage. We will examine the problem of remedies and sanctions in the same order we proceeded in the section dealing with the persons bound by a duty of confidentiality. We will review the remedies and sanctions available against the parties, the arbitrators, the arbitration institution, the counsel and third persons.


  1. Beale HG (ed) (2015) Chitty on contracts, 32nd edn. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackaby N, Partasides C et al (2015) Redfern and hunter on international arbitration, 6th edn. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Born GB (2014) International commercial arbitration, 2nd edn. Walters KluwerGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown AC (2001) Presumption meets reality: an exploration of the confidentiality obligation in international commercial arbitration. Am Univ Int Law Rev 16(4):969–1025Google Scholar
  5. Bucher A (2011) Commentary of Article 183 of the private international law act. In: Bucher A (ed) Loi sur le droit international privé/Convention de Lugano, Commentaire Romand. BasleGoogle Scholar
  6. Furrer A (2008) The duty of confidentiality in international arbitration. In: Mélanges en l’honneur de Pierre Tercier. GenèveGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaillard E, Savage J (eds) (1999) Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on international commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law InternationalGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilliéron P (2011) Les dommages-intérêts contractuels. CEDIDAC, LausanneGoogle Scholar
  9. Hwang M, Chung K (2010) Confidentiality in arbitration. N Z Law J 4:153–156Google Scholar
  10. Jeandin N (2011) Commentary of Article 166 of the code of civil procedure. In: Bohnet F, Haldy J, Jeandin N, Schweizer P, Tappy D (eds) Code de Procédure Civile Commenté. BasleGoogle Scholar
  11. Jolivet E (ed) (2011) Decisions on ICC arbitration procedure/A selection of procedural orders issued by arbitral tribunal acting under the ICC rules of arbitration (2003–2004), 2010 Special Supplement. International Chamber of CommerceGoogle Scholar
  12. Jolles A, Stark-Traber S, Canals de Cediel M (2013) Chapter 7: confidentiality. In: Geisinger E, Voser N (eds) International arbitration in Switzerland: a handbook for practitioners, 2nd edn. Kluwer Law International, pp 131–152Google Scholar
  13. Lazareff S (2009) Confidentiality and arbitration: theoretical and philosophical reflections. In: Confidentiality in arbitration/ Commentaries on rules, statutes, case law and practice/ A special supplement to the ICC international court of arbitration bulletin. ICC Publication No. 700, pp 81–93Google Scholar
  14. Lew JDM (2013) Chapter 21: confidentiality in arbitrations in England. In: Lew JDM, Bor H et al (eds) Arbitration in England, with chapters on Scotland and Ireland. Kluwer Law InternationalGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu C (2005) The concept of fundamental breach: perspectives from the CISG, UNIDROIT principles and PECL and case law, 2nd edn. May 2005, CISG Database. Available at Last visited 13 Sept 2018
  16. Loquin E (2015) L’arbitrage du commerce international : pratique des affaires. Issy-les-Moulineaux: Joly éditionsGoogle Scholar
  17. Maurer P, Gross JP (2010) Commentary of Article 13 LLCA. In: Vaticos M, Reiser CM, Chappuis B (eds) Loi sur les avocats, Commentaire romand, Basle, pp 142–211Google Scholar
  18. Mooser M (2012a) Commentary of article 160 of the code of obligations. In: Thévenoz L, Werro F (eds) Code des Obligations I, Commentaire romand, 2nd edn. Basle, pp 1157–1163Google Scholar
  19. Mooser M (2012b) Commentary of article 163 of the code of obligations. In: Thévenoz L, Werro F (eds) Code des Obligations I, Commentaire romand, 2nd edn. Basle, pp 1157–1163Google Scholar
  20. Müller C (2005) La confidentialité en arbitrage commercial international: un trompe-l’oeil. ASA Bull 23(2):216–240Google Scholar
  21. Philippin E (2013) Société simple. Not@lex, pp 125–126Google Scholar
  22. Ritz P (2007) Die Geheimhaltung im Schiedsverfahren nach schweizerischem Recht. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  23. Schöldström P (1998) The Arbitrator’s mandate, a comparative study of relationships in commercial arbitration under the laws of England, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. Stockholm University, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  24. Smahi N (2016) The arbitrator’s liability and immunity under Swiss law – part I. ASA Bull 34(4):876–896Google Scholar
  25. Tjio H (2009) The limits of confidentiality in arbitration/Emmott v. Michael Wilson & Partners. Lloyd’s Marit Commer Law Q 1:10–15Google Scholar
  26. Werro F (2012a) Commentary of Article 41 of the code of obligations. In: Thévenoz L, Werro F (eds), Code des Obligations I, Commentaire romand, 2nd edn. Basle, pp 353–393Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elza Reymond-Eniaeva
    • 1
  1. 1.LausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations