Advertisement

The Cultural Contribution of Science Education

  • Michael R. Matthews
Chapter
Part of the Science: Philosophy, History and Education book series (SPHE)

Abstract

Feng shui makes claims about the constitution and processes of the natural world, including causal influences on people’s physical and mental health, that are in opposition to established scientific knowledge. These claims should be scientifically examined. Since the eighteenth century Enlightenment, science, and science-informed technology have been seen as fundamental for the material and cultural improvement of society. The former assuredly do not guarantee the latter, but they can and do contribute an enormous amount to their realization. Usefully the history and philosophy of science (HPS) can illuminate pedagogical, curricular, and theoretical issues in science education. Despite enormous investments in modern education, there is persistent evidence that unscientific, antiscientific, and pseudoscientific beliefs and worldviews are as common as they ever were. It is educationally and culturally irresponsible to leave all such antiscientific or unwarranted beliefs unexamined. Feng shui warrants the attention of educators because of its deep cultural roots, its significant personal and social impact, and its propensity to accustom people to believe in things about the world for which there is no compelling evidence. Appraisal of feng shui in classrooms requires explication of a number of core issues in philosophy and in science education.

References

  1. Aarnio, K., & Lindeman, M. (2005). Paranormal beliefs, education, and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1227–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agassi, J. (2013). The very idea of modern science: Francis Bacon and Robert Boyle. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alcock, J. E. (2018). Belief: What it means to believe and why our convictions are so compelling. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  4. Alston, W. P. (1985). Divine foreknowledge and alternative conceptions of human freedom. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 18(1), 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS. Also published by Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. Andersen, K. (2017). Fantasyland: How America went Haywire, a 500-year history. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
  7. Arons, A. B. (1983). Achieving wider scientific literacy. Daedalus, 112(2), 91–122.Google Scholar
  8. Bacon, F. (1620/1939). Novum organum. In E. A. Burt (Ed.), The English philosophers from Bacon to Mill (pp. 24–123). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  9. Bailin, S., & Siegel, H. (2003). Critical thinking. In N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. Smith, & P. Standish (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of education (pp. 181–193). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Baillie, J. (1951). The belief in progress. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  11. Baum, G. (Ed.). (1967). The future of belief debate. New York: Herder & Herder.Google Scholar
  12. Berkman, M. B., Pancheco, J. S., & Plutzer, E. (2008, May). Evolution and creationism in America’s classrooms: A national portrait. PLOS: Biology.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beyerstein, B. L., & Sampson, W. (1996a). Traditional medicine and pseudoscience in China: A report of the second CSICOP delegation (part 1). Skeptical Inquirer, 20(4). https://www.csicop.org/si/show/china_conference_1
  14. Beyerstein, B. L., & Sampson, W. (1996b). Traditional medicine and pseudoscience in China: A report of the second CSICOP delegation (part 2). Skeptical Inquirer, 20(5). https://www.csicop.org/si/show/china_conference_2
  15. Bhakthavatsalam, S. (2019). The value of false theories in science education. Science & Education, 28(1–2), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bhargava, P. M., & Chakrabarti, C. (1995). The scientific temper and the scientific method in science in India through history, with special reference to biology. In D. P. Chattopadhyaya & R. Kumar (Eds.), Mathematics, astronomy and biology in Indian tradition: Some conceptual preliminaries (pp. 28–55). New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research.Google Scholar
  17. Bhargava, P. M., & Chakrabarti, C. (Eds.). (2010). Devils and science: A collection of articles on scientific temper. New Delhi: National Book Trust.Google Scholar
  18. Boudry, M. (2017). Plus ultra: Why science does not have limits. In M. Boudry & M. Pigliucci (Eds.), Science unlimited? The challenges of scientism (pp. 31–52). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bruun, O. (2003). Fengshui in China: Geomantic divination between state orthodoxy and popular religion. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  20. Buchdahl, G. (1969). Metaphysics and the philosophy of science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Bunge, M. (1986). In defence of realism and scientism. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 4, 23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bunge, M. (2006). Chasing reality: Strife over realism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Burtt, E. A. (1932). The metaphysical foundations of modern physical science (2nd ed.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (First edition, 1924).Google Scholar
  24. Bury, J. B. (1920). The idea of progress: An inquiry into its origin and growth. New York: Macmillan. Reprinted 1982, Greenwood Press, Westport.Google Scholar
  25. Bussmann, B., & Kötter, M. (2018). Between scientism and relativism: Epistemic competence as an important aim in science and philosophy of education. RISTAL: Research in Subject-Matter Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 82–101.Google Scholar
  26. Butterfield, J., & Pagonis, C. (Eds.). (1999). From physics to philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Campion, N. (2016). Astrology and popular religion in the modern west: Prophecy, cosmology and the new age movement. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cohen, I. B. (1995). Science and the founding fathers: Science in the political thought of Jefferson, Franklin, Adams, and Madison. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  29. Commager, H. S. (1977). The empire of reason: How Europe imagined and America realized the enlightenment. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  30. Condorcet, N. (1976). In K. M. Baker (Ed.), Selected writings. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  31. d’Espagnat, B. (2006). On physics and philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Dainian, F., & Cohen, R. S. (Eds.). (1996). Chinese studies in the history and philosophy of science and technology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Dallal, A. (2010). Islam, science, and the challenge of history. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Davies, M., & Barnett, R. (Eds.). (2015). The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Dawes, R. (2001). Everyday irrationality: How pseudo-scientists, lunatics, and the rest of us systematically fail to think rationally. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  36. de Groot, J. J. M. (1892–1910). The religious system of China (6 Vols.). Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
  37. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings, and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dewey, J. (1938). Unity of science as a social problem. In O. Neurath, R. Carnap, & C. W. Morris (Eds.), International encyclopedia of unified science (Vol. 1, pp. 29–38). London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Eder, E., Turic, K., Milasowszky, N., van Adzin, K., & Hergovich, A. (2010). The relationships between paranormal belief, creationism, intelligent design and evolution at secondary schools in Vienna (Austria). Science & Education, 20(5–6), 517–534.Google Scholar
  40. Edis, T. (2007). An illusion of harmony: Science and religion in Islam. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  41. Educational Policies Commission (EPC). (1966). Education and the spirit of science. Washington, DC: National Education Association.Google Scholar
  42. Elliot, T. (2013, April 20). Witch-hunt. Sydney Morning Herald, Good Weekend, pp. 16–21.Google Scholar
  43. Eve, R. A., & Dunn, D. (1990). Psychic powers, astrology, and creationism in the classroom? American Biology Teacher, 52, 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fang, L. (1987/1992). Interview with Tiziano Terzani. In L. Fang (Ed.), Bringing down the Great Wall: Writings on science, culture, and democracy in China (pp. 207–217). New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  45. Fasce, A., & Picó, A. (2019). Science as a vaccine: The relation between scientific literacy and unwarranted beliefs. Science & Education, 28(1–2), 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Feuchtwang, S. (2003). An anthropological analysis of Chinese geomancy. Bangkok: White Lotus.Google Scholar
  47. Fishman, Y. I. (2009). Can science test supernatural worldviews? Science & Education, 18(6–7), 813–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fishman, Y. I., & Boudry, M. (2013). Does science presuppose naturalism (or, indeed, anything at all)? Science & Education, 22(5), 921–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Freedman, M. (1974). On the sociological study of Chinese religion. In A. P. Wolf (Ed.), Religion and ritual in Chinese society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Friedlander, M. W. (1995). At the fringes of science. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  51. Gallup, G. H., Jr., & Newport, F. (1991). Belief in paranormal phenomena among adult American. Skeptical Inquirer, 15, 137–147.Google Scholar
  52. Gardner, M. (1981). Science: Good, bad and bogus: A skeptical look at extraordinary claims. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  53. Gaukroger, S. (2001). Francis Bacon and the transformation of early-modern philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gauld, C. F. (1982). The scientific attitude and science education: A critical reappraisal. Science Education, 66(1), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Gauld, C. F. (2005). Habits of mind, scholarship and decision making in science and religion. Science & Education, 14(4–5), 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Gill, H. V. (1943). Fact and fiction in modern science. Dublin: M.H. Gill & Son.Google Scholar
  57. Gjertsen, D. (1989). Science and philosophy: Past and present. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  58. Goode, E. (2011). The paranormal: Who believes, why they believe, and why it matters. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  59. Graham, L. R. (1973). Science and philosophy in the Soviet Union. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  60. Grim, P. (Ed.). (1990). Philosophy of science and the occult. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  61. Gross, P. R., Levitt, N., & Lewis, M. W. (Eds.). (1996). The flight from science and reason. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, (distributed by Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
  62. Haack, S. (2016). Scientism and its discontents. London: Rounded Globe Publishers.Google Scholar
  63. Hall, H. (2006). Teaching pigs to sing: An experiment in bringing critical thinking to the masses. Skeptical Inquirer, 30(3), 36–39.Google Scholar
  64. Hankins, T. L. (1985). Science and the enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hill, K. (2013, September 25). The feng shui way: A catastrophe for city planning. Skeptical Inquirer.Google Scholar
  66. Hines, T. (2003). Pseudoscience and the paranormal (2nd ed.). Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  67. Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teachers’ guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  68. Hodson, D. (2014). Nature of science in the science curriculum: Origin, development and shifting emphases. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 911–970). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  69. Hume, D. (1739/1888). A treatise of human nature: Being an attempt to introduce the experimental method of reasoning into moral subjects. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  70. Huston, P. (1995). China, chi and chicanary: Examining traditional Chinese medicine and chi theory. Skeptical Inquirer, 19(5), 38–42.Google Scholar
  71. Jefferson, T. (1787/1982). Notes on the state of Virginia. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  72. Jenkins, E. W. (2019). Science for all: The struggle to establish school science in England. London: University College of London Institute of Education Press.Google Scholar
  73. Johnson, M., & Pigliucci, M. (2004). Is knowledge of science associated with higher skepticism of pseudoscientific claims? The American Biology Teacher, 66(8), 536–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kahneman, D. (2013). Thinking Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux. New York.Google Scholar
  75. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Kaminer, W. (1999). Sleeping with extra-terrestrials: The rise of irrationalism and the perils of piety. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  77. Kelly, I. W. (1982). Astrology, cosmobiology and humanistic astrology. In P. Grim (Ed.), Philosophy of science and the occult (pp. 47–68). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  78. Kenny, A. (1985). A path from Rome: An autobiography. London: Sidgwick & Jackson.Google Scholar
  79. Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ladyman, J. (2011). The scientistic stance: The empirical and materialist stances reconciled. Synthese, 178(1), 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ladyman, J. (2018). Scientism with a humane face. In J. de Ridder, R. Peels, & R. van Woudenberg (Eds.), Scientism: Prospects and problems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Laugksch, E. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., & Lederman, J. (2014). The development, use, and interpretation of nature of science assessments. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 971–997). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  84. Liftig, I. F. (2009, September). Nurturing scientific habits of mind. Science Scope.Google Scholar
  85. Lin, Z. X., Yu, L., Guo, Y. Z., Zhang, H. L., Shen, Z. Y., & Zhang, T. L. (2000). Qigong: Chinese medicine or pseudoscience? Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  86. Lindeman, M., & Aarnio, K. (2007). Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 731–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Losh, S. C., & Nzekwe, B. (2011). Creatures in the classroom: Preservice teacher beliefs about fantastic beasts, magic, extrterrstrials, evolution and creationism. Science & Education, 20(5–6), 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Martin, M. (1971). The use of pseudo-science in science education. Science Education, 55, 53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Martin, M. (1994). Pseudoscience, the paranormal, and science education. Science & Education, 3(4), 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Matthews, M. R. (Ed.). (2009a). Science, worldviews and education. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  92. Matthews, M. R. (2009b). Teaching the philosophical and worldview components of science. Science & Education, 18(6–7), 697–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Matthews, M. R. (2011). From nature of science (NOS) to features of science (FOS). In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Nature of science research: Concepts and methodologies (pp. 1–26). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  94. Matthews, M. R. (Ed.). (2014a). International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (3 Vols.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  95. Matthews, M. R. (2015a). Science teaching: The contribution of history and philosophy of science: 20th anniversary revised and enlarged edition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  96. Matthews, M. R. (2019b). The contribution of philosophy to science teacher education. In A. D. Colgan & B. Maxwell (Eds.), Philosophical thinking in teacher education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  97. Mbali, M. (2004). AIDS discourses and the South African state: Government denialism and post-apartheid AIDS policy-making. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 54(1), 104–122.  https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2004.0023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. McIntyre, L. C. (2019). The scientific attitude: Defending science from denial, fraud, and pseudoscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  99. Miller, J. D. (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Mooney, C., & Kirshenbaum, S. (2009). Unscientific America: How American scientific illiteracy threatens our future. Basic Books.Google Scholar
  101. Mugaloglu, E. Z. (2014). Constructivism and pseudoscience in the science classroom. Science & Education, 23(4), 829–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Musella, D. P. (2005). Gallup poll shows that Americans’ belief in the paranormal persists. The Skeptical Inquirer, 29(5), 5.Google Scholar
  103. Nanda, M. (2003). Prophets facing backward. Postmodern critiques of science and Hindu nationalism in India. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  104. National Science Foundation (NSF). (2002). Science and engineering: Indicators 2002. Science and technology: Public attitudes and public understanding. Science Fiction and Pseudoscience. www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/
  105. Nehru, J. L. (1946/1981). The discovery of India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Newton, I. (1730/1979). Opticks or a treatise of the reflections, refractions, inflections & colours of light. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  107. Offit, P. (2013). Do you believe in magic? The sense and nonsense of alternative medicine. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  108. Orenstein, A. (2002). Religion and paranormal belief. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Otto, S. (2016). The war on science: Who is waging it, why it matters, what we can do about it. Minneapolis: Milkweed.Google Scholar
  110. Outram, D. (2005). The enlightenment (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Paine, T. (1797/2004). The age of reason, being an investigation of true and fabulous theology. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  112. Park, R. L. (2000). Voodoo science: The road from foolishness to fraud. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  113. Park, R. L. (2008). Superstition: Belief in the age of science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Passmore, J. A. (1970). The perfectibility of man. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  115. Paton, M. J. (2013). Five classics of feng shui: Chinese spiritual geography in historical and environmental perspective. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Pennock, R. T. (2002). Should creationism be taught in the public schools? Science & Education, 11(2), 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Pigliucci, M. (2007). The evolution-creation wars: Why teaching more science just is not enough. McGill Journal of Education, 42(2), 285–306.Google Scholar
  118. Pigliucci, M. (2010). Nonsense on stilts: How to tell science from bunk (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Pigliucci, M., & Boudry, M. (Eds.). (2013). Philosophy of pseudoscience: Reconsidering the demarcation problem. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  120. Preece, P. F. W., & Baxter, J. H. (2000). Scepticism and gullibility: The superstitious and pseudo-scientific beliefs of secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 22(11), 1147–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Puro, J. (2002). Feng shui. In M. Shermer (Ed.), The skeptic encyclopedia of pseudoscience (pp. 102–112). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  122. Queenan, J. (2002). Beyond feng shui. Skeptical Inquirer, 12(4).Google Scholar
  123. Radner, D., & Radner, M. (1982). Science and unreason. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  124. Rice, T. W. (2003). Believe it or not: Religious and other paranormal beliefs in the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 729–779). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  126. Sagan, C. (1996). The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. London: Headline Book Publishing.Google Scholar
  127. Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  128. Shermer, M. (1997). Why people believe weird things: Pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time. New York: W.H. Freemand.Google Scholar
  129. Smith, J. C. (2010). Pseudoscience and extraordinary claims of the paranormal: A critical Thinker’s toolkit. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  130. Sorell, T. (1991). Scientism: Philosophy and the infatuation with science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  131. Specter, M. (2009). Denialism: How irrational thinking prevents scientific Progress, harms the planet and threatens our lives. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  132. Sprod, T. (2014). Philosophical inquiry and critical thinking in primary and secondary science education. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1531–1564). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  133. Squires, N. (2017, October 3). Italians turn to fortune-tellers and occult as economy slumps. The Telegraph. https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/world/italians-turn-to-fortunetellers-and-occult-as-economy-slumps-20171003-gyt347.html.
  134. Starck, M. (1982). Astrology: Key to holistic health. Birmingham: Seek-It Publications.Google Scholar
  135. Stark, E. (2012). Enhancing and assessing critical thinking in a psychological research methods course. Teaching of Psychology, 39, 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Stenger, V. J. (1990). Physics and psychics: The search for a world beyond the senses. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  137. Sutherland, S. (1992). Irrationality: The enemy within. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  138. Thurs, D. P., & Numbers, R. L. (2013). Science, pseudoscience, and science falsely so-called. In M. Pigliucci & M. Boudry (Eds.), Philosophy of pseudoscience: Reconsidering the demarcation problem (pp. 121–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Tobacyk, J. (2004). A revised paranormal belief scale. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 23, 94–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Trefil, J. S. (1996). Scientific literacy. In P. R. Gross, N. Levitt, & M. W. Lewis (Eds.), The flight from science and reason (pp. 543–550). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  141. Tresmontant, C. (1965). Christian metaphysics. New York: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
  142. Trusted, J. (1991). Physics and metaphysics: Theories of space and time. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  143. Turgut, H. (2011). The context of demarcation in nature of science teaching: The case of astrology. Science & Education, 20(5–6), 491–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Uglow, J. (2002). The lunar men: Five friends whose curiosity changed the world. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  145. Urbach, P. (1987). Francis Bacon’s philosophy of science. La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  146. Walker, W. R., Hoekstra, S. J., & Vogl, R. J. (2002). Science education is no guarantee of skepticism. Skeptic, 9, 24–28.Google Scholar
  147. Weinert, F. (2005). The scientist as philosopher: Philosophical consequences of great scientific discoveries. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  148. Wilson, J. A. (2018). Reducing pseudoscientific and paranormal beliefs in university students through a course in science and critical thinking. Science & Education.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9956-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Yang, C. K. (1970). Religion in Chinese society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  150. Yoon, H.-K. (2006). The culture of fengshui in Korea: An exploration of East Asian geomancy. Plymouth: Rowan & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  151. Zimmerman, M. (1995). Science, nonscience, and nonsense. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael R. Matthews
    • 1
  1. 1.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations