Advertisement

Still Falling at the First Hurdle: Examining Early Grade Reading in South Africa

  • Nic SpaullEmail author
  • Elizabeth Pretorius
Chapter
Part of the Policy Implications of Research in Education book series (PIRE, volume 10)

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of what we know about reading outcomes in South Africa. After an initial survey of some foundational tenets of reading research we show that while reading outcomes in South Africa improved between 2006 and 2011 they have stagnated between 2011 and 2016. The most recent PIRLS study (2016) showed that 78% of Grade 4 children cannot read for meaning in any language. There is nothing inevitable about these results. The knowledge and instructional practices required to teach children to read – as well as the resources needed to do it – are known and well understood internationally, even in high-poverty contexts. We argue that the inequalities evident in the schooling system have their roots in unequal life chances doled out at birth and consolidated through differential reading trajectories. Moving beyond the ‘comprehension iceberg’ we document what lies beneath these dire results. The majority of children have not mastered the basics of decoding in their home language in Grade 1 or 2 making reading for meaning or pleasure unlikely. We advocate an approach focusing on early reading success and ensuring that teachers know how to teach reading, that they have the materials to do so, that children have ready access to books and that reading outcomes are assessed annually.

Keywords

Poverty Inequalities in reading Decoding Reading comprehension Oral language proficiency 

References

  1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Learning and thinking about print. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  3. Aro, M., & Wimmer, H. (2003). Learning to read: English in comparison to six more regular orthographies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(4), 621–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biemiller, A. (2012). Teaching vocabulary in the primary grades: Vocabulary instruction needed. In E. Kame’enui & J. Baumann (Eds.), Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice (pp. 34–50). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, B. W., & Saks, D. H. (1986). Measuring the effects of instructional time on student learning: Evidence from the beginning teacher evaluation study. American Journal of Education, 94(4), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1086/443863 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Corson, D. (1997). The learning and use of academic English words. Language Learning, 47(4), 671–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the brain: The new science of how we read. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Department of Basic Education. (2014). Second Detailed Indicator Report for Basic Education Sector. Pretoria.Google Scholar
  12. Department of Basic Education. (2018). NEIMS Standard Reports January 2018. National Education Infrastructure Management System. Pretoria.Google Scholar
  13. EGRS. (2018). Early grade Reading study (EGRS I & II). Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.Google Scholar
  14. Farkas, G., & Beron, K. (2004). The detailed age trajectory of oral vocabulary knowledge: Differences by class and race. Social Science Research 33(3), 464–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2003.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fleisch, B. (2008). Primary education in crisis: Why South African school children underachieve in reading and mathematics. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
  16. Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame’enui, E. J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gxilishe, D. (1996). The dilemma of dialect in the classroom: A case for Xhosa. Per Linguam, 12(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  18. Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (2003). The early catastrophe: The 30 million word gap by age 3. American Educator, 27(1), 4–9.Google Scholar
  20. Helman, L. A., & Burns, M. K. (2008). What does oral language have to do with it? Helping young english-language learners acquire a sight word vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 62(1), 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hernandez, D. J. (2011). Double jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. Baltimore: Annie E Casey Foundation. http://www.aecf.org.Google Scholar
  22. Heystedt, D. (2017). Personal Communication. 1 December 2017.Google Scholar
  23. Hoadley, U. (2012). What do we know about teaching and learning in South African primary schools? Education as Change, 16(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2012.745725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Howie, S., Venter, E., Van Staden, S., Zimmerman, L., Long, C., Du Toit, C., Scherman, V., & Archer, E. (2008). Progress in International Reading Literacy Study 2006. University of Pretoria: Centre for Evaluation and Assessment.Google Scholar
  26. Howie, S. J., Mokoena, G., Dowse, C., & Zimmerman, L. (2012). PIRLS 2011: Progress in international reading literacy study 2011: South African children’s reading literacy achievement. Centre for Evaluation and Assessment (CEA), University of Pretoria.Google Scholar
  27. Howie, S., Van Staden, S., Tshele, M., Dowse, C., & Zimmerman, L. (2017). Progress in international reading literacy study 2016. South African children’s reading literacy achievement. Summary Report. Centre for Evaluation and Assessment, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  28. ITERP. (2014). An examination of aspects of initial teacher education curricula at five higher education institutions. Initial Teacher Education Research Project. Johannesburg: JET Education Services.Google Scholar
  29. Kaminski, R. A., & Good III, R. H. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25(22), 215–227.Google Scholar
  30. Lee, J. (2011). Size matters: Early vocabulary as a predictor of language and literacy competence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(1), 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lesnick, J., Goerge, R., Smithgall, C., & Gwynne, J. (2010). Reading on grade level in third grade: How is it related to high school performance and college enrollment (Vol. 1, p. 12). Chicago: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  32. Lipka, O., & Siegel, L. S. (2007). The development of reading skills in children with english as a second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(2), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430709336555 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malda, M., Nel, C., & van de Vijver, F. J. (2014). The road to reading for South African learners: The role of orthographic depth. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2008). Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. Developmental Science, 11(3), F9–F16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mouton, J. (2017). Evaluation of Zenex literacy project. Commissioned by the Zenex Foundation.Google Scholar
  36. Mtsatse, N. (2017). Exploring differential item functioning on reading achievement between English and isiXhosa. Unpublished MA dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  37. Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Kennedy, A. M., Trong, K. L., & Sainsbury, M. (2009). PIRLS 2011 assessment framework. International association for the evaluation of educational achievement. ERIC.Google Scholar
  38. Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (2015). PIRLS 2016 assessment framework international association for the evaluation of educational achievement (2nd ed.). Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.Google Scholar
  39. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. T. (2012). PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.Google Scholar
  40. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2017). PIRLS 2016: International results in reading. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
  41. Muter, V., & Diethelm, K. (2001). The contribution of phonological skills and letter knowledge to early reading development in a multilingual population. Language Learning, 51(2), 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  43. NEEDU. (2013). NEEDU National Report 2012: The state of literacy teaching and learning in the foundation phase. National education and evaluation development unit. Department of Basic Education, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  44. Pikulski, J. J., & Templeton, S. (2004). Teaching and developing vocabulary: Key to long-term reading success. In Current research in reading/language arts (pp. 1–12). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. http://www.eduplace.com.Google Scholar
  45. Pinker, S. (1997). Forward. In D. McGuinness (Ed.), Why our children can’t read, and what we can do about it: A scientific revolution in reading. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  46. Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  47. Pretorius, E. (2019). Getting it right from the start: Some cautionary notes for early reading instruction in African languages. In N Spaull & JP Comings (Eds.), Improving Early Literacy Outcomes: Curriculum, Teaching and Assessment (pp.63–80). Leiden: IBE/BRIL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004402379_005 Google Scholar
  48. Pretorius, E. J., & Spaull, N. (2016). Exploring relationships between oral reading fluency and reading comprehension amongst English second language readers in South Africa. Reading and Writing, 29(7), 1449–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Probert, T. (2016). A comparative study of syllables and morphemes as literacy processing units in word recognition: IsiXhosa and Setswana. Unpublished MA dissertation, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.Google Scholar
  50. Rees, S. (2016). Morphological awareness in readers of isiXhosa. Unpublished MA dissertation, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.Google Scholar
  51. Reeves, C., Heugh, K., Prinsloo, C. H., Macdonald, C., Netshitangani, T., Alidou H, Diedericks, G., & Herbst, D. (2008). Evaluation of literacy teaching in primary schools of Limpopo province. HSRC http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/4984
  52. Ross, K. N., Dolata, S., Ikeda, M., Zuze, L., & Murimba, S. (2005). The conduct of the SACMEQ II project in Kenya. Harare: Southern and Eastern African Consortium for Monitoring Education Quality.Google Scholar
  53. Rosén, M. (2010). On the degree of comparability in trend studies as a function of differences in age and schooling. Paper presented at the IEA IRC, Sweden. Retrieved from http://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/irc/IRC2010_Rosen_Strietholt Google Scholar
  54. Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis) abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. Neuman, D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  55. Seidenberg, M. (2017). Language at the speed of sight: How we read, why so many can’t, and what can be done about it. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  56. Sénéchal, M., Ouellette, G., & Rodney, D. (2006). The misunderstood giant: On the predictive role of early vocabulary to future reading. Handbook of Early Literacy Research, 2, 173–182.Google Scholar
  57. Shalem, Y. (2003). Do we have a theory of change? Calling change models to account. Perspectives in Education, 21(1), 29–49.Google Scholar
  58. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  59. Spaull, N. (2013). Poverty & privilege: Primary school inequality in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(5), 436–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Spaull, N. (2015). Accountability and capacity in South African education. Education as Change, 19(3), 113–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2015.1056199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Spaull, N. (2016a). Excessive class sizes in the foundation phase. Policy Brief Research on Socioeconomic Policy (RESEP)(Online) Available: www.resep.sun.ac.za
  62. Spaull, N., Pretorius, E. J., & Mohohlwane, N. (2018). Investigating the comprehension iceberg: Developing empirical benchmarks for early grade reading in agglutinating African languages. Stellenbosch University. RESEP working paper (Series no. WP01/2018). Available: www.resep.sun.ac.za.
  63. Staehr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stahl, K., & Stahl, S. (2012). Young word wizards! Fostering vocabulary development in preschool and primary education. In E. J. Kameenui & J. F. Baumann (Eds.), Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice (pp. 72–92). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  65. Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  66. Taylor, N. (1989). Falling at the first hurdle: Initial encounters with the formal system of African education in South Africa. University of the Witwatersrand, Education Policy Unit.Google Scholar
  67. Taylor, N., & Vinjevold, P. (1999). Getting learning right: Report of the president’s education initiative research project. Braamfontein: Joint Education TrustGoogle Scholar
  68. Taylor, S. (2019). How can learning inequalities be reduced? Lessons learnt from experimental research in South Africa. In N. Spaull & J. Jansen (Eds.), South African schooling: The enigma of inequality. New York: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18811-5_1.Google Scholar
  69. Taylor, N. (2019). Inequalities in teacher knowledge in South Africa. In N. Spaull & J. Jansen (Eds.), South African schooling: The enigma of inequality. New York: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18811-5_1 Google Scholar
  70. Tunmer, W. E., Chapman, J. W., & Prochnow, J. E. (2006). Literate cultural capital at school entry predicts later reading. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 41(2), 183.Google Scholar
  71. Tunmer, W. E., Chapman, J. W., Greaney, K. T., Prochnow, J. E., & Arrow, A. W. (2013). Why the New Zealand national literacy strategy has failed and what can be done about it: Evidence from the progress in international reading literacy study (PIRLS) 2011 and reading recovery monitoring reports. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 18(2), 139–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. van der Berg, S., Burger, C., Burger, R., de Vos, M., du Rand, G., Gustafsson, M., Moses, E., Shepherd, D. L., Spaull, N., Taylor, S., van Broekhuizen, H., & von Fintel, D. (2011). Low quality education as a poverty trap. Research Report for the PSPPD project for presidency. ID 2973766, University of Stellenbosch, Department of Economics, Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
  73. Vasilyeva, M., & Waterfall, H. (2011). Variability in language development: Relation to socioeconomic status and environmental input. Handbook of Early Literacy Research, 3, 36–48.Google Scholar
  74. Vellutino, F. R. (1991). Introduction to three studies on reading acquisition: Convergent findings on theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69(3), 848–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wills, G. (2016). An economic perspective on school leadership and teachers’ unions in South Africa. Thesis, Stellenbosch University.Google Scholar
  77. Wilsenach, C. (2015). Receptive vocabulary and early literacy skills in emergent bilingual Northern Sotho-English children. Reading & Writing-Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa, 6(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  78. Wolf, M. (2008). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain (reprint edition ed.). New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsStellenbosch UniversityCape TownSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Linguistics and Modern LanguagesUnisa,PretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations