Advertisement

Eastern Experience of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy

  • Palanisamy Senthilnathan
  • S. Srivatsan Gurumurthy
  • C. Palanivelu
Chapter

Abstract

Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) has gained popularity in recent times and is now increasingly performed with several institutional series and comparative studies being reported. MIPD appears to provide similar perioperative and oncologic outcomes in select patients, when performed at experienced, high-volume centers. Improved training opportunities, registry participation, and prospective evaluation are needed for larger penetrance of this technique among pancreatic surgeons across the globe.

Keywords

Pancreaticoduodenectomy Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy Pancreatic cancer Whipple’s procedure 

Supplementary material

Video 11.1

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (MP4 269871 kb)

Video 11.2

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy-pancreaticojejunal anastomosis by modified Blumgart technique (MP4 369691 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Song KB, Kim SC, Hwang DW, et al. Matched case-control analysis comparing laparoscopic and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with periampullary tumors. Ann Surg. 2015;262(1):146–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stauffer JA, Coppola A, Villacreses D, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: long-term results at a single institution. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(5):2233–41.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boggi U, Amorese G, Vistoli F, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc. 2014;15:15.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liao CH, Wu YT, Liu YY, et al. Systemic review of the feasibility and advantage of minimally invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 2016;40(5):1218–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Delitto D, Luckhurst CM, Black BS, et al. Oncologic and perioperative outcomes following selective application of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary malignancies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(7):1343–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kendrick ML, Cusati D. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145(1):19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kooby DA, Chu CK. Laparoscopic management of pancreatic malignancies. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90(2):427–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zureikat AH, Breaux JA, Steel JL, et al. Can laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy be safely implemented? J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(7):1151–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the accordion severity grading system. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(6):810–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Correa-Gallego C, Dinkelspiel HE, Sulimanoff I, et al. Minimally-invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(1):129–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vollmer CM, Asbun HJ, Barkun J, et al. Proceedings of the first international state-of-the-art conference on minimally-invasive pancreatic resection (MIPR). HPB. 2017;8(17):015.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Palanivelu C, Takaori K, Abu Hilal M, et al. International summit on laparoscopic pancreatic resection (ISLPR) “Coimbatore summit statements”. Surg Oncol. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2017.12.001. pii: S0960-7404(17)30282-7. [Epub ahead of print].
  13. 13.
    Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 1994;8(5):408–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(2):222–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, et al. Evolution in techniques of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a decade long experience from a tertiary center. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(6):731–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Senthilnathan P, Chinnusamy P, Ramanujam A, et al. Comparison of pathological radicality between open and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in a tertiary Centre. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2015;6(1):20–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Senthilnathan P, Srivatsan Gurumurthy S, Gul SI, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary cancer-experience of 130 cases from a tertiary-care center in South India. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25(4):295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Sabnis SC, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours. Br J Surg. 2017;104(11):1443–50.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10662.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Palanisamy Senthilnathan
    • 1
  • S. Srivatsan Gurumurthy
    • 1
  • C. Palanivelu
    • 1
  1. 1.Gem Hospital and Research CentreCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations