Skip to main content

Perioperative Management: Surgical Site Infection Prevention, DVT Prophylaxis, and Blood Loss Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgery of the Cranio-Vertebral Junction

Abstract

The success of a spine surgical procedure relies on a multidisciplinary teamwork with the need to follow specific guidelines. Antibiotic and deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism prophylaxis is a crucial part of the surgical strategy. The infringement of guidelines may lead to major complications. Furthermore, management of blood loss during the surgical procedure is fundamental.

There is grade B evidence that a single preoperative dose of antibiotic may decrease infection rates in patients undergoing simple spine surgical procedures.

Deep vein thrombosis and subsequent pulmonary embolus can occur following spinal surgery, which leads to increased morbidity and mortality. Prevention by using compression stockings, mechanical devices, or chemoprophylaxis medication is recommended. Objective diagnostic methods, such as venography or Doppler ultrasounds, should be used to confirm a suspected DVT in postoperative spine patients.

The presence of a well-developed perivertebral venous plexus at the craniovertebral junction can expose surgeons to troublesome intraoperative bleeding. Extensive blood loss may rarely lead to greater transfusion needs, hemodynamic instability, and devastating neurological damage because of the vicinity of major and highly fragile neurological structures such as the spinal cord. Use of intraoperative and postoperative strategies may be able to reduce excessive bleeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2013;14(1):73–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Broex ECJ, van Asselt ADI, Bruggeman CA, van Tiel FH. Surgical site infections: how high are the costs? J Hosp Infect. 2009;72(3):193–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Uçkay I, Harbarth S, Peter R, Lew D, Hoffmeyer P, Pittet D. Preventing surgical site infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010;8(6):657–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(8):784–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20(4):250–78; quiz 279-280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Widmer AF, Rotter M, Voss A, Nthumba P, Allegranzi B, Boyce J, et al. Surgical hand preparation: state-of-the-art. J Hosp Infect. 2010;74(2):112–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McDonald M, Grabsch E, Marshall C, Forbes A. Single- versus multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Surg. 1998;68(6):388–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Allegranzi B, Zayed B, Bischoff P, Kubilay NZ, de Jonge S, de Vries F, et al. New WHO recommendations on intraoperative and postoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(12):e288–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zelenitsky SA, Ariano RE, Harding GKM, Silverman RE. Antibiotic pharmacodynamics in surgical prophylaxis: an association between intraoperative antibiotic concentrations and efficacy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(9):3026–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Weber WP, Mujagic E, Zwahlen M, Bundi M, Hoffmann H, Soysal SD, et al. Timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(6):605–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Swoboda SM, Merz C, Kostuik J, Trentler B, Lipsett PA. Does intraoperative blood loss affect antibiotic serum and tissue concentrations? Arch Surg. 1996;131(11):1165–71; discussion 1171–1172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alexander JW, Fischer JE, Boyajian M, Palmquist J, Morris MJ. The influence of hair-removal methods on wound infections. Arch Surg. 1983;118(3):347–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Manniën J, Wille JC, Snoeren RLMM, van den Hof S. Impact of postdischarge surveillance on surgical site infection rates for several surgical procedures: results from the nosocomial surveillance network in The Netherlands. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27(8):809–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas S, Agarwal M, Mehta G. Intraoperative glove perforation—single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination. Postgrad Med J. 2001;77(909):458–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hovaguimian F, Lysakowski C, Elia N, Tramèr MR. Effect of intraoperative high inspired oxygen fraction on surgical site infection, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pulmonary function: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(2):303–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lübbeke A, Hovaguimian F, Wickboldt N, Barea C, Clergue F, Hoffmeyer P, et al. Effectiveness of the surgical safety checklist in a high standard care environment. Med Care. 2013;51(5):425–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Piper K, Algattas H, DeAndrea-Lazarus IA, Kimmell KT, Li YM, Walter KA, et al. Risk factors associated with venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26(1):90–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oda T, Fuji T, Kato Y, Fujita S, Kanemitsu N. Deep venous thrombosis after posterior spinal surgery. Spine. 2000;25(22):2962–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Galanaud J-P, Sevestre-Pietri M-A, Bosson J-L, Laroche J-P, Righini M, Brisot D, et al. Comparative study on risk factors and early outcome of symptomatic distal versus proximal deep vein thrombosis: results from the OPTIMEV study. Thromb Haemost. 2009;102(3):493–500.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Galanaud JP, Quenet S, Rivron-Guillot K, Quere I, Sanchez Muñoz-Torrero JF, Tolosa C, et al. Comparison of the clinical history of symptomatic isolated distal deep-vein thrombosis vs. proximal deep vein thrombosis in 11 086 patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7(12):2028–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hirsh J, Hull RD, Raskob GE. Clinical features and diagnosis of venous thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;8(6 Suppl B):114B–27B.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Browse NL. The painful deep-vein syndrome. Lancet. 1970;1(7659):1251–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, Guy F, Mitchell M, Gray L, et al. Application of a diagnostic clinical model for the management of hospitalized patients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 1999;81(4):493–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kearon C, Julian JA, Newman TE, Ginsberg JS. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. McMaster diagnostic imaging practice guidelines initiative. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128(8):663–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fraser DGW, Moody AR, Morgan PS, Martel AL, Davidson I. Diagnosis of lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: a prospective blinded study of magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(2):89–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Carpenter JP, Holland GA, Baum RA, Owen RS, Carpenter JT, Cope C. Magnetic resonance venography for the detection of deep venous thrombosis: comparison with contrast venography and duplex Doppler ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg. 1993;18(5):734–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Moody AR, Pollock JG, O’Connor AR, Bagnall M. Lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: direct MR imaging of the thrombus. Radiology. 1998;209(2):349–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stein PD, Beemath A, Matta F, Weg JG, Yusen RD, Hales CA, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with acute pulmonary embolism: data from PIOPED II. Am J Med. 2007;120(10):871–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Raczeck P, Minko P, Graeber S, Fries P, Seidel R, Buecker A, et al. Influence of respiratory position on contrast attenuation in pulmonary CT angiography: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(3):481–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wittram C, Waltman AC, Shepard J-AO, Halpern E, Goodman LR. Discordance between CT and angiography in the PIOPED II study. Radiology. 2007;244(3):883–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hartman JT, Pugh JL, Smith RD, Robertson WW, Yost RP, Janssen HF. Cyclic sequential compression of the lower limb in prevention of deep venous thrombosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(7):1059–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rokito SE, Schwartz MC, Neuwirth MG. Deep vein thrombosis after major reconstructive spinal surgery. Spine. 1996;21(7):853–8.. discussion 859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bono CM, Watters WC, Heggeness MH, Resnick DK, Shaffer WO, Baisden J, et al. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the use of antithrombotic therapies in spine surgery. Spine J. 2009;9(12):1046–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sebastian AS, Currier BL, Kakar S, Nguyen EC, Wagie AE, Habermann ES, et al. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism following thoracolumbar surgery: analysis of 43,777 patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005 to 2012. Glob Spine J. 2016;6(8):738–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kakkar VV, Corrigan TP, Fossard DP, Sutherland I, Thirwell J. Prevention of fatal postoperative pulmonary embolism by low doses of heparin. Reappraisal of results of international multicentre trial. Lancet. 1977;1(8011):567–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim S-M, Moon Y-W, Lim S-J, Kim D-W, Park Y-S. Effect of oral factor Xa inhibitor and low-molecular-weight heparin on surgical complications following total hip arthroplasty. Thromb Haemost. 2016;115(3):600–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Clevenger B, Richards T. Pre-operative anaemia. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(Suppl 1):20–8, e6–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Musallam KM, Tamim HM, Richards T, Spahn DR, Rosendaal FR, Habbal A, et al. Preoperative anaemia and postoperative outcomes in non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2011;378(9800):1396–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kozek-Langenecker SA, Ahmed AB, Afshari A, Albaladejo P, Aldecoa C, Barauskas G, et al. Management of severe perioperative bleeding: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology: first update 2016. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34(6):332–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumar A. Perioperative management of anemia: limits of blood transfusion and alternatives to it. Cleve Clin J Med. 2009;76(Suppl 4):S112–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Laupacis A, Fergusson D. Erythropoietin to minimize perioperative blood transfusion: a systematic review of randomized trials. The International Study of Peri-operative Transfusion (ISPOT) Investigators. Transfus Med Oxf Engl. 1998;8(4):309–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Stowell CP, Jones SC, Enny C, Langholff W, Leitz G. An open-label, randomized, parallel-group study of perioperative epoetin alfa versus standard of care for blood conservation in major elective spinal surgery: safety analysis. Spine. 2009;34(23):2479–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Henry DA, Carless PA, Moxey AJ, O’Connell D, Forgie MA, Wells PS, et al. Pre-operative autologous donation for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(2):CD003602.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Burger W, Chemnitius J-M, Kneissl GD, Rücker G. Low-dose aspirin for secondary cardiovascular prevention—cardiovascular risks after its perioperative withdrawal versus bleeding risks with its continuation—review and meta-analysis. J Intern Med. 2005;257(5):399–414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Downey DM, Monson B, Butler KL, Fortuna GR, Saxe JM, Dolan JP, et al. Does platelet administration affect mortality in elderly head-injured patients taking antiplatelet medications? Am Surg. 2009;75(11):1100–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Washington CW, Schuerer DJE, Grubb RL. Platelet transfusion: an unnecessary risk for mild traumatic brain injury patients on antiplatelet therapy. J Trauma. 2011;71(2):358–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pollack CV, Reilly PA, Bernstein R, Dubiel R, Eikelboom J, Glund S, et al. Design and rationale for RE-VERSE AD: a phase 3 study of idarucizumab, a specific reversal agent for dabigatran. Thromb Haemost. 2015;114(1):198–205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Monk TG. Acute normovolemic hemodilution. Anesthesiol Clin N Am. 2005;23(2):271–81.. vi

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Parasa SK, Bidkar PU, Parida S. Acute normovolemic hemodilution to avoid blood transfusion during intracranial aneurysm surgery in a patient with atypical antibodies. Anesth Essays Res. 2016;10(1):136–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Bickell WH, Wall MJ, Pepe PE, Martin RR, Ginger VF, Allen MK, et al. Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(17):1105–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zarychanski R, Abou-Setta AM, Turgeon AF, Houston BL, McIntyre L, Marshall JC, et al. Association of hydroxyethyl starch administration with mortality and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients requiring volume resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013;309(7):678–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Henry DA, Carless PA, Moxey AJ, O’Connell D, Stokes BJ, Fergusson DA, et al. Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(1):CD001886.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Winter SF, Santaguida C, Wong J, Fehlings MG. Systemic and topical use of tranexamic acid in spinal surgery: a systematic review. Glob Spine J. 2016;6(3):284–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Gazzeri R, De Bonis C, Galarza M. Use of a thrombin-gelatin hemostatic matrix (Surgiflo) in spinal surgery. Surg Technol Int. 2014;25:280–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Schonauer C, Tessitore E, Barbagallo G, Albanese V, Moraci A. The use of local agents: bone wax, gelatin, collagen, oxidized cellulose. Eur Spine J. 2004;13(Suppl 1):S89–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Jenkins HP, Senz EH. Present status of gelatin sponge for the control of hemorrhage; with experimental data on its use for wounds of the great vessels and the heart. JAMA. 1946;132(11):614–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Tessitore E, Schatlo B, Schaller C, Schonauer C. Fibrillary structure is key for hemostasis: a similar effect of collagen fleece and oxidized cellulose on experimental hemorrhagic brain injury. J Neurol Surg Part Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2012;73(2):89–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Scher KS, Coil JA. Effects of oxidized cellulose and microfibrillar collagen on infection. Surgery. 1982;91(3):301–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Agger P, Langhoff J, Smerup MH, Hasenkam JM. Comparison between TachoComb and TachoSil for surgical hemostasis in arterial bleeding: an animal experimental study. J Trauma. 2010;68(4):838–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Aebi M, Weiskopf R. Research and evidence about blood sparing in spine surgery. Eur Spine J. 2004;13(Suppl 1):S1–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Jackson MR. Fibrin sealants in surgical practice: an overview. Am J Surg. 2001;182(2 Suppl):1S–7S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Renkens KL, Payner TD, Leipzig TJ, Feuer H, Morone MA, Koers JM, et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating a new hemostatic agent for spinal surgery. Spine. 2001;26(15):1645–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Landi A, Gregori F, Marotta N, Efficacy DR. Security, and manageability of Gelified hemostatic matrix in bleeding control during thoracic and lumbar spine surgery: FloSeal versus Surgiflo. J Neurol Surg Part Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2016;77(2):139–43.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Arnautović KI, al-Mefty O, Pait TG, Krisht AF, Husain MM. The suboccipital cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg. 1997;86(2):252–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. San Millán Ruíz D, Gailloud P, Rüfenacht DA, Delavelle J, Henry F, Fasel JHD. The craniocervical venous system in relation to cerebral venous drainage. Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23(9):1500–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Wada K, Tamaki R, Yui M, Numaguchi D, Murata Y. C1 lateral mass screw insertion caudally from C2 nerve root—an alternate method for insertion of C1 screws: a technical note and preliminary clinical results. J Orthop Sci. 2017;22(2):213–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Yeom JS, Kafle D, Nguyen NQ, Noh W, Park K-W, Chang B-S, et al. Routine insertion of the lateral mass screw via the posterior arch for C1 fixation: feasibility and related complications. Spine J. 2012;12(6):476–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Tessitore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Molliqaj, G., Robin, M., Czarnetzki, C., Daly, MJ., Agostinho, A., Tessitore, E. (2020). Perioperative Management: Surgical Site Infection Prevention, DVT Prophylaxis, and Blood Loss Management. In: Tessitore, E., Dehdashti, A., Schonauer, C., Thomé, C. (eds) Surgery of the Cranio-Vertebral Junction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18700-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18700-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18699-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18700-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics