Skip to main content

Grape Rootstock Breeding and Their Performance Based on the Wolpert Trials in California

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Grape Genome

Abstract

Pest and disease pressures have traditionally driven the use of grapevine rootstocks. However, with competing demands on limited water resources and changing climate conditions, the water available for agriculture will likely continue to diminish. This inevitability has resulted in an increased interest in grape rootstock effects on scion growth, specifically yield components, as a function of parentage and in terms of drought tolerance. It has also spurred efforts to breed new rootstocks with combined pest, disease, and abiotic stress resistance. Field studies examining rootstock effect on scion growth and development have been inconsistent due to complications associated with varying soil types and weather factors unique to each site. Other factors tend to vary from site to site including trellising systems, scion cultivar selection and management practices, each of which also has a role in determining vine phenology. Due to these issues, rootstock trial data is often presented on a site-by-site basis with the objective of determining if a specific rootstock tends to yield more or less than other rootstocks on a given site. Although inherently limited by the aforementioned challenges, rootstock trails are arguably one of the best methods of providing insight into rootstock performance and scion interactions. The Wolpert rootstock trails in California were one of the more comprehensive efforts to understand and classify rootstock performance as a function of site. General trends in performance were observed as a function of rootstock selection with regard to yield and pruning weights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anamosa PR (1998) Characterization of soil beneath the field evaluation of winegrape rootstocks research trials. Master’s Thesis. University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavaresco L, Fregoni M, Fraschini P (1991) Investigations on iron uptake and reduction by excised roots of different grapevine rootstocks and V. vinifera cultivar. Plant Soil 130:109–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bavaresco L, Fraschini P, Perino A (1993) Effect of the rootstock on the occurrence of lime-induced chlorosis of potted Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Pinot blanc’. Plant Soil 157:305–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavaresco L, Gardiman M, Brancadoro L, Espen L, Failla O, Scienza A, Vezzulli S, Zulini L, Velasco R, Stefanini M, Di Gaspero G, Testolin R (2015) Grapevine breeding in Italy. In: Reynolds A (ed) Grapevine breeding programs for the wine industry. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergqvist J, Dokoozlian N, Ebisuda N (2001) Sunlight exposure and temperature effects on berry growth and composition of Cabernet Sauvignon and Grenache in the central San Joaquin Valley of California. Am J Enol Vitic 52:1–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blank M, Tittmann S, Ghozlen NB, Stoll M (2018) Grapevine rootstocks result in differences in leaf composition (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinot Noir) detected through non-invasive fluorescence sensor technology. Aust J Grape Wine Res 24:327–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bledsoe AM, Kliewer WM, Marois JJ (1988) Effects of timing and severity of leaf removal on yield and fruit composition of Sauvignon blanc grapevines. Am J Enol Vitic 39:49–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brancadoro L, Valenti L, Reina A, Scienza A (1994) Potassium content of grapevine during the vegetative period: the role of rootstock. J Plant Nutr 17:2165–2175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bybordi A (2012) Study effect of salinity on some physiologic and morphologic properties of two grape cultivars. Life Sci J 9:1092–1101

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell C (2005) The Botanist and the Vintner: how wine was saved for the world. Algonquin Books, Chapel Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Champagnol F (1984) Elements of the physiology of the vine and of general viticulture. Saint Gely du Fesc, France, Champagnol F

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen LP (1984) Nutrient level comparisons of leaf petioles and blades in twenty-six grape cultivars over three years (1979 through 1981). Am J Enol Vitic 36:124–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen LP, Dokoozlian NK, Walker MA, Wolpert JA (2003) Rootstock selection. In: Reynolds A (ed) Winegrape varieties of California. ANR Pub 3419. Oakland, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman C, Copetti D, Cipriani G, Hoffmann S, Kozman P, Kovács L, Morgante M, Testolin R, Di Gaspero G (2009) The powdery mildew resistance gene REN1 co-segregates with an NBS-LRR gene cluster in two Central Asian grapevines. BMC Genet 10:89

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Csepregi P, Zilai J (1955) Our vine varieties (Ampelography). Agricultural Publishing House, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalbo MA, Schuck E, Basso C (2011) Influence of rootstock on nutrient content in grape petioles. Rev Bras Frutic 33:941–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gaspero G, Copetti D, Coleman C, Castellarian SD, Eibach R, Kozman P, Lacombe T, Gambetta G, Zvyagin A, Cindrić P, Kovács L, Morgante M, Testolin R (2012) Selective sweep at the Rpv3 locus during grapevine breeding for downy mildew resistance. Theor Appl Genet 124:277–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson Peterson JC, Walker MA (2017) Grapevine rootstock influence on scion development and initiation of senescence. Catalyst 1:48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JT (1894) Report of the Board of State Viticultural Commissioners for 1893-94, p 208

    Google Scholar 

  • Emanuelli F, Lorenzi S, Grzeskowiak L, Catalano V, Stefanini M, Troggio M, Myles S, Martinez-Zapater JM, Zyprian E, Moreira FM, Grando MS (2013) Genetic diversity and population structure assessed by SSR and SNP markers in a large germplasm collection of grape. BMC Plant Biol 13:39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Etourneaud F, Loue A (1986) Petiolar diagnosis of grapevine in relation to the interpretation of soil analysis for potassium and magnesium. In: International symposium on vine physiology. Bordeaux, France, pp 240–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta GA, Manuck CM, Drucker ST, Shaghasi T, Fort K, Matthews MA, Walker MA, McElrone AJ (2012) The relationship between root hydraulics and scion vigour across Vitis rootstocks: what role do root aquaporins play? J Exp Bot 63:6445–6455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Granett J, Goheen AC, Lider LA (1987a) Evaluation of grape rootstocks for resistance to type A and type B grape phylloxera. Am J Enol Vitic 38:298–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Granett J, Goheen AC, Lider LA (1987b) Grape phylloxera in California. Calif Agric 41:10–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant RS, Matthews MA (1996) The influence of phosphorous availability and rootstock on root system characteristics, phosphorus uptake, phosphorus partitioning, and growth efficiency. Am J Enol Vitic 47:403–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman RN, Grimm R, Frank M (1993) The influence of grape rootstocks on the crown gall infection process and on tumor development. Am J Enol Vitic 44:22–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillon JM (1905) General study of the vine: historic vineyards and vintages, anatomy and physiology, soil and climate. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajdu E (2015) Grapevine breeding in Hungary. In: Reynolds A (ed) Grapevine breeding programs for the wine industry. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harris AR (1984) Resistance of some Vitis rootstocks to Xiphinema index. J Nematol 15:405–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller M, Kummer M, Carmo Vasconcelos M (2001) Reproductive growth of grapevines in response to nitrogen supply and rootstock. Aust J Grape Wine Res 7:12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller M, Mills LJ, Harbertson JF (2012) Rootstock effects on deficit-irrigated winegrapes in a dry climate: vigor, yield formation, and fruit ripening. Am J Enol Vitic 63:29–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koblet W, Candolfi-Vasconcelos CM, Zweifel W, Howell GS (1994) Influence of leaf removal, rootstock, and training system on yield and fruit composition of Pinot noir grapevines. Am J Enol Vitic 45:181–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Koblet W, Keller M (1996) Effects of training system, canopy management practices, crop load and rootstock on grapevine photosynthesis. Acta Hortic 427:133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert JJ, Anderson MM, Wolpert JA (2008) Vineyard nutrient needs vary with rootstocks and soils. Calif Agric 62:202–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Guo Z, Jia N, Yuan J, Han B, Yin Y, Sun Y, Liu C, Zhao S (2019) Evaluation of eight rootstocks on the growth and berry quality of ‘Marselan’ grapevines. Sci Hortic 248:58–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lider LA (1958) Phylloxera-resistant grape rootstocks for the coastal valleys of California. Hilgardia 27:287–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lider LA, Kasimatis AN, Kliewer WM (1973) Effect of pruning severity and rootstock on growth and yield of two grafted, cane-pruned wine grape cultivars. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 98:8–12

    Google Scholar 

  • May P, Clingeleffer PR, Brien CJ (1976) Sultana (Vitis vinifera L.) canes and their exposure to light. Vitis 14:278–288

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy MG, Cirami RM, Furkaliev DJ (1997) Rootstock response of Shiraz (Vitis vinifera) grapevines to dry and drip-irrigated conditions. Aust J Grape Wine Res 3:95–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morano L, Kliewer WM (1994) Root distribution of three grapevine rootstocks grafted to Cabernet Sauvignon grown on a very gravelly clay loam soil in Oakville, California. Am J Enol Vitic 45:345–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Morlet R, Jacquet A (1993) The soil effects on the grapevine root system in several vineyards of the Loire valley (France). Vitis 32:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilsen GH, Neilsen D, Bowen P, Bogdanoff C, Usher K (2010) Effect of timing, rate, and form of N fertilization on nutrition, vigor, yield, and berry yeast-assimilable N of grape. Am J Enol Vitic 61:327–336

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson CC, Kennedy JA, Zhang Y, Kurtural SK (2016) Applied water and rootstock affect productivity and anthocyanin composition of Zinfandel in Central California. Am J Enol Vitic 67:18–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozden M, Vardin H, Simsek M, Karaasian M (2010) Effects of rootstocks and irrigation levels on grape quality of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz. Afr J Biotechnol 9:3801–3807

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paranychianakis NV, Aggelides S, Angelakis AN (2004) Influence of rootstock, irrigation level and recycled water on growth and yield of Sultanina grapevines. Agric Water Manag 69:13–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pongrácz DP (1983) Rootstocks for grape-vines. David Philip, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramming DW (2010) Greenhouse screening of grape rootstock populations to determine inheritance of resistance to phylloxera. Am J Enol Vitic 61:234–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds AG (2015) Grapevine breeding in France—a historical perspective. In: Reynolds A (ed) Grapevine breeding programs for the wine industry. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues da Silva MJ, Maia Paiva AP, Pimentel A Jr, Pereira Contreras Sánchez CA, Callili D, Moura MF, Leonel S, Tecchio MA (2018) Yield performance of new juice grape varieties grafted onto different rootstocks under tropical conditions. Sci Hortic 241:194–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogiers SY, Clarke SJ (2013) Vegetative growth and cluster development in Shiraz grapevines subjected to partial root-zone cooling. AoB Plants. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plt036

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Romero P, Batía P, Navarro JM (2018) Selecting rootstocks to improve vine performance and vineyard sustainability in deficit irrigated Monastrell grapes under semiarid conditions. Agric Water Manag 209:73–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruehl E, Schmid J, Eibach R, Töpfer R (2015) Grapevine breeding programmes in Germany. In: Reynolds A (ed) Grapevine breeding programs for the wine industry. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sabir A, Sahin Z (2018) The response of soilless grown ‘Michele Palieri’ (Vitis vinifera L.) grapevine cultivar to deficit irrigation under the effects of different rootstocks. Erwerbs-Obstau 60:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez LA, Dokoozlian NK (2005) Bud microclimate and fruitfulness in Vitis vinifera L. Am J Enol Vitic 56:319–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Scienza A, Failla O, Romano F (1986) Investigations on the variety-specific uptake of minerals by grapevines. Vitis 25:160–168

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Division Staff (1993) Soil Survey Manual. USDA Handbook No. 18, Issued October 1993. US GPO, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanepoel JJ, Southey JM (1989) The influence of rootstock on the rooting pattern of the grapevine. S Afr J Enol Vitic 10:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Venuti S, Copetti D, Foria S, Falginella L, Hoffmann S, Bellin D, Cindric P, Kozma P, Scalabrin S, Morgante M, Testolin R, Di Gaspero G (2013) Historical introgression of the downy mildew resistance gene Rpv12 from the Asian species Vitis amurensis into grapevine varieties. PLoS ONE 8:e61228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Virgona JM, Smith JP, Holzapfel BP (2003) Scions influence apparent transpiration efficiency of Vitis vinifera (cv. Shiraz) rather than rootstocks. Aust J Grape Wine Res 9:183–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrsic S, Pulko B, Kocsis L (2015) Factor influencing grafting success and compatibility of grape rootstocks. Sci Hortic 181:168–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker MA, Wolpert JA, Weber E (1994) Viticultural characteristics of VR hybrid rootstocks in a vineyard site infected with grapevine fanleaf virus. Vitis 33:19–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams LE (2010) Interaction of rootstock and applied water amounts at various fractions of estimated evapotranspiration (ETc) on productivity of Cabernet Sauvignon. Aust J Grape Wine Res 16:434–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf TK, Pool RM (1988) Effects of rootstock and nitrogen fertilization on the growth and yield of Chardonnay grapevines in New York. Am J Enol Vitic 39:29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert JA, Smart DR, Anderson M (2005) Lower petiole potassium concentration at bloom in rootstocks with Vitis berlandieri genetic backgrounds. Am J Enol Vitic 56:163–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim K, Yagci A, Sucu S, Tunc S (2018) Responses of grapevine rootstocks to drought through altered root system architecture and root transcriptomic regulations. Plant Phys Biochem 127:256–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Andrew Walker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dodson Peterson, J.C. et al. (2019). Grape Rootstock Breeding and Their Performance Based on the Wolpert Trials in California. In: Cantu, D., Walker, M. (eds) The Grape Genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18601-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics