• Roberto Frega


The introduction consists of 15 pages and presents the central ideas of the book, explaining in particular why a (1) social, (2) pragmatic, and (3) wide view of democracy is required today, what are its advantaged and what it enables to achieve. These three features are examined in turn to explain the content of the proposed approach.


Wide view of democracy Social democracy Pragmatism Critical theory Democratic project 


  1. Abensour, M. (2011). Democracy Against the State: Marx and the Machiavellian Movement. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  2. Achen, C. and L. Bartels (2016). Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayat, A. (1997). Street politics: Poor people’s movements in Iran. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bayat, A. (2010). Life as politics: How ordinary people change the Middle East. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bluhdorn, I. (2013). Simulative Demokratie: neue Politik nach der postdemokratischen Wende. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  6. Brennan, J. (2016). Against democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Castel, R. (1995). Les métamorphoses de la question sociale: une chronique du salariat. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  9. Crouch, C. (2004). Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1888). The ethics of democracy. The Early Works, vol. 1, pp. 227–250. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and its Problems. The Later Works, 1925–1953, vol. 2. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Eley, G. (2002). Forging democracy: The history of the left in Europe, 1850–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Frega, R. (2020). Solidarity as social involvement. Moral Philosophy and Politics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  14. Galston, W. A. (2010). Realism in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory 9(4), 385–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green, J. E. (2016). The Shadow of Unfairness: A Plebeian Theory of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grollios, V. (2011). Marx and Engels’ critique of democracy: The materialist character of their concept of autonomy. Critique 39(1), 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 1. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirst, P. (1993). Associative democracy: New forms of economic and social governance. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  20. Honneth, A. (2014). Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. Cambridge: Polity.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaeggi, R. (2014). Kritik von Lebensformen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  22. Jörke, D. (2011). Kritik demokratischer Praxis. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  24. Larmore, C. (1999). The moral basis of political liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy, 599–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lavelle, A. (2008). The death of social democracy: Political consequences in the 21st century. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  26. Lefort, C. (1986). Essais sur le politique. Paris: Éd. du Seuil.Google Scholar
  27. Levitsky, S. and D. Ziblatt (2018). How democracies die. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  28. MacGilvray, E. (2000). Five myths about pragmatism, or, against a second pragmatic acquiescence. Political Theory 28(4), 480–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mansbridge, J. (1983). Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. March, J. and J. Olsen (2010). Rediscovering institutions. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  31. Merkel, W. (2010). Are dictatorships returning? Revisiting the ‘democratic rollback’ hypothesis. Contemporary Politics 16(1), 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyer, T. (2007). The theory of social democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  33. Moschonas, G. (2002). In the name of social democracy: The great transformation, 1945 to the present. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  34. Mounk, Y. (2018). The People vs. Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perry, M. J. (2010). The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation: Economic and political origins of our time. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.Google Scholar
  39. Przeworski, A. (2010). Democracy and the limits of self-government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Sassoon, D. (2010). One Hundred Years of Socialism. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  43. Saward, M. (2010). The representative claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schäfer, A. (2010). Die folgen sozialer ungleicheit für die demokratie in westeuropa. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 4(1), 131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schubert, H.-J. (2011). Jenseits von gemeinschaft and gesellschaft: Prozesse der differenzierung und individuierung an sicht der chicago school of sociology. In B. e. a. Hollstein (Ed.), Handlung und Erfahrung, pp. 131–149. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  46. Scott, J. (1979). The Moral Economy of the Peasant. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Serrano Zamora, J. (2017a). Articulating a sense of powers. An expressivist reading of John Dewey’s theory of social movements. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 53(1).Google Scholar
  49. Shapiro, I. (1999). Democratic justice. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Stikkers, K. and K. Skowroński (Eds.) (2018). Philosophy in the Time of Economic Crisis: Pragmatism and Economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Streeck, W. (2014). Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  52. Thompson, D. (1984). The Chartists. Popular Politics in the Industrial Revolution. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  53. Urbinati, N. (2014). Democracy Disfigured. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Frega
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre Marc BlochBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations