Advertisement

The Position in the Family Relations System as a Predictor of Young Men Extremist Attitudes

  • S. M. SityaevaEmail author
  • S. V. Yaremtchuk
  • V. V. Tarasenko
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 139)

Abstract

Extremist manifestations among young people makes revealing the predictors, which may foresee the possibility of getting them involved in extremist and terroristic groups, important nowadays. The current study examined the predictors of extremist attitudes (fanatical, nationalistic and xenophobic ones) and of authoritarianism of young men depending on their position in the family relations system of a parental family. The analyzed sample consisted of 109 young men (from 18 to 30 years old, the average age is 21,8). The following methods have been used: the extremist destructive personality setting method by K.V. Zlokazov, the modified psycho-geometrics questionnaire by S. Dellinger, the method of “Social sociogram” by E.G. Ehjdemiller. The main predictors of the young men’ nationalistic attitudes were singled out: egocentric position in the family relations system and the position of an only child. High importance of a father with distance in relations with him, a limited circle of family contacts and low significance of siblings have been brought out as the predictors of xenophobic attitudes. The major predicators of migrant-phobia and Islamophobia are a limited circle of family contacts and positive emotional attitude to oneself. The authoritarianism predicators include high importance attributed to a mother and the absence of distance in the relations with her combined with emotionally negative attitude to the family in the whole and low self-esteem. The regression analysis used to provide the statistic analysis of the data proves the high explanatory potential of the received patterns.

Keywords

Youth extremism Predictors of extremism Position in the family relations system Nationalism Xenophobia Authoritarianism Migrant-phobia Islamophobia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has been carried out with the financial support of Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, project No. 25.8631.2017/8.9 on the theme of the project “Subjective and objective predictors of youth extremist attitudes”.

References

  1. 1.
    Petrianin, A.V.: Personality of an extremist: criminological aspect. J. Nizhny Novgorod Acad. MIA Russia 20, 104–109 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vekhov, I.V.: Extremism as a subject of sociological research. Izvestia Herzen Univ. J. Humanit. Sci. 111, 284–290 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Odintsova, M.A., Tishchenko, M.V.: The study of latent extremism in the educational environment of colleges. Monit. Public Opin. Econ. Soc. Changes J. 4(122), 141–149 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deyneka, O.S., Dauksha, V.S., Morozova, S.V.: Values as a factor in students attitudes toward extremism. Int. J. Appl. Fundam. Res. 12, 1717–1723 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yaremtchuk, S.V., Sityaeva, S.M.: Age, gender and occupation as predictors of extremist attitudes in early adulthood. Psychol. Res. 11(58) (2018). http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2018v11n58/1557-yaremtchuk58.html. Accessed 15 May 2018
  6. 6.
    Ceobanu, A.M., Xavier, E.: East is West? National feelings and anti-immigrant sentiment in Europe. Soc. Sci. Res. 37(4), 1147–1170 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Quillian, L.: Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. Am. Sociol. Rev. 60(4), 586–611 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arnett, J.: Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am. Psychol. 55, 469–480 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cullaty, B.: The role of parental involvement in the autonomy development of traditional-age college students. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 52, 425–439 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Antonyan, Y.M., Yurasova, E.N.: The extremist and terrorist behavior from the position of profound psychology. Sci. Portal Ministry Inter. Aff. Russia 10, 3–10 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Repetti, R.L., Taylor, S.E., Seeman, T.E.: Risky families: family social environments and the mental and physical health of offspring. Psychol. Bull. 128(2), 330–366 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McKinney, C., Walker, C.S., Kwan, J.W.: Mother–father dyad conflict strategy clusters: implications for emerging adults. J. Interpersonal Violence (2016). http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0886260516683177
  13. 13.
    Nelson, L.J., Padilla-Walker, L.M., Christensen, K.J., Evans, C.A., Carroll, J.S.: Parenting in emerging adulthood: an examination of parenting clusters and correlates. J. Youth Adolesc. 40, 730–743 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Streeck-Fischer, A.: «Proud of violence». Psychoanalytic remarks on adolescence and right extremism. Psyche 46(8), 745–768 (1992)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boehnke, K.: Ist Rechtsextremismus “erblich”? Zur Ähnlichkeit rechtsextremer Verhaltenstendenzen von Studierenden und ihren Eltern. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 29, 340–354 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zlokazov, K.V.: The method of investigation extremist destructive personality settings. Bull. Saint-Petersburg Univ. MIA Russia 1, 173–180 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shmakova, V.A., et al.: Methodology for assessing the formation of a civic identity of a collective entity. Certificate of Registration of know-how No. 2016-01.7. Komsomolsk-on-Amur (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eidemiller, E.G., Yustitsky, V.V.: Psychology and psychotherapy of the family, St. Petersburg (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Popov, N.P.: Authoritarian personality in the United States and Russia: shifts in a quarter century. Human 6, 75–86 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grigoryeva, E.B.: Authoritarian syndrome as a factor of modern Russia political regime. Vestnik of Samara State University 8–1(109), 235–244 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Feldman, S.: Enforcing social conformity: a theory of authoritarianism. Polit. Psychol. 1(24), 41–74 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Druzhinin, V.N.: Psychology of the Family. Piter, St. Petersburg (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    McKinney, C., Kwan, J.W.: Emerging adult perceptions of and preferences for parenting styles and associated psychological outcomes. J. Fam. Issues 9(39), 2491–2504 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D., Sanford, N.: The Authoritarian Personality. Harper, New York (1950)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Curtis, J.M., Cowell, D.R.: Relation of birth order and scores on measures of pathological narcissism. Psychol. Rep. 1(72), 311–315 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Soldatova, G.U., Makarchuk, A.V.: Training on the Prevention of Xenophobia. Genezis, Moscow (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ilyin, Ye.P.: Differential Psychophysiology of a Man and a Woman. Piter, St. Petersburg (2000)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wahl, K.: Development of xenophobia and aggression. Int. J. Appl. Crim. Justice 2(26), 247–256 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boehnke, K., Hagan, J., Hefler, G.: On the development of xenophobia in Germany: the adolescent years. J. Soc. Issues 3(54), 585–602 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Baumeister, R.F., Smart, L., Boden, J.M.: Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: the dark side of high self-esteem. Psychol. Rev. 1(103), 5–33 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Amur State University of Humanities and PedagogyKomsomolsk-na-AmureRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations