Advertisement

Normative Economics of Education Distribution: Equity-Efficiency Trade-off

  • D. V. KislitsynEmail author
  • E. Yu. Popova
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 139)

Abstract

The paper deals with normative economics of education distribution. Traditionally, education is considered under positive economics of externalities, the presence of which leads to underproduction of educational services in comparison with socially optimal amount. However, the normative aspect of education distribution is also important. The distribution of education according to wiliness to pay principle leads to the consolidation of social inequality, therefore significant share of educational services is distributed through non-market mechanisms. The paper is devoted to the analysis of these mechanisms. It is shown that with the non-market distribution of educational services society may be willing to sacrifice some degree of efficiency in maximizing aggregate returns to education gains in exchange for a distribution that is perceived to be more fair; this is known as the ‘equity-efficiency trade-off’. Distribution of educational services on a meritocratic principle, which maximizes the aggregate returns to education, leads more affluent students receive more educational assets.

Keywords

Education distribution Equity-efficiency trade-off Normative economics 

References

  1. 1.
    Acemoglu, D., Angrist, J.D.: How large are human-capital externalities? Evidence from compulsory-schooling laws. In: Bernanke, B., Rogoff, K. (eds.) NBER Macroeconomics Annual, pp. 9–59. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oreopoulos, P., Salvanes, K.G.: Priceless: the nonpecuniary benefits of schooling. J. Econ. Perspect. 25(1), 159–184 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haveman, R.H., Wolfe, B.L.: Schooling and economic well-being: the role of nonmarket effects. J. Hum. Res. 19(3), 377–407 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lochner, L.: Education, work, and crime: a human capital approach. Int. Econ. Rev. 45(3), 811–843 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Becker, G.S.: Human Capital. Columbia University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, New York. w11279 (1964)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schultz, T.W.: Investment in human capital. Am. Econ. Rev. 1(2), 1–17 (1961)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spence, A.M.: Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(3), 355–379 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hirsch, F.: The Social Limits to Growth. Routledge & Kegan, London (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hurley, J.: Welfarism, extra-welfarism and evaluative economic analysis in the health sector. In: Getzen, T.E., Barer, M.L., Stoddart, G.L. (eds.) Health, Health Care and Health Economics: Perspectives on Distribution. Wiley, Chichester (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brouwer, W.B., Culyer, A.J., van Exel, N.J., Rutten, F.F.: Welfarism vs. extra-welfarism. J. Health Econ. 27(2), 325–338 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grisay, A.: Quels indicateurs pour quelle réduction des inégalités scolaires? Revue de la Direction générale de l’organisation des études 9, 3–14 (1984)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F., York, R.: Equality of Educational Opportunity. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. (1966)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Musgrave, R.A.: The Theory of Public Finance. McGraw-Hill, New York (1959)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Card, D.: Chap. 30 - The causal effect of education on earnings. In: Ashenfelter, O.C., Card, D. (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3, pp. 1801–1863. Elsevier (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harmon, C.P., Oosterbeek, H., Walker, I.: The returns to education: microeconomics. J. Econ. Surv. 17(2), 115–155 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ashenfelter, O., Harmon, C., Oosterbeek, H.: A review of estimates of the schooling/earnings relationship, with tests for publication bias. Labour Econ. 6(3), 453–470 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dickson, M., Harmon, C.: Economic returns to education: what we know, what we don’t know, and where we are going—some brief pointers. Econ. Educ. Rev. 30(6), 1118–1122 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prakhov, I., Yudkevich, M.: University admission in Russia: do the wealthier benefit from standardized exams? International J. Educ. Dev. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.08.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bray, M., Kwok, P.: Demand for private supplementary tutoring: conceptual considerations, and socio-economic patterns in Hong Kong. Econ. Educ. Rev. 22(6), 611–620 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baird, L.L.: Relationships between ability, college attendance, and family income. Res. High. Educ. 21(4), 373–395 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dahl, G.B., Lochner, L.: The impact of family income on child achievement. Am. Econ. Rev. 102(5), 1927–1956 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Davis-Kean, P.E.: The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: the indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. J. Fam. 19(2), 294–304 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hill, M.A., O’Neill, J.: Family endowments and the achievement of young children with special reference to the underclass. J. Hum. Res. Univ. Wis. Press 29(4), 1064–1100 (1994)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    White, K.R.: The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychol. Bull. 91(3), 461 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kemerovo State UniversityKemerovoRussia

Personalised recommendations