Advertisement

Trends of Innovative Development of Krasnoyarsk Region

  • K. S. ChernykhEmail author
  • O. N. Vladimirova
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 139)

Abstract

One of the ways to develop the economy is innovation. The purpose of the article is to identify the main trends of innovative development and develop proposals for increasing its effectiveness at the mesolevel. The authors give a characteristic of the current state of innovation activity of the Russian Federation and one of its territory - Krasnoyarsk region. The authors compared the indicators that measure the levels of innovation development both according to international and domestic statistical data. Factors based on the identified trends were identified. Regional analytical researches allowed to justify an optimum composition of the sources and tools of financing innovation. The results of empirical data allowed the authors to reveal disproportions in the structure of the innovation infrastructure. The article gives recommendations on improving of institutional support with regard of the life cycle of innovations.

Keywords

Innovation Innovation activity Innovative development of countries 

References

  1. 1.
    Draft Strategy for Social and Economic Development of the Krasnoyarsk region until 2030. Project of June 23, 2016. Official portal of the Krasnoyarsk regionGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Strategy of innovative development of the Krasnoyarsk region for the period until 2020 “Innovation region - 2020”. Decree of November 24, 2011 No. 218-UG. Legal system “Pravo.ru”Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strategy of innovative development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2020. Government Decree No. 2227-r of 08.12.2011. Reference legal system “ConsultantPlus”Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Strategy of scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of December 1, 2016 N 642. Reference legal system “ConsultantPlus”Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The investment strategy of the Krasnoyarsk region for the period until 2030. Decree of the Governor of the Krasnoyarsk region of December 17, 2013 N 239-y. Reference legal system “ConsultantPlus”Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Al-Mubaraki, H., Busler, M.: Challenges and opportunities of innovation and incubators as a tool for knowledge-based economy. J. Innov. Entrepreneurship 6(1), 15 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vladimirova, O.N., Zhivaeva, T.V., Chernykh, K.S., Goroshko, A.S.: Analytical support for innovative activity in the line of the life cycle of innovation. J. Fundam. Res. 6, 115–120 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bryukhanova, O.: State support of innovation in corporations of developed countries. Int. Res. J. 9((40) Part 1), 15–19 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Corona-Treviño, L.: Entrepreneurship in an open national innovation system (ONIS): a proposal for Mexico. J. Innov. Entrepreneurship 5(1), 22 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Derev’yanko, Y., Lukash, O., Marchenko, T.: Companies’ innovative development trends in the green economy. Mech. Econ. Regul. 4, 77–85 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gopi, K.: Fostering innovation performance from a sustainable development perspective: towards a research agenda. Int. J. Innov. Sustain. Dev. 1 (2017) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vladimirova, O.N., Zhivaeva, T.V., Chernykh, K.S., Goroshko, A.S.: Institutional support of innovation activity. J. Fundam. Res. 5, 137–142 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laperche, B., Liu, Z.: SMEs and knowledge-capital formation in innovation networks: a review of literature. J. Innov. Entrepreneurship 2(1), 21 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maradana, R., Pradhan, R., Dash, S., Gaurav, K., Jayakumar, M., Chatterjee, D.: Does innovation promote economic growth? Evidence from European countries. J. Innov. Entrepreneurship 6(1), 1 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nalivaychenko, E., Kirilchuk, S.: The development of methods for the innovation infrastructure progress in crimea region. J. Adv. Res. Law Econ. [S.l.] 8(4(26)), 1226–1240 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pettersen, I., Aarstad, J., Hovig, O., Tobiassen, A.: Business incubation and the network resources of start-ups. J. Innov. Entrepreneurship 5(1), 7 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Planing, P.: On the origin of innovations—the opportunity vacuum as a conceptual model for the explanation of innovation. J. Innov. Entrepreneurship 6(1), 5 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raghupathi, V., Raghupathi, W.: Innovation at country-level: association between economic development and patents. J. Innov. Entrepreneurship 6(1), 4 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rakhmatullin, R., Brennan, Louis: Facilitating innovation in European research area through pre-competitive EU-funded COST Actions. J. Innov. Entrepreneurship 3(1), 6 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators. Federal Service for State Statistics of the Russian Federation (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators. Federal Service for State Statistics of the Russian Federation (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Research and development intramural expenditures. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Research and development intramural expenditures. Collection of The Scientific Research Institute – Federal Research Centre for Projects Evaluation and Consulting Services (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Russia in figures. Federal Service for State Statistics of the Russian Federation (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Russia in figures. Federal Service for State Statistics of the Russian Federation (2017)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Snihur, Y., Wiklund, J.: Searching for innovation: product, process, and business model innovations and search behavior in established firms. Int. J. Innov. Sustain. Dev. (2018) Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tirabeni, L., Soderquist, K.E., Pisano, P.: driving innovation by enhancing employee roles: the balancing act of employee-driven innovation. Int. J. Soc. Behav. Educ. Econ. Bus. Ind. Eng. 10(1), 143–151 (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vladimirova, O., Malakhovskaya, M., Petrova, A., Rouiga, I., Khusainov, M.: Innovation capacity of the regions of siberian federal district: status and dynamics. J. Appl. Econ. Sci. 1(47), 124–138 (2017)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Willcocks, L., Oshri, I., Kotlarsky, J.: Why Innovation and why now? Int. J. Innov. Sustain. Dev. (2018)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yadav, V., Goyal, P.: User innovation and entrepreneurship: case studies from rural India. J. Innov. Entrepreneurship 4(1), 5 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Siberian Federal UniversityKrasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk KraiRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations