Innovative Project Technologies in High School

  • N. V. AgeyenkoEmail author
  • V. V. Dobrova
  • P. G. Labzina
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 139)


The relevance of the topic is due to the need to improve the quality of professional training for students of a technical university in the context of modernizing the educational process. Increasing the competitiveness and relevance of graduates in the labor-market at the current stage is determined by a number of factors, including the ability to apply the knowledge gained in practice, creative thinking, and the possession of a foreign language. The creation of a virtual educational environment as an innovative project technology contributes to the solution of this problem, within the framework of which a language environment is formed that contributes to improving the learning process, developing communicative competence, motivation for learning foreign language for specific purposes. In order to prove the relevance of the use of this method, the application of VR models as a new direction in the industry of modern technologies was considered and statistical data of various foreign and Russian consulting companies were provided. The analysis of the development of the Russian VR technology market is given in three segments, which leads to a conclusion about the dynamics and prospects of its development. Advantages of using this information technology, contributing to a full immersion in the professional environment, are highlighted. The authors come to the conclusion about the advisability of using virtual reality technologies as one of the most effective innovative project technologies in the educational process.


Interdisciplinary approach Project technologies Virtual reality Learning environment Facilitation in education Interactivity in education Foreign language skills Innovative teaching methods 


  1. 1.
    Ageenko, N.V., Dorofeeva, D.D.: Innovative technologies in the educational process: trends, prospects of development. Vestn. Samara State Tech. Univ. Psychol. Pedagogical Sci. Ser. 2(34), 6–16 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borri, C., Guberti, E.: The EU Lifelong Learning Programme (LLP) for the competitiveness of European engineering education on the global scale. In: Proceedings of the ICA 2011 (Washington Accord and ABET Imperatives), Chennai (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boruha, S.Y.: Technology of interdisciplinary advanced training of professional personnel in the context of integration of education, science and production. Mod. Probl. Sci. Educ. 4, 267–275 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bricken, M.: Virtual reality learning environments: potentials and challenges. Comput. Graph. 25(3), 178–184 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bylinsky, G.: Virtual Reality. Human Interface Technology Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chernysheva, E.N.: Prospects for an interdisciplinary approach in science. Introduction Way Sci. 1(5), 85–90 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Lucas, W.A., Brodeur, D.R.: The CDIO syllabus. An updated statement of goals for engineering education. In: Proceedings of 7th International CDIO Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 2–43 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davydenko, T.M.: Interdisciplinary advanced continuous training of professional personnel in the context of integration of education, science and production: pedagogical conditions. Perspect. Sci. 3(30), 27–33 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dobrova, V.V., Labzina, P.G.: Virtual reality in teaching foreign languages. Vestn. Samara State Tech. Univ. Psychol. Pedagogical Sci. Ser. 4(32), 17–21 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kashaev, R.S.: The development of science and education on the basis of an interdisciplinary approach. Successes Mod. Nat. Sci. 2, 82–87 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    March, T.: Working the Web for Education. Theory and Practice on Integrating the Web for Learning, Hershey, PA, United States (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Milton, J.: Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition, p. 342. Multilingual Matters, Bristol (2007) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pavlova, A.M., Zeer, E.F.: The problem of studying the professional and personal potential: the results of exploratory research. Education and Science, Moscow (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Polat, E.S.: New Pedagogical and Information Technologies in the Educational System. Academy, Moscow (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Popova, T.P., Nenasheva, T.A: Information technologies in teaching foreign languages in higher education (model of mixed education). Hist. Soc. Educ. Thought 6(1), 218–226 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rheingold, H.: Foreword. In: Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces in Higher Education: Concepts for the Modern Learning Environment. IGI Publishing (IGI Global), Hershey (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rheingold, H.: Virtual Reality, p. 56. Summit, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Selivanov, V.V., Selivanova, L.N.: Virtual reality as a method and means of learning. Educ. Technol. Soc. 21(3), 378–391 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Helsinki. Accessed 21 Mar 2018
  20. 20.
    Vladimirov, A.I.: Training of specialists in the virtual environment of professional activity is a requirement of time. High. Sch. Econ. Educ. Today 10, 2–6 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. V. Ageyenko
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. V. Dobrova
    • 1
  • P. G. Labzina
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Foreign LanguagesSamara State Technical UniversitySamaraRussia

Personalised recommendations