Advertisement

Determining the Order of Creation of Complex Technical Objects (Products) on the Example of Cases of Various Electrical Appliances Taking into Account Structural, Composite and Economic Factors

  • D. V. Skuba
  • A. N. Suyetin
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 139)

Abstract

Studies show that the economic component of production currently has the following features: consumers prefer durable products, and less expensive, but also more operational short-term products. As practical experience shows, should be considered notional simplicity in the creation of certain goods (appliances) when the configuration of all developed parts, electronic parts, etc. would be ideal to strive for rectangular, round form, i.e. the product in General will have the form of a parallelepiped, a cylinder, and their combinations will be used. The main provisions of product design from a technical and economic point of view: - for the consumer, the price of the product is often crucial; products should be designed in a modular manner; the product should be “divided” into separate components, which are simple shapes (cube, cylinder, etc.). This allows, on the one hand, to get an economic effect on production, and, on the other hand, to divide production into simpler stages; economic calculations show that the production of aluminum products in Russia, especially in modern conditions of sanctions, is reasonable; aluminum-the best material for many products, as it combines a beautiful structure, ease of processing, suitable for many areas of production, is positively perceived by consumers with different views on the aesthetics of the product.

Keywords

Features of demand Production under sanctions Economical design Industrial design Design principle Design Aluminum 

References

  1. 1.
    Korshunov, A.I., Muzafarov, R.S., Pletnev, M.A., Skuba, D.V., Fil’kin, N.M.: Systems-wide approaches in the design and design of standardized machine technology electric vehicle (OMTAT). Intell. Syst. Prod. 2(29), 40–47 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Matosian, E.A., Kesan, V.G., Suetin, A.N.: Factors of increase of competitiveness of state-owned corporations in Russia. Econ. Entrepreneurship 10(87), 478–482 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scuba, D.V.: The complex of system methods of design-design of the Delia. Izhevsk (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Suetin, A.N.: Actual problems of financial management of enterprises in the crisis. Bull. Udmurt Univ. Ser. Econ. Law 27(5), 71–77 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Suetin, A.N., Skuba, D.V., Semenova, A.G.: Production management: indicators of quality and cost of design product. Sci. Rev. 5, 121–128 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gorkavyy, M.A., Gudim, A.S., Efimov, A.Y., Solovev, D.B.: Intelligent system for prognostication and optimization of power expenses of technological processes at robotized productions. In: 2018 International Multi-Conference on Industrial Engineering and Modern Technologies (FarEastCon), pp. 1–7 (2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/FarEastCon.2018.8602503
  7. 7.
    Chye, E.U., Levenets, A.V., Solovev, D.B.: Hardware support of the periodic component detection algorithm based on zero-crossing. In: 2018 International Multi-Conference on Industrial Engineering and Modern Technologies (FarEastCon), pp. 1–5 (2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/FarEastCon.2018.8602639
  8. 8.
    Suetin, A.N., Scuba, D.V., Suetina, NAh: Production management: cost management using a single decorative element in artistic products with a functional purpose. Sci. Rev. 5, 142–148 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. V. Skuba
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • A. N. Suyetin
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Udmurt State UniversityIzhevskRussia
  2. 2.Moscow Technological InstituteMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Institute of International Economic RelationsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations