Advertisement

The Influence of Roof Fenestration on Daylight Distribution in an Atrium Space Under Tropical Sky Conditions

  • J. Yunus
  • A. Zain-Ahmed
  • S. S. Ahmad
Chapter
Part of the Innovative Renewable Energy book series (INREE)

Abstract

A parametric study was done to evaluate the daylight performance in atrium buildings focusing on the effect of roof fenestration on the atrium space under a range of sky conditions. The interaction between various roof configurations and daylight conditions inside the atrium space was also studied. In achieving this objective, the work began with a field study using scale models under real sky conditions in a tropical region. The data produced were used to simulate more complex conditions by running a simulation study using the IES-3178 VE-Pro (IESRadiance) program suite for daylighting simulations on a full-scale atrium. The photometry and geometry of the test modules were carefully reproduced. The surrounding and daylighting environment of the physical model under real sky conditions were also simulated. The evaluation of daylight performance under real sky conditions was very challenging due to dynamic changes and fluctuations in sky conditions throughout the day. The changes were controlled in the simulation studies by maintaining a 2% atrium surface reflectance in order to study the transmittance by the roof fenestrations.

For real sky conditions, the factors considered were atrium design such as the form, skylight shapes, floor height, surface reflectance and glazing transmittance. After the real sky study, a comprehensive simulation was conducted in a much more complex environment which included many parameters from both indoor and outdoor conditions. The external factors refer to sky conditions and the sun’s position such as solar altitude and elevation with respect to time.

Four models were developed to perform the daylighting performance analyses. The models used different roof fenestration designs and structural truss systems: flat, pitched, pyramidal-gridded and saw-tooth. It was found that structured roof forms reduce daylight levels in the atrium well by 55%. A high contribution of daylight penetration occurs at the centre nearest to the atrium opening. The transmittance of the atrium roof structure also decreased the illuminance level at the lowest corners of the atrium space by 50%. Under overcast skies, the illuminance levels decrease even more at the corners of the atrium floor, especially for the north- and west-facing atrium surfaces for all types of roofs. Not surprisingly, the flat roof performed well in maintaining the acceptable limit of maximum light utilisation and was most consistent in terms of light distribution across the atrium floor. Meanwhile, the pyramidal-gridded roof type performed better in terms of daylight contribution at approximately 50%. The pitched roof was found to be less consistent and had poor distribution, especially at low transmittance levels. These results will aid the atrium designer in making decisions on the optimal design strategy for daylighting and energy efficiency.

Keywords

Daylight performance Atrium Roof fenestrations 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, INTEC Education College and ISESCO for the support of this work and the production of this chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    YunusJ, AhmadSS, Zain-AhmedA (2010) Analysis of atrium’s architectural aspects in office building under tropical sky conditions. Paper presented at the International Conference In Social and Science Research (CSSR2010), Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    AhmadMH (1996) The influence of roof form and interior cross section on daylighting in the atrium spaces in Malaysia. PhD, University of ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahmad MH, Mohamad Rasdi MT (2000) Design principles of atrium buildings for the tropics. UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuan SL (2006) Daylighting of atria in Singapore (Master of Arts (Architecture)). National University of Singapore, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Othman AR, Zain-Ahmed A, Ayop SM (2007) Comparative analysis of top-lit atriums in Kuala Lumpur with respect to thermal comfort & illumination level. Abstracts of CSSR 06’07. Conf. on Scientific and Social Research 2007. UPENA.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    OthmanAR, Zain-AhmedA, AyopSM (2006) Study of sun-exposure hours of three roof form types for BIPV application in Malaysia. Paper presented at the International Symposium & Exhibition on Sustainable Energy & Environment (ISESEE2006), Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    YunusJ, AhmadSS, Zain-AhmedA (2013) Analysing the impact of roof obstructions on daylight levels in atrium buildings: physical scale model under real sky conditions. Paper presented at the 3rd International Building Conference 2013,Universiti Malaya, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zain-Ahmed A, Sopian K, Othman MY (2002) Availability of daylight from tropical skies—a case study of Malaysia. Energy Conversion Manage 25(2002):21–30Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mousavi M, Hayat Khan T, Lim YW (2016) Empirical validation of radiance-IES daylight simulation for furnished and unfurnished rooms under tropical sky. Int J Sustain Build Technol Urban Develop 7(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Calcagni B, Paroncini M (2004) Daylight factor prediction in atria building designs. Sol Energy 76(6):669–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghasemi M, Kandar MZ, Noroozi M, Yazdipur F, Namaziyan S, Roshan M (2013) Capability of computer simulation software for predicting average daylight factors in a vertical top-light atrium. J Basic ApplSci Res 3(11):96–105Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thanachareonkit A (2005) Comparing daylighting performance assessments of buildings in scale models and test modules. Sol Energy 79(2):168–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thanachareonkit A, Scartezzini JL (2010) Modelling complex fenestration systems using physical and virtual models. Sol Energy 84:563–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malaysian Standards (2014) Code of practice MS1525:2014. Energy efficiency and renewable energy applications in non-residential buildings. SIRIM, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zain-AhmedA (2000) Daylighting and shading for thermal comfort in Malaysian buildings. PhD, University of HertfordshireGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zain-Ahmed A, Sopian K, Othman MY, Sayigh AAM, Surendran PN (2002) Daylighting as a passive solar design strategy in tropical buildings: a case study of Malaysia. Energy Conversion Manage 43(2002):1725–1736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Othman AR, Zain-Ahmed A, Ayop SM (2006). Development of top-lit atrium design in Kuala Lumpur with respect to daylighting and thermal comfort. In Zain- Ahmed A, Abdul Rahman S, Shaari S (eds). Energy in Buildings: Sustainable Symbiosis. UPENAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Yunus
    • 1
  • A. Zain-Ahmed
    • 2
  • S. S. Ahmad
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Architecture, Planning & SurveyingUniversiti Teknologi MARAShah AlamMalaysia
  2. 2.INTEC Education CollegeShah AlamMalaysia

Personalised recommendations