Advertisement

Architectural Education for Sustainability

  • Derya OktayEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Innovative Renewable Energy book series (INREE)

Abstract

Owing to the need for sustainable environments in cities and other settlements, the real challenge for twenty-first-century architecture and architectural education is to ensure that, during the student’s education, serious attention is placed on the relationship between architecture and society and in the wider context of sustainability. In the last two decades, the growing awareness of the reciprocal relationship between architecture and the urban environment has led to the restructuring of both undergraduate and graduate programmes in architectural education, and the current architectural directives and associations require undergraduates and graduates to study the urban and social dimensions of architectural design. However, even when architects and educators take the urban environment into consideration, their main focus is on the visual aspect alone. In fact, it is equally as important for the design to fulfill the physical, social, emotional and spiritual needs of the people who use the environment and to ensure local distinctiveness together with a sense of place. In line with these points, this paper, following a critical review of the conventional type of architectural education, using the author’s own teaching experiences in two different architectural schools and based on research and observations at the University of Michigan, a university that is well-known for its environmental sensitivity and who presents positive efforts towards sustainable environments, also makes recommendations towards a ‘greener’ and more ‘sustainable’ focus within architectural education.

Keywords

Architectural education Sustainability Environmentally responsive design Institutional greenness 

References

  1. 1.
    Hagemann & Peets (1993) The American Vitruvius. Princeton Architectural Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oktay D (2011) Sustainable Urbanism revisited: a holistic framework based on tradition and contemporary orientations. In: Ercoskun OY (ed) Green and ecological technologies for urban planning: creating smart cities. IGI-Global, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oktay D (2004) Urban design for sustainability: a study on the Turkish City. Int J Sust Dev World Eco 11:24–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oktay D (2001) Planning housing environments for sustainability: assessments in Cypriot settlements. YEM, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dunham-Jones E (2004) In: Bothwell S et al (eds) The modernist model, the Windsor forum on design education. New Urban Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glasser DE (2000) Reflections on architectural education. J Archit Educ 53(4):250–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oktay D (2008) Architectural education and social perspectives: establishing the human context of everyday urban life through design studios, the Oxford conference 2008: 50 years on: re-setting the agenda for architectural education. University of Oxford, Oxford. (poster)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oktay D (2007) Üniversite—Kent İlişkisi ve Değişen Boyutlar (University—City Relationship and Changing Dimensions). Ocak 302:42–47Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wright J (2003) Introducing sustainability into the architecture curriculum in the United States. Int J Sustain High Educ 4(2):100–105MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ArchitectureOndokuz Mayis UniversitySamsunTurkey

Personalised recommendations